The advances in diagnosing of hemodialysis catheter-related central venous stenosis

Mingyuan Xu,Yuliang Zhao,Ping Fu
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-0785.2014.12.035
2014-01-01
Abstract:As hemodialysis catheter-related central venous stenosis severely influences dialysis adequacy and patients’ prognosis, diagnosing central venous stenosis accurately is of great clinical importance. The authors analyzed the new progresses of imaging diagnosis in patients with hemodialysis catheter-related central venous stenosis. The advantages, disadvantages and applications of digital subtraction angiography (DSA), Doppler ultrasonography (DU), computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) were discussed. DSA is still the gold standard for assessing central venous stenosis, which could be followed by intravascular intervention if necessary. However, as an invasive procedure requiring a large amount of contrast agent, the application of DSA as a routine screening tool is limited. Though convenient and economical, DU is only regarded as a preliminary screening test, for its accuracy largely depends on the skill of the operator and it is not favorable in demonstrating central veins deep in the thoracic cavity covered by bones and lung lobules. CT angiography (CTA) has a good correlation with DSA in evaluating central venous stenosis with its capacity to provide a high spatial resolution in three-dimensional. MR angiography (MRA) is an alternative method in the assessment of central venous stenosis in hemodialysis patients. The most outstanding point is the avoidance of ionizing radiation and iodinated contrast media. Whereas, MRA has a relatively low resolution compared with CTA and could be influenced by flow-related artifacts. The presence of claustrophobia, pacemaker, and magnetized metal in patients are contraindicated in MRI scanning. As compared with DSA, MRA might over-estimate the level of stenosis. The difference between severe stenosis and total occlusion of the vessels in MRA images could be difficult to interpret and may mislead medical decision. Different imaging modalities have their own advantages and disadvantages which can be complementary to each other in clinic. Further researches are required to reveal the diagnosing value of different imaging methods with respect to various subgroups of dialysis patients and the indications.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?