Abstract:The Chinese government set a goal in 2009 to cut carbon emissions by 40–45 percent of 2005 GDP per unit by 2020. The role of fiscal decentralization reform in strengthening environmental governance has gained importance. This paper explored the impact of fiscal decentralization reform from 2010 to 2019 on carbon dioxide emissions in China. We utilized the first-order differential dynamic panel econometrics model to examine the correlation between fiscal decentralization and carbon dioxide emission under fiscal imbalance and transfer indirect effects. The findings revealed that 1) fiscal imbalance reduced CO 2 emissions due to the decentralization of revenue, and expenditure asymmetry undermined CO2 emissions control. 2) The central government’s transfer payments offset the negative consequences of a fiscal imbalance. The fiscal decentralization of the government caused a difference between regional income and expenditures in the budget. However, it could affect local government expenditure on carbon emission control through central transfer payments, which could restrain carbon emissions and control environmental pollution. 3) The impact of fiscal decentralization on carbon dioxide emissions was influenced by the industrial structure with the U-Shape effect. This was because the adjustment of the industrial structure was cross-term. In the early stage of the industrial structure adjustment, there was a significant decline in coal consumption demand and carbon emissions reduced. However, as the proportion of the secondary industry increased, there was a significant positive correlation between the secondary sector and carbon dioxide emissions in China. Our findings have important policy implications. First, while the promotion of Chinese officials is based on local GDP performance, locals may introduce green GDP as the criterion for rating governments’ performance. Second, local governments should improve environmental governance by increasing technical, environmental protection, and innovation investment. All in all, the findings provide a theoretical basis for relevant research and policy suggestions for China.

How to explain the inverted U-shaped curve of tax centralization in China?

Tax Burden, Regulations and Development of Service Sector in China

Productivity effects of corporate income tax: Evidence from China

Is fiscal revenue concentration ratio in China too high

Expansionary Fiscal Spending among Chinese Local Governments:Observations and Explanations

Endogenous cyclical corporate tax burden in China: The role of tax quotas and growth targets

The Structure of Business Taxation in China

Decentralization , Deregulation and Economic Transition in China

On the Fiscal Decentralization and the Development of Non-public Sectors

The Effects of Vertical and Horizontal Incentives on Local Tax Efforts: Evidence from China

Economic Development, Personal Income Tax Adjustment and China's Urban Household Income Disparity

Fiscal Decentralization: Incentives, Redistribution and Reform in China

A study on the impact of fiscal decentralization on carbon emissions with U-shape and regulatory effect

Deregulation, Decentralization, and China’s Growth in Transition

An Analysis of the Redistributive Effect of China＇s Tax System Since the Reform of Tax Distribution System

Fiscal Decentralization and Political Centralization in China

Structural tax reform and local government non-tax revenues – evidence from rural tax reform of China

Shifting Fiscal Control to Limit Cadre Power in China'S Townships and Villages

Sustainable Export Innovation Behavior of Firms Under Fiscal Incentive

Local tax rebates, corporate tax burdens, and firm migration: Evidence from China

Tax competition, environmental regulation and high-quality economic development: An empirical test based on spatial Durbin model