The Ecology Underground Coalition: Building a Collaborative Future of Belowground Ecology and Ecologists
Camille E. Defrenne,Elsa Abs,Amanda Longhi Cordeiro,Lee Dietterich,Moira Hough,Jennifer M. Jones,Stephanie N. Kivlin,Weile Chen,Daniela Cusack,Andre L. C. Franco,Albina Khasanova,Daniel Stover,Adriana L. Romero-Olivares
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/nph.17163
IF: 9.4
2021-01-01
New Phytologist
Abstract:New PhytologistVolume 229, Issue 6 p. 3058-3064 MeetingsOpen Access The Ecology Underground coalition: building a collaborative future of belowground ecology and ecologists Camille E. Defrenne, Corresponding Author Camille E. Defrenne defrennece@ornl.gov orcid.org/0000-0003-2767-4892 Climate Change Science Institute and Environmental Sciences Division, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, TN, 37830 USA Author for correspondence: email defrennece@ornl.govSearch for more papers by this authorElsa Abs, Elsa Abs orcid.org/0000-0001-9501-1412 Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of California Irvine, 321 Steinhaus, Irvine, CA, 92697 USASearch for more papers by this authorAmanda Longhi Cordeiro, Amanda Longhi Cordeiro orcid.org/0000-0001-7226-0133 Department of Ecosystem Science and Sustainability, Colorado State University, Campus Delivery 1476, Fort Collins, CO, 80523 USASearch for more papers by this authorLee Dietterich, Lee Dietterich orcid.org/0000-0003-4465-5845 Department of Ecosystem Science and Sustainability, Colorado State University, Campus Delivery 1476, Fort Collins, CO, 80523 USASearch for more papers by this authorMoira Hough, Moira Hough Department of Ecology & Evolutionary Biology, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, 85721 USASearch for more papers by this authorJennifer M. Jones, Jennifer M. Jones The Kellogg Biological Station, Michigan State University, Hickory Corners, MI, 48824 USASearch for more papers by this authorStephanie N. Kivlin, Stephanie N. Kivlin orcid.org/0000-0003-2442-7773 Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN, 37996 USASearch for more papers by this authorWeile Chen, Weile Chen orcid.org/0000-0002-3438-4036 College of Life Sciences, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, 310027 ChinaSearch for more papers by this authorDaniela Cusack, Daniela Cusack orcid.org/0000-0003-4681-7449 Department of Ecosystem Science and Sustainability, Colorado State University, Campus Delivery 1476, Fort Collins, CO, 80523 USASearch for more papers by this authorAndré L. C. Franco, André L. C. Franco orcid.org/0000-0003-3294-6848 Department of Biology, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO, 80523 USASearch for more papers by this authorAlbina Khasanova, Albina Khasanova orcid.org/0000-0001-6652-012X Department of Integrative Biology, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, 78712 USASearch for more papers by this authorDaniel Stover, Daniel Stover US Department of Energy, Washington, DC, 20585 USASearch for more papers by this authorAdriana L. Romero-Olivares, Adriana L. Romero-Olivares orcid.org/0000-0003-0287-3043 Department of Biology, New Mexico State University, Las Cruces, NM, 88003 USASearch for more papers by this author Camille E. Defrenne, Corresponding Author Camille E. Defrenne defrennece@ornl.gov orcid.org/0000-0003-2767-4892 Climate Change Science Institute and Environmental Sciences Division, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, TN, 37830 USA Author for correspondence: email defrennece@ornl.govSearch for more papers by this authorElsa Abs, Elsa Abs orcid.org/0000-0001-9501-1412 Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of California Irvine, 321 Steinhaus, Irvine, CA, 92697 USASearch for more papers by this authorAmanda Longhi Cordeiro, Amanda Longhi Cordeiro orcid.org/0000-0001-7226-0133 Department of Ecosystem Science and Sustainability, Colorado State University, Campus Delivery 1476, Fort Collins, CO, 80523 USASearch for more papers by this authorLee Dietterich, Lee Dietterich orcid.org/0000-0003-4465-5845 Department of Ecosystem Science and Sustainability, Colorado State University, Campus Delivery 1476, Fort Collins, CO, 80523 USASearch for more papers by this authorMoira Hough, Moira Hough Department of Ecology & Evolutionary Biology, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, 85721 USASearch for more papers by this authorJennifer M. Jones, Jennifer M. Jones The Kellogg Biological Station, Michigan State University, Hickory Corners, MI, 48824 USASearch for more papers by this authorStephanie N. Kivlin, Stephanie N. Kivlin orcid.org/0000-0003-2442-7773 Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN, 37996 USASearch for more papers by this authorWeile Chen, Weile Chen orcid.org/0000-0002-3438-4036 College of Life Sciences, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, 310027 ChinaSearch for more papers by this authorDaniela Cusack, Daniela Cusack orcid.org/0000-0003-4681-7449 Department of Ecosystem Science and Sustainability, Colorado State University, Campus Delivery 1476, Fort Collins, CO, 80523 USASearch for more papers by this authorAndré L. C. Franco, André L. C. Franco orcid.org/0000-0003-3294-6848 Department of Biology, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO, 80523 USASearch for more papers by this authorAlbina Khasanova, Albina Khasanova