THE EFFECTS OF LIDOCAINE AND BUPIVACAINE ON CELL VIABILITY IN AN ARTICULAR CARTILAGE ORGAN CULTURE MODEL

Chang-Bin LEI,Dong WANG,Xi-Wen CAO,Xin-Wen TANG,Zhan-Kun CHEN
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1006-9852.2018.06.009
2018-01-01
Abstract:Objective:Intra-articular local anesthetic injection is widely used for pain relief after arthroscopic surgery and osteoarthritis. This study is to evaluate the effects of lidocaine and bupivacaine on cell viability using articular cartilage organ culture and the protective effect of chondrocyte membrane on chondrocytes. Methods:The residual normal parts of the femoral condyle resected in knee arthroplasty for female patients with osteoarthritis were used as test materials. Normal cartilages with full thickness in the diameter of 4mm were harvested by round drill, and remove of joint surface 1mm making damage group model. The articular cartilage was exposed to the lidocaine (1% and 2%) and bupivacaine (0.25%, 0.5%), for different durations (30, 60 and 120 min).Results:After exposing to 1% and 2% lidocaine 1 hour, the cell viabilitys of articular carti-lage would were 80.9±1.3% and 72.1±1% respectively. While after exposing to 0.25% and 0.5% bupivacaine 1hour, the cell viability 78.4%±2.5, 70.4±1.0% respectively. When the articular cartilage was cultured in 1% lidocaine for 30, 60, 120 mins, the cell viability of the normal group was decreased to 79.1±1.5%, 69.8±3.1%,56±10.7% and the cell viability of the injury group decreased to 76.5±1.5%, 66.9±3.9%, 52.2±10.7% respec-tively. And while the cell viability of the normal group was changed to 88.2±4.7%, 78.7±3.6%, 63.7±3.7%, the injury group decreased to 79.7±2.2%, 71.4±4.1%, 56.5±6.5%, when cultured in the 0.25% bupivacaine for 30mins, 60mins and 120mins.Conclusions:Using biologically and structurally intact articular cartilage we found that local anesthetics bupivacaine and lidocaine have a detrimental effect on chondrocyte viability in a dose- and time-dependent manner. The osteoarthritic articular cartilage might be more vulnerable to local anes-thetics than normal articular cartilage.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?