A comparative study in children undergoing ophthalmologic surgery during general anesthesia:systemic fentanyl vs. retrobulbar block combined with remifentanyl

Bailin Jiang,Hong Zhao,Lan Yao,Yi Feng

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-0785.2016.09.020

2016-01-01

Abstract:Objective To evaluate the influence of retrobulbar block combined with remifentanyl vs. systemic fentanyl on the hemodynamic response, stress response, inflammatory response, postoperative analgesia and perioperative adverse events in pediatric ophthalmologic surgeries during general anesthesia. Methods A total of 28 children undergoing vitreoretinal surgeries in Peking university people's hospital from Jun. 2013 to Mar. 2014 were enrolled in the study, whose age were 1-6 years. They were randomly assigned into 2 groups: retrobulbar nerve block combined with remifentanyl group (group N, n=13) and systemic fentanyl group (group F, n=15). Anesthesia was induced and maintained with propofol, and laryngeal mask airway was placed after rocuronium bromide given intravenously, following pressure control ventilation. In group N, remifentanyl was pumped continuously, and satisfying retrobulbar nerve block was achieved before surgical procedure. In group F, intravenous fentanyl was administrated intermittently. Two blood samples were collected before and after surgery to measure plasma cortisol, glucose and cytokines concentrations. The mean arterial pressure and heart rate were recorded at the time of before the&nbsp;induction of anesthesia (T0), after laryngeal mask airway placement (T1), beginning of surgery (T2), ending of surgery (T3), laryngeal mask airway removal (T4), leaving operating room (T5). The emergence time and time interval from cease of surgery to the laryngeal mask removal were recorded. The Pain Scales were assessed immediately after emergence from anesthesia, 2 h later and 24 h later, respectively. The adverse events during and after surgery were also recorded. Results The heart rate (per minute) in group N was significantly lower than in group F at T0, T2 and T3, respectively, (100.5±17.6)times/beat vs. (123.4±26.5)times/beat, t=-2.656, P=0.013; (85.2±14.9)times/beat vs. (119.3±26.0)times/beat, t=-4.179, P<0.001; (86.8±19.1)times/beat vs. (112.7±26.8)times/beat, t=-2.891, P=0.008. The mean arterial pressure in group N was significantly lower than in group F at T2 (66.2±9.5)mmHg vs. (78.0±10.6)mmHg, t=-3.073, P=0.005. The concentration of TNF-α after surgery in group N was significantly lower than in group F (51.8±7.8)pg/ml vs. (60.0±11.8)pg/ml, t=-2.137, P=0.042. There was no significant difference in Pain Scales immediately, 2 h and 24 h after emergence from anesthesia between groups. There was no severe adverse events during and after surgery in either group. Conclusion In pediatric ophthalmologic surgeries during general anesthesia, the application of retrobulbar block can profoundly suppress the hemodynamic response to surgery, may have potential benefit for suppression of the inflammatory response.