Abstract:Introduction: Patients who are considered high-risk for choledocholithiasis after biochemical testing and abdominal ultrasound (AUS) are recommended to undergo endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) with others to receive less invasive tests. The aim of the study is to determine whether high-risk patients by ASGE guidelines or other factors can accurately identify those with choledocholithiasis.Table 1: Diagnostic Performance of ASGE High-Risk Group and Other Test Characteristics in Patients with Suspected Choledocholithiasis ( N =2,726)Methods: Consecutive patients hospitalized (1/2011-12/2013) with suspected choledocholithiasis who received biochemical testing, AUS and definitive testing for choledocholithiasis (magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP), endoscopic ultrasound (EUS), ERCP, interventional radiology procedure and/or intraoperative cholangiogram (IOC)) at Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital were retrospectively identified. Patients with choledocholithiasis on AUS, bilirubin >4mg/dL, bilirubin >1.8mg/dL + dilated common bile duct (CBD) (>8mm and >6mm with or without prior cholecystectomy) and/or suspected cholangitis (presenting fever and/or leukocytosis) were considered high-risk per ASGE guidelines. Final diagnosis was based on choledocholithiasis identified on definitive testing. Results: Mean age of 2,726 patients with suspected choledocholithiasis was 55+15 yrs, 1,179 (43%) were male and 216 (8%) had prior cholecystectomy. On definitive testing (MRCP in 2,441 (90%), EUS in 69 (3%), interventional radiology procedure in 2, ERCP in 643 (23%), IOC in 189 (7%)), 1,076 (39%) patients had choledocholithiasis. A higher proportion of patients meeting ASGE high-risk criteria compared to other groups (770/1,271 (61%) vs. 306/1,455 (21%); OR=5.8, 95%CI 4.9-6.8) had confirmed choledocholithiasis. Diagnostic performance of test characteristics is shown (Table). On multivariate analysis, choledocholithiasis on AUS (AOR=17.4, 95%CI 12.6-23.9), bilirubin >4mg/dL (AOR=3.0, 95%CI 2.2-4.1) and bilirubin 1.8-4mg/dL (AOR=1.8, 95%CI 1.4-2.4) compared to < 1.8mg/dL and CBD dilation (AOR=1.8, 95%CI 1.5-2.2) increased the likelihood of choledocholithiasis. Conclusion: In patients with suspected choledocholithiasis, the specificity of high-risk group categorized by ASGE guidelines was suboptimal. Combination of factors that include choledocholithiasis on AUS and bilirubin >4mg/dL with or without CBD dilation had high specificities of >90% and moderate to high positive likelihood ratios. A revised algorithm with more stringent criteria may improve patient selection and reduce the risk of diagnostic ERCP.

Rational option and evaluation of imaging assessment methods before cholecystectomy

The comparative analysis between two methods for minimally invasive surgery in the treatment of cholecystolithiasis and choledocholithiasis

Imaging diagnosis of pancreatic cancer and preoperative imaging evaluation of resectability and staging

Usefulness of Magnetic Resonance Cholangiopancreatography and Intraoperative Cholangiography in Detection of Biliary Variants in Children with Choledochal Cysts

Comparison of Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy Combined with Intraoperative Endoscopic Sphincterotomy and Laparoscopic Exploration of the Common Bile Duct for Cholecystocholedocholithiasis

Intraoperative ERCP and endoscopic sphincterotomy combined with laparoscopic cholecystectomy for treatment of cholelithiasis with choledocholithiasis

Suboptimal Specificity of Asge High-Risk Group in Evaluation of Patients with Suspected Choledocholithiasis

Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy Combined with Intraoperative Cholangiography and Endoscopic Sphincterotomy for the Treatment of Choledocholithiasis

Preoperative Evaluation on Calot’s Triangle Adhesion by Magnetic Resonance Cholangiopancreatography

Prospective Evaluation of Magnetic Resonance Cholangiography in Patients with Suspected Common Bile Duct Stones Before Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy.

Clinical study on the necessity and feasibility of routine MRCP in patients with cholecystolithiasis before LC

Prospective Evaluation of MRI T2WI and MRCP in the Detection of Bile Duct Stones Before Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy

Do not get stumped: multimodality imaging findings of early and late post-cholecystectomy complications

The Diagnostic Value of GGT-Based Biochemical Indicators for Choledocholithiasis with Negative Imaging Results of Magnetic Resonance Cholangiopancreatography

Acute Gallstone Pancreatitis: If a Picture Is Worth a Thousand Words, How Many Images Do We Need?

[Differential diagnosis of gallbladder abnormalities : Ultrasound, computed tomography, and magnetic resonance imaging]

Application of medical diagnosis expert system in predicting common bile duct stones

CT and MR cholangiography: advantages and pitfalls in perioperative evaluation of biliary tree

Rational Application of Imaging Techniques in the Diagnosis of Periampullary Carcinomas

Applicationof selected via cystic duct cholangiography in emergency laparoscopic cholecystectomy

Evaluation of Clinical Indications of Three Treatments for Choledocholithiasis with Acute Cholangitis