Analysis of AQP4/NMO-IgG Antibody Positive Patients with Neuromyelitis Optica Spectrum Disorders

Hongjun Hao,Ran Liu,Linlin Liu,Jingjing Luo,Feng Gao,Yun Yuan,Yining Huang
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-0785.2015.21.005
2015-01-01
Abstract:ObjectiveTo investigate the clinical significance of AQP4 antibody and NMO-IgG antibody in cerebrospinal fluid and serum in the diagnosis of neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorders (NMOSDs) patients.MethodsAmong 476 samples in the database, 114 cases were found to have positive AQP4 antibodies or NMO-IgG antibodies, who met the diagnostic criteria of neuromyelitis, NMOSDs or NINDS. NMO-IgG antibody was detected by indirect immunofluorescence using monkey brain tissue, AQP4 antibody was detected using indirect immunofluorescence assay on the matrix containing human recombinant full-length AQP4 peptide transfected cells (HEK293 cells), the wild-type HEK293 cells were used as negative control. The sample was evaluated as positive when level of either NMO-IgG antibody or AQP4 antibody elevated.ResultsThe positivity rate of AQP4 antibody/NMO-IgG antibody was 70.3% in NMO, 64.4% in NMOSDs, and 67.1% in NMO plus NMOSDs group. The sensitivity of AQP4 antibody/NMO-IgG antibody was 70.3% in NMO, 64.4% in NMOSDs, and 67.1% in NMO plus NMOSDs group. The specificity of AQP4 antibody/NMO-IgG antibody was 92.0% in NMO, NMOSDs, and NMO plus NMOSDs group. The percentage of numbers in accordance with clinical diagnosis was 79.0% in NMO, 74.3% in NMOSDs, and 72.9% in NMO plus NMOSDs group. The predictivity of AQP4 antibody/NMO-IgG antibody was 59.7% in NMO, 64.2% in NMOSDs, and 76.6% in NMO plus NMOSDs group. In simultaneously detection of NMO-IgG antibodies using monkey brain tissue, the positive rate of serum and cerebrospinal fluid were 49.1% and 17.5%. In simultaneous detection of AQP4 antibody on transfected cells as a substrate, the positive rate of serum and cerebrospinal fluid were 74.6% and 44.7%.ConclusionsDetermination of AQP4 antibody/NMO-IgG antibody can provide valuable information for clinical diagnosis of NMO or NMOSDs. It is recommended to use the two matrix determination of serum and CSF simultaneously to raise sensitivity. AQP4 antibody/NMO-IgG antibody is not unique to NMOSDs nor NMO. The significance of positivity should be carefully evaluated combining with clinical information.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?