orcid.org/0000-0001-6652-012X Department of Integrative Biology, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, 78712 USASearch for more papers by this authorDaniel Stover, Daniel Stover US Department of Energy, Washington, DC, 20585 USASearch for more papers by this authorAdriana L. Romero-Olivares, Adriana L. Romero-Olivares orcid.org/0000-0003-0287-3043 Department of Biology, New Mexico State University, Las Cruces, NM, 88003 USASearch for more papers by this author First published: 17 February 2021 https://doi.org/10.1111/nph.17163Citations: 4 Funding information: The following authors were supported by the National Science Foundation: Moira Hough (2022070 for the EMERGE Biology Integration Institute), Jennifer M. Jones (LTER, DEB 1832042), Stephanie N. Kivlin (DEB 1936195), André L.C. Franco (DEB-145663; OPP-1341648) and Albina Khasanova (Plant Genome Research Program, IOS-1444533). Weile Chen was supported by the Zhejiang Provincial Funds for Distinguished Young Scientists (LR21C030002). Adriana L. Romero-Olivares was supported by the USDA National Institute of Food and Agriculture through the New Hampshire Agricultural Experiment Station Hatch 1016142 and the Diversity & Innovation Scholars Program at the University of New Hampshire. The copyright line for this article was changed on 17 February 2021 after original online publication. AboutSectionsPDF ToolsRequest permissionExport citationAdd to favoritesTrack citation ShareShare Give accessShare full text accessShare full-text accessPlease review our Terms and Conditions of Use and check box below to share full-text version of article.I have read and accept the Wiley Online Library Terms and Conditions of UseShareable LinkUse the link below to share a full-text version of this article with your friends and colleagues. Learn more.Copy URL Share a linkShare onFacebookTwitterLinkedInRedditWechat Introduction Rising to meet global, interconnected challenges, such as food security and ecosystem resilience to global change, requires insights from across the Earth. This is especially true for belowground terrestrial ecological processes. Soil ecologists have answered this call: like mushrooms, large global datasets and databases on soil physics, chemistry and ecology are sprouting up everywhere (e.g. Fine-Root Ecology Database (Iversen et al., 2018), FunFun (Zanne et al., 2020), GlobalFungi (Větrovský et al., 2020), COntinuous SOil REspiration (Jian et al., 2020), Global distribution of earthworm diversity (Philips et al., 2019) etc.). It is now time to leverage synergies among these datasets to link the continuum of belowground processes to ecosystem functions (e.g. decomposition, nutrient cycling and soil respiration). Built on interdisciplinary and international collaborations, data synthesis that leads to a holistic understanding is one of the best ways of predicting the future of terrestrial ecosystems and for preserving ecosystem services under global change. In 2020, global interconnectedness was on display as we saw a pandemic sweep across the world in weeks. The pandemic allowed the Ecological Society of America (ESA) to enter a new digital era by holding a fully virtual conference. While technology cannot yet replicate all aspects of an in-person conference, the virtual platform increased accessibility and reduced the climate impact of the annual conference. It also provided an opportunity for early-career plant and microbial ecologists from five ESA Organized Oral Sessions and one Inspire Session to organize Ecology Underground, a two-day program of live virtual talks and open discussions on integrative belowground ecology on 4 and 5 August 2020. Ecology Underground was sponsored by New Phytologist, the ESA Soil Ecology Section, the US Department of Energy, Biological and Environmental Research program and the Oak Ridge Institute for Science and Education (ORISE), and gathered 453 participants over two days. The online platform allowed for participation across the globe (37 countries were represented; Fig. 1) and was an opportunity to think creatively about how scientific discussions and global collaborations can take place, now and in the future. Fig. 1Open in figure viewerPowerPoint The online platform of Ecology Underground allowed for participation across the globe. Building an integrative future of belowground ecology Dr Bala Chaudhary (DePaul University, IL, USA) opened Ecology Underground with her vision for the future of soil ecology and soil researchers (see her full talk here: https://vimeo.com/461592321). The discussion that followed her presentation focused on the importance of building comprehensive trait databases and of promoting Diversity, Equity and Inclusion (DEI) in STEM (Science, Technology, Engineering and Math). Building broad and inclusive communities not only increases geographic and organismal coverage of belowground ecological databases, but also creates synergies among diverse viewpoints, perspectives, and ways of thinking. For the remainder of Ecology Underground, scientists from across the globe discussed: (1) linkages among climate and microbial community and ecosystem processes in light of rapid evolution, community assembly, trait-based models and eco-evolutionary dynamics; (2) integration of microbe- and plant-focused studies to understand ecosystem responses to drought; (3) the availability of