Abstract:The Greenland Ice Sheet (GrIS) has been losing mass since the 1990s as a direct consequence of rising temperatures and has been projected to continue to lose mass at an accelerating pace throughout the 21st century, making it one of the largest contributors to future sea-level rise. The latest Coupled Model Intercomparison Project Phase 6 (CMIP6) models produce a greater Arctic amplification signal and therefore also a notably larger mass loss from the GrIS when compared to the older CMIP5 projections, despite similar forcing levels from greenhouse gas emissions. However, it is also argued that the strength of regional factors, such as melt–albedo feedbacks and cloud-related feedbacks, will partly impact future melt and sea-level rise contribution, yet little is known about the role of these regional factors in producing differences in GrIS surface melt projections between CMIP6 and CMIP5. In this study, we use high-resolution (15 km) regional climate model simulations over the GrIS performed using the Modèle Atmosphérique Régional (MAR) to physically downscale six CMIP5 Representative Concentration Pathway (RCP) 8.5 and five CMIP6 Shared Socioeconomic Pathway (SSP) 5-8.5 extreme high-emission-scenario simulations. Here, we show a greater annual mass loss from the GrIS at the end of the 21st century but also for a given temperature increase over the GrIS, when comparing CMIP6 to CMIP5. We find a greater sensitivity of Greenland surface mass loss in CMIP6 centred around summer and autumn, yet the difference in mass loss is the largest during autumn with a reduction of 27.7 ± 9.5 Gt per season for a regional warming of +6.7 ∘ C and 24.6 Gt per season more mass loss than in CMIP5 RCP8.5 simulations for the same warming. Assessment of the surface energy budget and cloud-related feedbacks suggests a reduction in high clouds during summer and autumn – despite enhanced cloud optical depth during autumn – to be the main driver of the additional energy reaching the surface, subsequently leading to enhanced surface melt and mass loss in CMIP6 compared to CMIP5. Our analysis highlights that Greenland is losing more mass in CMIP6 due to two factors: (1) a (known) greater sensitivity to greenhouse gas emissions and therefore warmer temperatures and (2) previously unnotified cloud-related surface energy budget changes that enhance the GrIS sensitivity to warming.

Dataset for "reduced Ice Loss from Greenland under Stratospheric Aerosol Injection"

Estimating Antarctic Ice Sheet Contributions to Future Sea Level Rise Using a Coupled Climate-Ice Sheet Model

Greenland Ice Sheet Surface Mass Balance 1991–2000: Application of Polar MM5 Mesoscale Model and in Situ Data

Greater Greenland Ice Sheet contribution to global sea level rise in CMIP6

Assessing GFDL‐ESM4.1 Climate Responses to a Stratospheric Aerosol Injection Strategy Intended to Avoid Overshoot 2.0°C Warming

ISMIP6 Antarctica: a multi-model ensemble of the Antarctic ice sheet evolution over the 21st century

Multi‐Model Simulation of Solar Geoengineering Indicates Avoidable Destabilization of the West Antarctic Ice Sheet

Cloud- and ice-albedo feedbacks drive greater Greenland Ice Sheet sensitivity to warming in CMIP6 than in CMIP5

Greenland Ice Sheet Surface Runoff Projections to 2200 Using Degree-Day Methods

A Reconciled Estimate of Ice-Sheet Mass Balance

Future sea level change under CMIP5 and CMIP6 scenarios from the Greenland and Antarctic ice sheets

The Effect of Physically Based Ice Radiative Processes on Greenland Ice Sheet Albedo and Surface Mass Balance in E3SM

Climate Response to Latitudinal and Altitudinal Distribution of Stratospheric Sulfate Aerosols

Extensive inland thinning and speed-up of Northeast Greenland Ice Stream

Kicking the Can Down the Road: Understanding the Effects of Delaying the Deployment of Stratospheric Aerosol Injection

Diverging future surface mass balance between the Antarctic ice shelves and grounded ice sheet

From the Surface to the Stratosphere: Large‐Scale Atmospheric Response to Antarctic Meltwater

Ice sheet mass loss caused by dust and black carbon accumulation

Projections of Greenland periphery glaciers and ice caps's change

Pervasive ice sheet mass loss reflects competing ocean and atmosphere processes

Climate Response to Increasing Antarctic Iceberg and Ice Shelf Melt