270MO A Single-Arm, Open-Label, Multicenter Phase II Study of Camrelizumab in Patients with Recurrent or Metastatic (R/M) Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma (NPC) Who Had Progressed on ≥2 Lines of Chemotherapy: CAPTAIN Study

L. Zhang,Y. Yang,X. Chen,J. Li,J. Pan,X. He,L. Lin,Y. Shi,W. Feng,J. Xiong,K. Yang,Q. Yu,D. Hu,Y. Sun,Q. Zhang,G. Hu,P. Li,L. Shen,Q. Yang,B. Zhang
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annonc.2020.10.264
IF: 51.769
2020-01-01
Annals of Oncology
Abstract:Methods: We utilized a cohort of 255 patients with biopsy-proven, non-metastatic, T3-4 NPC (AJCC/UICC 8 th edition).Association of clinical covariates were tested by Cox regression.Germline profiling was conducted by whole exome sequencing (100x; Illumina NovaSeq) and variants were shortlisted based on known/predicted pathogenicity.The differential prevalence of variants was tested using Fisher's exact test.Results: Median follow-up duration of the cohort was 79 (IQR: 66-90) mo; median age was 49.4 (43.2-58.1)y.We identified 108 (42.3%)A-and 147 (57.6%)AD-subtype in our cohort.55 (50.9%) and 35 (32.4%) of the A-subtype patients compared to 64 (43.5%) and 75 (51.0%) in the AD-subgroup received chemoradiotherapy (CRT) alone and CRT+induction/adjuvant chemotherapy, respectively.High EBV DNA titer of >4000 copies were more frequent in the AD-than A-subgroup (50.0%vs 31.2%,P ¼ 0.0141).5-y DFS differed between the A and AD subtypes (85.1% [95% CI: 78.2-92.7]vs 67.0% [59.2-75.8%],P <0.001); the AD-subtype was significantly associated with worse DFS ], P ¼ 0.00147) after adjustment for age, EBV DNA and T4-status.Next, we observed germline variants in hallmark-of-cancer genes (FAT1 [N¼46; 18.0%] and NOTCH1 [N¼13; 5.1%]), DNA repair genes (SRSF6 [N¼13; 5.1%] and POLD1 [N¼14; 5.5%]) and genes with known association to NPC (MST1R [N¼13; 5.1%] and SYNE1[N¼50; 19.6%]).Of them, TGFBR2 variants were significantly associated with the unfavorable AD-subtype ], P ¼ 0.041). Conclusions:We have shown that the AD-subtype in patients with LA-NPC is associated with an inferior DFS.The TGFBR2germline variants may be associated with the susceptibility of this unfavorable phenotype.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?