large soil datasets and how they can be applied to create mechanistic, process-based ecosystem models; (4) new methods and conceptual frameworks in root trait research; (5) expanding root trait research to understudied areas (e.g. the tropics); and (6) broadening the root economic spectrum by taking into account fungal traits. The discussions from the six sessions of Ecology Underground highlighted three broad areas of synergy across these different topics. Synergy 1: the power of trait-based approaches 'Wouldn’t it be amazing if we could predict belowground processes from drones and satellites aboveground by understanding linkages among leaf, wood, root, and microbial traits?' Colleen Iversen Trait-based approaches are an alternative to species-based approaches and place the emphasis on functional traits rather than species identities. This provides a framework for understanding how organisms affect ecosystem processes and community dynamics, by integrating functional information across species, space and time (Suding & Goldstein, 2008). Ecology Underground identified two overarching goals in applying trait-based approaches to both plant roots and free-living soil microbes: (1) identify critical functional traits driving ecosystem processes, and (2) identify trait trade-offs that help to better model these processes, (Fig. 2). Within each of these goals there remain challenges specific to belowground trait-based ecology, since lessons from aboveground trait-based ecology and resource economics theory may not be directly translatable to plant roots and soil microbes due to competition between trade-offs and environmental constraints. Fig. 2Open in figure viewerPowerPoint Diagram of key functional traits and trait trade-offs of free-living soil microbes, fine roots and mycorrhizal fungi discussed at Ecology Underground. These traits hold promise for assessing and modeling the responses of belowground processes to changing environments. Trait categories of free-living soil microbes are from Hall et al. (2018) and Zanne et al. (2020), while fine-root trait categories were extracted from Freschet et al. (2020b). Details on the trait characteristics can be found in the text. Created with BioRender (https://biorender.com/). Identifying microbial functional traits Ecology Underground identified three trait characteristics which hold promise for assessing and modeling responses of free-living microbes to changing environments: (1) traits that can be predicted from community properties or community membership (Fig. 2; Hall et al., 2018); (2) traits that can cause changes in resource allocation in response to environmental changes and selective pressures, such as how experimental warming shifts fungal resource allocation from decay to cell metabolic maintenance (Romero-Olivares et al., 2019); and (3) traits that underpin ecological guilds or strategies, such as cellulose decomposition or stress tolerance (Zanne et al., 2020). Phylogenetic signals or genome exploration for gene-level traits can be helpful for identifying traits in organisms with no cultures and unknown function. Nonetheless, it is important to pursue phylogenetically independent approaches which have proven useful for the exploration of bacterial functional trait trade-offs (e.g. evolutionary trade-off between recalcitrant carbon use and the tolerance of low nitrogen conditions; Treseder et al., 2011). Identifying belowground plant functional traits Extending fine-root trait measurements from relatively-easily measured morphological traits to include additional trait categories is key to a better understanding of belowground plant resource acquisition strategies and their relationship to ecosystem processes (Freschet et al., 2020b). Therefore, efforts should be made to investigate (4) fine-root system traits, such as fine-root mass fraction and rooting distribution (Fig. 2), and (5) traits that fall into multiple categories including fine-root dynamics (e.g. phenology), physiology (e.g. exudation, enzymatic activity), biochemistry (e.g. phosphorus content), or anatomy (e.g. cortex : stele ratio) and traits associated with mycorrhizal fungi such as mycorrhizal type, mycorrhizal colonization intensity, the exploration type of ectomycorrhizal fungi, and hyphal branching. Relationships among traits In order to mechanistically model plant and microbial mediation of global change on ecosystem processes, we must identify key relationships between plant and microbial traits. A first step is to estimate the associated costs of both plant and microbial traits and quantify the strength of their synergies and trade-offs, such as those between stress resistance and resource acquisition (e.g. between osmolyte production for drought resistance and enzyme production for organic matter decomposition). Second, it is necessary to consider the nature of the environment (e.g. constant vs fluctuating; Rodríguez-Verdugo et al., 2019) and biotic interactions (e.g. positive and negative interactions; Lee et al., 2019). In turn, relationships between fine-root functional traits have proven useful for defining plant acquisition strategies belowground. Some key frontiers in this area of research include: (1) integrating root economics with root evolution (Valverde-Barrantes et al., 2020); (2) identifying trade-offs between fine-root and mycorrhizal fungal traits