Analysis of related factors of recurrent recurrence after minimally invasive surgery for choledoch- olithiasis

Guo-qiang RONG,Xiao-dong YANG,Hao-rong WU
DOI: https://doi.org/10.12037/YXQY.2016.12-15
2016-01-01
Abstract:Objective To study the related factors of recurrence after minimally invasive surgery for choledocholithiasis. Method The clinical data of 150 patients with choledocholithiasis treated in our hospital from May 2010 to April 2014 were followed up for 2 to 5 years, of which 136 patients were successfully followed up,36 patients who repeated postoperative recurrence ( ≥ 2) were enrolled into study group, in the remaining 100 patients selected 40 patients as control group by random number table method. The clinical data of the two groups were compared, and the related factors of choledocholithiasis recurrent recurrence after minimally invasive surgery were analyzed. Result There was no significant difference in the number of stones, stone size and common bile duct diameter between the two groups (P>0.05). Single factor analysis showed that the history of biliary surgery (OR=5.011, P=1.612), parapapillary diverticulum (OR=4.142, P=1.421), common bile duct angle (OR=14.315, P=2.661), history of cholecystectomy (OR=1.736, P=3.143) were the related factors of recurrent choledocholithiasis after minimally invasive surgery. The results of multivariate analysis showed that a parapapillary diverticulum (β=1.243, Waldχ2=6.43, P=0.011), bile duct angle<45 ° (β=2.548, Waldχ2=8.56, P=0.003), biliary surgery (β=1.788, Waldχ2=11.779, P=0.001) were the risk factors of recurrence of recurrent choledocholithiasis after minimally invasive surgery. Conclusion History of biliary surgery, parapapillary diverticulum and angle of choledocholithiasis are the independent risk factors for influence of recurrence of common bile duct stones phenomenon, and clinical treatment of patients should have a full range of treatment and diagnosis to reduce the incidence of recurrence after minimally invasive surgery.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?