Reliability and Validity of the Chinese Version of Narcolepsy Severity Scale in Adult Patients with Narcolepsy Type 1

Chenyang Li,Karen Spruyt,Chi Zhang,Yuhua Zuo,Shaomei Shang,Xiaosong Dong,Hui Ouyang,Jun Zhang,Fang Han
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sleep.2021.02.008
IF: 4.842
2021-01-01
Sleep Medicine
Abstract:Objective: To evaluate reliability and validity of the Chinese version of Narcolepsy Severity Scale (NSS) in adult patients with narcolepsy type 1 (NT1). Methods: One hundred and fifty-one adult patients (>= 18 years) with NT1 were recruited. All filled out the 15-item Chinese version of NSS. Item analysis included critical ratio and correlation analysis. The validity of NSS was assessed by exploratory factor analysis, discriminant validity and convergent validity. Reliability of NSS was assessed by Cronbach's a coefficient, spilt-half reliability and test-retest reliability. Results: Critical value of all 15 items ranged from 3.01 to 13.36. Each item was significantly correlated with the total score by a correlation coefficient (r) ranging from 0.219 to 0.700. Three common domains were extracted and 15 items explained 54.86% of the total variance. There was a shift in domains compared to the English version likely due to cultural differences. Cronbach's alpha coefficient for the total scale of 15 items was 0.821 and for three factors was 0.726, 0.748 and 0.760 respectively. The NSS had good correlation with Epworth sleepiness scale scores, Insomnia severity index scores and moderate correlation with mean the sleep latency of polysomnographic recording, and European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions Questionnaire. The Chinese version of NSS showed good spilt-half reliability and test-retest reliability. Conclusion: The Chinese version of NSS shows satisfactory psychometric properties with good validity and reliability. It is applicable to evaluate the severity and consequences of symptoms in Chinese adult patients with NT1. (C) 2021 Published by Elsevier B.V.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?