Abstract:Abstract. As air pollution is regarded as the single largest environmental health risk in Europe it is important that communication to the public is up to date and accurate and provides means to avoid exposure to high air pollution levels. Long- and short-term exposure to outdoor air pollution is associated with increased risks of mortality and morbidity. Up-to-date information on present and coming days' air quality helps people avoid exposure during episodes with high levels of air pollution. Air quality forecasts can be based on deterministic dispersion modelling, but to be accurate this requires detailed information on future emissions, meteorological conditions and process-oriented dispersion modelling. In this paper, we apply different machine learning (ML) algorithms – random forest (RF), extreme gradient boosting (XGB), and long short-term memory (LSTM) – to improve 1, 2, and 3 d deterministic forecasts of PM10, NOx, and O3 at different sites in Greater Stockholm, Sweden. It is shown that the deterministic forecasts can be significantly improved using the ML models but that the degree of improvement of the deterministic forecasts depends more on pollutant and site than on what ML algorithm is applied. Also, four feature importance methods, namely the mean decrease in impurity (MDI) method, permutation method, gradient-based method, and Shapley additive explanations (SHAP) method, are utilized to identify significant features that are common and robust across all models and methods for a pollutant. Deterministic forecasts of PM10 are improved by the ML models through the input of lagged measurements and Julian day partly reflecting seasonal variations not properly parameterized in the deterministic forecasts. A systematic discrepancy by the deterministic forecasts in the diurnal cycle of NOx is removed by the ML models considering lagged measurements and calendar data like hour and weekday, reflecting the influence of local traffic emissions. For O3 at the urban background site, the local photochemistry is not properly accounted for by the relatively coarse Copernicus Atmosphere Monitoring Service ensemble model (CAMS) used here for forecasting O3 but is compensated for using the ML models by taking lagged measurements into account. Through multiple repetitions of the training process, the resulting ML models achieved improvements for all sites and pollutants. For NOx at street canyon sites, mean squared error (MSE) decreased by up to 60 %, and seven metrics, such as R2 and mean absolute percentage error (MAPE), exhibited consistent results. The prediction of PM10 is improved significantly at the urban background site, whereas the ML models at street sites have difficulty capturing more information. The prediction accuracy of O3 also modestly increased, with differences between metrics. Further work is needed to reduce deviations between model results and measurements for short periods with relatively high concentrations (peaks) at the street canyon sites. Such peaks can be due to a combination of non-typical emissions and unfavourable meteorological conditions, which are rather difficult to forecast. Furthermore, we show that general models trained using data from selected street sites can improve the deterministic forecasts of NOx at the station not involved in model training. For PM10 this was only possible using more complex LSTM models. An important aspect to consider when choosing ML algorithms is the computational requirements for training the models in the deployment of the system. Tree-based models (RF and XGB) require fewer computational resources and yield comparable performance in comparison to LSTM. Therefore, tree-based models are now implemented operationally in the forecasts of air pollution and health risks in Stockholm. Nevertheless, there is big potential to develop generic models using advanced ML to take into account not only local temporal variation but also spatial variation at different stations.

Identifying Atmospheric Pollutant Sources Using a Machine Learning Dispersion Model and Markov Chain Monte Carlo Methods

Research on Traceability Method of Gas Leak for Emergency Auxiliary Support

Study of statistically correcting model CMAQ-MOS for forecasting regional air quality

Application of the XGBoost Machine Learning Method in PM2.5 Prediction: A Case Study of Shanghai

Bagging Based Ensemble Learning Approaches for Modeling the Emission of PCDD/Fs from Municipal Solid Waste Incinerators.

Source Inversion of Toxic Gas Dispersion in Urban Areas Based on the MCMC Method

Source term estimation for continuous plume dispersion in Fusion Field Trial-07: Bayesian inference probability adjoint inverse method

Application of machine learning algorithms to improve numerical simulation prediction of PM2.5 and chemical components

Improving 3-day deterministic air pollution forecasts using machine learning algorithms

Rapid simulation of airborne contaminant transport: Coupling concentration response factor method into a Markov chain model

Ozone response modeling to NOx and VOC emissions: Examining machine learning models

Intracortical Lipoma of Tibia in an Adult.

An Intercomparison of Weather Normalization of PM2.5 Concentration Using Traditional Statistical Methods, Machine Learning, and Chemistry Transport Models

A Novel Machine Learning Method for Evaluating the Impact of Emission Sources on Ozone Formation

Evaluation of Different Machine Learning Approaches in Forecasting PM2.5 Mass Concentrations

Identification of pollution sources in rivers using a hydrodynamic diffusion wave model and improved Bayesian-Markov chain Monte Carlo algorithm

Ensemble-based deep learning for estimating PM2.5 over California with multisource big data including wildfire smoke

Diagnosing drivers of PM2.5 simulation biases in China from meteorology, chemical composition, and emission sources using an efficient machine learning method

Prediction of PM2.5 Concentration Using Spatiotemporal Data with Machine Learning Models

Cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Chest compressions.

A Bayesian hierarchical model for urban air quality prediction under uncertainty