Abstract:This paper aims to explore metrics for evaluating the effectiveness of functional decomposition methods regarding problem space exploration at the early design stage. Functional decomposition involves breaking down the main purpose of a complex problem or system into a set of more manageable sub-functions, leading to a clearer understanding of the problem space and its various aspects. While various metrics have been used to evaluate functional decomposition outcomes, little literature has focused on assessing its effectiveness in problem space exploration. To address the gap, this research introduces three metrics for problem space evaluation defined by functional models: quantity of unique functions ( M 1), breadth and depth of the hierarchical structure ( M 2), and relative semantic coverage ratio of the problem space ( M 3). An example study is conducted to illustrate the evaluation process, comparing functional analysis with and without explicit human-centric considerations using a power screwdriver as a case product. The analysis in the example study reveals that the breadth of the hierarchical structure (part of M 2) is marginally larger in the condition with explicit human-centric considerations (Condition A) compared to the condition without such considerations (Condition B). However, no significant differences are observed in terms of other metrics. The qualitative analysis based on semantic comparisons suggests that Condition A facilitates participants in generating a diverse set of functions supporting user safety requirements more effectively than Condition B. Overall, the example study demonstrates the evaluation process for each metric and discusses their nuances and limitations. By proposing these metrics, this research contributes to benchmarking and evaluating the effectiveness of different methods in promoting functional analysis in engineering design. The metrics provide valuable insights into problem space exploration, offering designers a better understanding of the efficacy of their functional decomposition methods in early design stages. This, in turn, fosters more informed decision-making and contributes to the advancement of functional analysis methodologies in engineering design practices.

Analysis of Problem Decomposition Strategies of Novice Industrial Designers Using Network-Based Cognitive Maps

A text-based analysis approach to representing the design selection process

Preliminary Study on Students’ Experiences in Design-Based Interdisciplinary Learning

Research on intelligent product conceptual design based on cognitive process

Research on the Process Planning and Multi-Method Integration Strategy of Product Conceptual Design with Cognitive Mechanisms

An Integrated Cognitive Computing Approach for Systematic Conceptual Design

PROBLEM SOLVING BEHAVIOR EMPLOYED IN APARTMENT INTERIOR WORKS DESIGN USING INTERACTIVE EVOLUTIONARY COMPUTATION

Comparing the design cognitive process between problem-driven and solution-driven industrial design students

Using linkography to understand the thinking differences of designers between engineering and art backgrounds in the early stages of the design process

Using Linkography to Quantitatively Analyze the Design Ideation of AI Agents

Exploring the learning problems and resource usage of undergraduate industrial design students in design studio courses

Enterprise Knowledge Network Based on Cognitive Navigation Mode

Research on knowledge navigation supporting rapid design of complex product

Evaluating the effectiveness of functional decomposition in early-stage design: development and application of problem space exploration metrics

Using integrated quality function deployment and theory of innovation problem solving approach for ergonomic product design

Protocol Analysis of Designers Using an Interactive Evolutionary Computation

Cognitive styles and design performances in conceptual design collaboration with GenAI

Solution driven versus problem driven design: strategies and outcomes

Mapping Novice Designer Behavior to Design Fixation in the Early-Stage Design Process

Behavioral Analysis of Analogical Reasoning in Design: Differences among Designers with Different Expertise Levels

Exploring the Learning Problems and Resources Usage of Undergraduate Industrial Design Students in Design Studio