and the emergent traits from their partnerships (McCormack & Iversen, 2019); (3) adopting a whole plant perspective (Weemstra et al., 2020); and (4) exploring patterns of intraspecific root and fungal trait variations (Defrenne et al., 2019). These frontiers will be crossed as we start linking root and fungal trait databases, create new databases (TraitAM, Chaudhary et al., 2020), develop novel techniques for the study of fine roots (Rhizovision, Seethepalli et al., 2020; EnRoot, Arnaud et al., 2019) and standardize root classification, sampling, processing and trait measurements (Freschet et al., 2020a). Synergy 2: mind the scale ‘We need big datasets to cross from microbiological process to macro-ecological pattern.' Colin Averill Integrating below-ground processes into Earth system models and ecological forecasts requires a better understanding of the spatial and temporal consistency and turnover in microbial communities and fine-root distribution and dynamics. Recently, the development of microbial habitat maps at the global scale (Stephanie Kivlin, University of Tennessee, USA) and the use of networks of observation sites revealed helpful ways to bridge the gap between belowground processes and macro-ecological patterns. For instance, leveraging the National Ecological Observatory Network (NEON) enabled a better understanding of aerial arbuscular mycorrhizal fungal dispersal (Chaudhary et al., 2020) and the linking of rooting depth and soil nutrient distribution at the continental scale (Mingzhen Lu, Princeton University, NJ, USA). In turn, the use of the International Co-operative Programme on Assessment and Monitoring of Air Pollution Effects on Forests (ICP Forests) made the exploration of microbial signatures at macro-ecological scales possible because it enabled pairing observations of forest growth with those of forest microbiome composition and processes (nitrogen-to-carbon metabolism; Colin Averill, ETH Zürich, Switzerland). Global biogeographical patterns appear to differ for soil invertebrates vs soil microbes, and we therefore need to examine them separately (Cameron et al., 2019). We also cannot assume that protecting aboveground organisms will be effective in protecting soil biodiversity since there is a substantial mismatch in terms of where species richness is highest for aboveground biodiversity and invertebrate soil biodiversity (Cameron et al., 2019). Furthermore, there are still large spatial and taxonomic gaps in our knowledge of soil invertebrate diversity, which introduces bias into macroecological studies (Guerra et al., 2020). Accounting for temporal variation in fine-root traits is crucial for a better understanding of belowground carbon allocation and root-fungal resource acquisition strategies. For example, shifts in root production, mortality and/or phenology: (1) informed the belowground responses to warming and hurricanes (Daniela Yaffar, Oak Ridge National laboratory, TN, USA); (2) informed mangrove responses to reforestation (Marie Arnaud, University of Leeds, UK); and (3) significantly affected the total vegetation carbon simulated by the land model portion of E3SM (Energy Exascale Earth System Model; Daniel Ricciuto, Oak Ridge National Laboratory). However, we need better empirical data to identify tractable ways of modeling fine-root phenology (Luke McCormack, Morton Arboretum, IL, USA). Temporal scaling of microorganisms also seems to be more complex than originally estimated (Kivlin et al., 2020) and it requires studies which will examine responses in relation to climatic history and current variation. For instance, precipitation variation on decadal time frames can influence drought responses in plants and microbes (Knapp et al., 2020; Veach & Zeglin, 2020). Understanding how previous environmental conditions influence ecosystem responses to disturbance is critical in the design of experiments over relevant time scales to accurately predict future ecosystem responses to climate change. Another key challenge is to understand microbial evolution and adaptation rates in the field and to better link these data to data from laboratories. To achieve this goal, we need to study the physical and climatic conditions that microbes truly experience at the micro-scale (Hall et al., 2018). Furthermore, little is known about the relative contributions of processes such as mutation and migration, or changes in the frequency of taxa or alleles that drive microbial trait variation. Efforts should be made to identify scales of variation (e.g. molecular, population, community) at which these processes operate and drive ecosystem processes (Alexander Chase, University of California, USA). Synergy 3: data integration into process-based models ‘We have decent maps of the stars in the universe; it is about time we have decent maps of microbes in our own soils.' Stephanie Kivlin Meeting the grand challenge of improving the conceptualization of microbes and plant roots in terrestrial biosphere models (modules of Earth System Models; Fig. 3, Ex III) requires that we generate trait-based ecological information belowground. This information is essential to inform inputs of models operating at different spatial and temporal scales. Furthermore, the use of models which represent multiple scales is critical to bridge the gap between soil ecological observations at locations across