Abstract:In considering the college admissions problem, almost fifty years ago, Gale and Shapley came up with a simple abstraction based on preferences of students and colleges. They introduced the concept of stability and optimality; and proposed the deferred acceptance (DA) algorithm that is proven to lead to a stable and optimal solution. This algorithm is simple and computationally efficient. Furthermore, in subsequent studies it is shown that the DA algorithm is also strategy-proof, which means, when the algorithm is played out as a mechanism for matching two sides (e.g. colleges and students), the parties (colleges or students) have no incentives to act other than according to their true preferences. Yet, in practical college admission systems, the DA algorithm is often not adopted. Instead, an algorithm known as the Boston Mechanism (BM) or its variants are widely adopted. In BM, colleges accept students without deferral (considering other colleges' decisions), which is exactly the opposite of Gale-Shapley's DA algorithm. To explain and rationalize this reality, we introduce the notion of reciprocating preference to capture the influence of a student's interest on a college's decision. This model is inspired by the actual mechanism used to match students to universities in Hong Kong. The notion of reciprocating preference defines a class of matching algorithms, allowing different degrees of reciprocating preferences by the students and colleges. DA and BM are but two extreme cases (with zero and a hundred percent reciprocation) of this set. This model extends the notion of stability and optimality as well. As in Gale-Shapley's original paper, we discuss how the analogy can be carried over to the stable marriage problem, thus demonstrating the model's general applicability.

Weak Stability and Pareto Efficiency in School Choice

School Choice as a One-Sided Matching Problem: Cardinal Utilities and Optimization

Constrained School Choice with Incomplete Information

Stable Matching with Contingent Priorities

School Choice with Multiple Priorities

Improving the Deferred Acceptance with Minimal Compromise

Matchings under Preferences: Strength of Stability and Trade-offs

Strategyproof Pareto-Stable Mechanisms for Two-Sided Matching with Indifferences

A Cost-Minimizing Algorithm for School Choice

Internally Stable Matchings and Exchanges.

Ex-Ante Fairness under Constrained School Choice: an Experimental Approach

From Boston to Shanghai to Deferred Acceptance: Theory and Experiments on a Family of School Choice Mechanisms

Stable and extremely unequal

Dynamic Reserves in Matching Markets

Fairness and efficiency trade-off in two-sided matching

Approximately Stable, School Optimal, and Student-Truthful Many-to-One Matchings (via Differential Privacy)

On the Equivalence of Two Competing Affirmative Actions in School Choice

Stable matching as transportation

Loss aversion in strategy-proof school-choice mechanisms

Multi-District School Choice: Playing on Several Fields

Reciprocating Preferences Stablize Matching: College Admissions Revisited