An Anti-Tumor Vaccine Against Marek's Disease Virus Induces Differential Activation and Memory Response of æ T Cells and CD8 T Cells in Chickens

Xiaoli Hao,Shuai Li,Jiaqi Li,Yi Yang,Aijian Qin,Shaobin Shang
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2021.645426
IF: 7.3
2021-01-01
Frontiers in Immunology
Abstract:Marek's disease virus (MDV) is a highly oncogenic alphaherpesvirus that causes deadly T-cell lymphomas and serves as a natural virus-induced tumor model in chickens. The most efficacious vaccine, CVI988/Rispens (CVI988), against MD has been used for several decades. However, the mechanisms leading to protective immunity following vaccination are not fully understood. In this study, employing multi-parameter flow cytometry, we performed a comprehensive analysis of T cell responses in CVI988-vaccinated chickens. CVI988 vaccination induced significant expansion of gamma delta T cells and CD8 alpha(+) T cells but not CD4(+) T cells in spleen, lung and blood at early time-points. The expansion of these cells was CVI988-specific as infection with very virulent MDV RB1B did not elicit expansion of either gamma delta or CD8 alpha(+) T cells. Phenotypic analysis showed that CVI988 vaccination elicited preferential proliferation of CD8 alpha(+) gamma delta T cells and CD8 alpha alpha co-receptor expression was upregulated on gamma delta T cells and CD8 alpha(+) T cells after immunization. Additionally, cell sorting and quantitative RT-PCR showed that CVI988 vaccination activated gamma delta T cells and CD8 alpha(+) T cells which exhibited differential expression of cytotoxic and T cell-related cytokines. Lastly, secondary immunization with CVI988 induced the expansion of CD8(+) T cells but not gamma delta T cells at higher magnitude, compared to primary immunization, suggesting CVI988 did induce memory CD8(+) T cells but not gamma delta T cells in chickens. Our results, for the first time, reveal a potential role of gamma delta T cells in CVI988-induced immune protection and provide new insights into the mechanism of immune protection against oncogenic MDV.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?