PhaseⅡ randomized trial comparing imatinib with high-dose interferon alpfa-2b as adjuvant therapy for high-risk melanoma patients with c-Kit mutations

毛丽丽,王轩,孔燕,代杰,白雪,迟志宏,崔传亮,盛锡楠,连斌
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-0785.2017.02.006
2017-01-01
Abstract:Objective Imatinib has changed the treatment paradigm for metastatic melanoma with c-Kit aberrations. However, it has not been trailed whether imatinib could be used as adjuvant therapy for melanomas. We conducted a randomized phaseⅡ clinical trial (NCT01782508) in high-risk melanoma patients bearing c-Kit mutations to compare the efficacy and safety of imatinib with high-dose IFN-α2b (HDI).Methods Forty-eight high-risk melanoma patients (stageⅡb-Ⅲc) with c-Kit mutations in exons 9, 11 or 13 after surgery without prior systemic therapy were randomized (ratio of 1:2) to imatinib (400 mg daily) or HDI (15×106 Unit/m2 d1-5/week×4 weeks plus 9×106 Unit, 3 times a week×48 weeks) arm. The primary endpoint was recurrence-free survival (RFS), and the secondary endpoints were distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS), overall survival (OS) and tolerability.Results The most common c-Kit mutation in patients was c-KitL576P (13/48). By October 2015, the median RFS of patients in HDI arm was 29.8 months (95%CI: 23.3-36.3 months), which was significantly (P=0.029) superior to that in imatinib arm (10.0 months; 95%CI: 0-20.0 months). Similar trend of RFS (P=0.005) was observed in patients harboring c-KitL576P mutation (4.8 months in imatinib arm versus 34.2 months in HDI arm). The estimated median OS was similar in both arms (P=0.43). More Grade 3/4 toxicities were recorded in the HDI arm.Conclusion sImatinib could not prolong RFS when compared with HDI as adjuvant therapy for high-risk melanoma patients with c-Kit mutations. Imatinib alone is not suitable for recommendation as adjuvant therapy for the high-risk melanoma patients with c-Kit mutations.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?