Characteristics of tetracycline resistance genes in the anaerobic and aerobic treatment of tetracycline production wastewater

REN Jia,YAO Hong,LIU Miao-miao,ZHANG Yu,YANG Min
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1000-6923.2016.01.044
2016-01-01
Abstract:In order to understand the characteristics of antibiotic resistance genes (ARGs) in the anaerobic and aerobic treatment processes of two tetracycline production wastewater, the abundances and distribution of six frequently reported tetracycline resistance genes (tet(A),tet(C),tet(G),tet(Q),tet(W), andtet(X)) and two types of mobile elements (intI1and ISCR3) were determined by PCR and quantitative PCR (qPCR).tet(C) was detected in none of the samples, while the others were discovered in all of the samples. In the systems of the tetracycline production wastewater, the relative abundances (normalized to 16S rRNA genes) oftet(A),tet(G),tet(X) in the anaerobic sludge((1.25±0.16)×10-4~(4.52± 0.002)×10-2) were lower than those in the aerobic sludge ((9.88±0.67)×10-5~(2.70±0.29)×10-1), while the relative abundances oftet(Q) andtet(W) in the anaerobic sludge ((1.66±0.03)×10-2~(7.48±1.22)×10-2) were significantly higher than those in the aerobic sludge (1.94±0.12)×10-3~(2.85±0.16)×10-2). Besides, the relative abundances ofintI1 and ISCR3 in the anaerobic sludge ((1.48±0.01)×10-3~(2.61±0.31)×10-2) were significantly lower than those in the aerobic sludge ((1.18±0.15)×10-1~(8.99±0.75)×10-1), showing that the potential of horizontal gene transfer mediated by the mobile elements is lower in the anaerobic treatment process. It is indicated that aerobic treatment may facilitate the spread oftet(A),tet(G) andtet(X) but control the spread oftet(Q) andtet(W) in tetracycline production wastewater, with the opposite situation in the anaerobic treatment. The different distribution oftet genes was related to mobile genetic elements, resistance mechanism, and community structure.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?