Segmental allograft reconstruction for diaphyseal bone defect after tumor resection

Xiao-hui NIU,Zhi-ping DENG,Qing ZHANG,Lin HAO,Feng YU,Yuan LI
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.2095-252X.2017.06.002
2017-01-01
Abstract:Objective To evaluate the clinical outcomes and complications of segmental allograft reconstruction for diaphyseal defects after tumor resection. Methods We retrospectively analyzed 67 cases with diaphyseal defects who underwent segmental allograft reconstruction, including 32 cases located at the femur, 23 cases at the tibia and 12 cases at the humerus. Segmental allografts were preserved by deep fresh freezing, and the average length was 16.5 cm ( range: 8 - 30 cm ). The allografts were fixed by plates and screws, or interlocking intramedullary nails, or by both. We followed up the patients for a mean period of 50.2 months ( range: 12 - 182 months ) and analyzed the union of the allografts and complications. Results At the end of the follow-up, 5 patients died of the diseases. The allografts were removed out in 7 cases with severe complications. The 5-year survival rate was 86%. The bone union rate was 68.8%. The average union time was 16.8 months ( range: 6 - 48 months ). The union rate was 86.2% when the junction was located at the metaphyseal region, which was higher than 63.6% when the junction at the diaphyseal region. There were statistically significant differences between them. Nine of the nonunion cases received surgery again and bone union was achieved at last. At the end of the follow-up, the mean MSTS score was 24.3 ( range:17 - 30 ), 24.1 ( range: 18 - 28 ) for upper limbs and 24.4 ( range: 17 - 30 ) for lower limbs. Conclusions Segmental allograft is one of the main reconstruction methods for diaphyseal defects after tumor resection. It could be used for a long time with good function when bone union is achieved. For those patients with nonunion, bone union could also be gained after surgical intervention.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?