Inter‐prefectural and urban–rural regional disparities in rectal cancer and rectal resections: A Japanese nationwide population‐based cohort study from 2014 to 2019

Masamitsu Kido,Tomohiro Arita,Katsutoshi Shoda,Hiroki Shimizu,Jun Kiuchi,Kenji Nanishi,Luying Yan,Eigo Otsuji
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/ags3.12865
2024-10-02
Annals of Gastroenterological Surgery
Abstract:This study aimed to clarify regional disparities in rectal cancer and rectal resections, using a Japanese nationwide database. There was no significant difference between urban and rural prefectures in the number of rectal resections, despite a significantly higher incidence of rectal cancer in rural prefectures and a significantly higher number of board‐certified surgeons in urban prefectures. This pattern suggests a potential migration of surgical services from rural to urban areas. Aim This observational study aimed to elucidate the regional disparities in rectal cancer (RC) and rectal resections (RRs) across Japan. Methods The annual incidence of RC, and number of all RRs and board‐certified surgeons by the Japan Society for Endoscopic Surgery were examined by prefecture in Japan from 2014 to 2019. The surgical approaches were broken down by open and laparoscopic. Disparities in 47 prefectures and urban–rural disparities were evaluated using the Gini coefficient and unpaired t‐test. Results The annual national average incidence of RC was 50 127 and the number of all RRs was 39 903. Gini coefficients for RC, and laparoscopic and all RRs were <0.2, indicating low inequality. There was no significant difference between urban and rural prefectures in the number of RRs, despite a significantly higher incidence of RC in rural prefectures and a significantly higher number of board‐certified surgeons in urban prefectures (p
gastroenterology & hepatology
What problem does this paper attempt to address?