Abstract:Abstract When different sources of sensory information suggest competing behavioral responses, the efficiency of decision-making is impaired. Prior work suggests that at least two mechanisms may play a role in mitigating this interference: using early selective attention to extract the most relevant sensory inputs to avoid conflict or increasing the efficiency of the executive control network to resolve conflict during post-perceptual processing. To test these alternatives, we combined a stimulus-frequency tagging technique with a classic color-word Stroop paradigm, where color-bar targets and letter-string distractors were simultaneously flickered at different frequencies. Using electroencephalography (EEG), we measured the quality of early sensory processing by assessing the amplitude of steady-state visually evoked potentials (SSVEPs) elicited by the targets and distractors. We also measured the engagement of the executive control network by assessing changes in frontal theta (4-7Hz) and posterior alpha oscillations (8-14Hz). Counter to the ‘early selective sensory modulation’ account, the amplitude of the SSVEP response was not modulated by manipulations of color/word congruency, while the frontal theta activity increased and the posterior alpha activity decreased in response to conflict. Moreover, target-related SSVEP amplitude was not correlated with response times (RTs) and a higher (not lower) distractor-related SSVEP amplitude predicted faster RTs. On the other hand, the amplitude of the frontal theta and alpha activity was highly correlated with RTs, irrespective of conflict levels. Over all, these results highlight the dominant role of the executive control network in conflict resolution during post-perceptual processing. Significance Statement Conflicting information interferes with decision-making. However, this interference can be mitigated either by extracting the most relevant inputs during early sensory processing or by increasing the efficiency of the executive control processes to resolve conflict. By measuring electroencephalography (EEG) in humans performing a modified color-word Stroop task, we examined early sensory responses evoked by targets and distractors while simultaneously monitoring frontal theta and posterior alpha oscillations to index the activation of the executive control network. We found evidence that the executive control network played a more prominent role in resolving conflict.

Conflict Processing Networks: A Directional Analysis of Stimulus-Response Compatibilities Using MEG.

Understanding the human conflict processing network: A review of the literature on direct neural recordings during performance of a modified stroop task

An fMRI Study of Response and Semantic Conflict in the Stroop Task

Conflict Processing in Schizophrenia: Dissociable neural mechanisms revealed by the N2 and frontal midline theta

When conflict cannot be avoided: executive control dominates early selective sensory modulations during cognitive conflict

Spatiotemporal dynamics of selective attention and visual conflict monitoring using a Stroop task

The Important Role of the Right Dorsolateral Prefrontal Cortex in Conflict Adaptation: A Combined Voxel-Based Morphometry and Continuous Theta Burst Stimulation Study

cTBS to Right DLPFC Modulates Physiological Correlates of Conflict Processing: Evidence from a Stroop task

Common and distinct BOLD correlates of Simon and flanker conflicts which can(not) be reduced to time‐on‐task effects

Connectivity of Frontoparietal Regions Reveals Executive Attention and Consciousness Interactions.

Electrophysiological Dynamics Reveal Distinct Processing of Stimulus-Stimulus and Stimulus-Response Conflicts

Effects of contextualized emotional conflict control on domain-general conflict control: fMRI evidence of neural network reconfiguration

A new perspective on the role of the frontoparietal regions in Stroop‐like conflicts

EEG Neural Oscillatory Dynamics Reveal Semantic and Response Conflict at Difference Levels of Conflict Awareness

Distinct mechanisms underlying cross-modal semantic conflict and response conflict processing

The Neural Dynamics of Conflict Adaptation Within a Look-to-Do Transition

Frontal And Occipital-Parietal Alpha Oscillations Distinguish Between Stimulus Conflict And Response Conflict

Brain Functional Mechanisms in Attentional Processing Following Modified Conflict Stroop Task

The Neural Mechanisms of Semantic and Response Conflicts: an Fmri Study of Practice-Related Effects in the Stroop Task

Context Modulates Early Stimulus Processing when Resolving Stimulus-response Conflict

Correlation between hemodynamic and electrophysiological signals dissociates neural correlates of conflict detection and resolution in a Stroop task: a simultaneous near-infrared spectroscopy and event-related potential study