the globe and biosphere model predictions. Fig. 3Open in figure viewerPowerPoint Conceptual diagram of process-based models and the temporal and spatial scales at which they are used for predictions. Individual-based models: (I) explicitly conceptualize individual microbes or a single plant root and involve a high level of complexity in the description of microbial functional groups (c. 100 groups) and molecular dynamics (e.g. extracellular enzymes, osmolytes, organic polymers, etc.). In biogeochemical models (II), soil microbes are grouped by functional types (e.g. fungi and bacteria) and root distribution can be coupled with highly resolved cycling of water and nutrients within the plant–soil system. Terrestrial biosphere models (III) are modules of Earth System Models; some do not explicitly represent soil microbes, and root parameters are often fixed within and across plant functional types. Informing model input values and validating model outputs (i.e. emergent properties) requires strong collaborations among modelers and empiricists. The question of interest (see Ex I, II and III) determines the type of model used which, in turn, determines the type of empirical data (green text) needed to validate model outputs. Eventually, emergent properties of models operating at lower scales may become inputs or inform the conceptualization of model processes for models operating at higher scales. Created with BioRender (https://biorender.com/). Model selection depends on the question of interest (Fig. 3, Ex I–III) and determines the type of empirical data needed for model parameterization and validation. For example, individually based models can be used to test the outcome of interactions between microbial taxa (Allison et al., 2010), the effect of evolving microbial strains on local decomposition (Fig. 3, Ex I; Abs et al., 2020), or drought legacy in soil microbiomes (Steven Allison and Bin Wang, University of California, USA ). Biogeochemical models focus on highly-resolved biogeochemical cycling within an ecosystem and are therefore useful to investigate processes related to changes in soil carbon in response to environmental changes, for example by integrating microbial functional groups (MIcrobial-MIneral Carbon Stabilization (MIMICS) model; Wieder et al., 2015) or the protection of soil organic matter (Sulman et al., 2014). Eventually, emergent properties of biogeochemical models such as the decomposition rates of microbial functional groups may become inputs for terrestrial biosphere models, in which microbes are not explicitly represented (yet) and where fine-root traits (e.g. rooting depth distribution, carbon-to-nitrogen ratio) have fixed parameters across plant functional types (Iversen et al., 2017). Informing model input values and validating model outputs requires strong collaborations between modelers and empiricists. Modelers using individual-based models need empiricists to provide them with a simple framework for microbial traits, by, for example, linking microbial diversity and ecosystem processes (e.g. Mark Anthony and Colin Averill, ETH Zürich, Switzerland ) or connecting descriptive diversity patterns and community traits to community level functions (e.g. Romero-Olivares et al., 2019). Modelers also need empiricists to (1) pair measurements of interest with those that models require; for example, effort should be made to pair measurements of fine-root morphology and chemistry with fine-root function, and (2) provide them with microbial trait trade-offs or range limits for a given trait (Abs et al., 2020). Empirical data such as local carbon dioxide emissions or community-level microbial biomass can be important to validate the emergent properties of individual-based models while measurements such as ecosystem-level net primary production or soil decomposition rates over time in long-term warming experiments (Melillo et al., 2017) or nitrogen addition experiments (Morrison et al., 2018), can be needed to validate biogeochemical model outputs. Lastly, terrestrial biosphere models require large scale data (e.g. the Harmonized World Soil Database, FAO, 2012) and/or emergent properties from biogeochemical models for both model parameterization and model evaluation or validation. However, caution should be used when relying on inverse modeling (i.e. tuning models to match large scale data) because important fine-scale mechanisms may be overlooked. Building an inclusive future of belowground ecologists ‘We cannot perform global ecology without embracing the diversity of scientists around the globe.' Bala Chaudhary The events that occurred in May and June 2020 in the USA and around the world (e.g. the murder of George Floyd, Black Lives Matter marches and demonstrations, #BlackInTheIvory, #ShutDownSTEM, #ShutDownAcademia, etc.) called new attention to the need for anti-racism in STEM. Recent efforts towards promoting Black, Indigenous, and People of Color (BIPOC) in STEM include: (1) encouraging the scientific community to build anti-racist labs (Chaudhary & Berhe, 2020); (2) promoting Black excellence in ecology and evolution (Schell et al., 2020); (3) helping BIPOC students to engage in conservation science (Doris Duke Conservation Scholars Program at the University of Washington); and (4) supporting scientists who self-identify as women of color and work in ecology, evolutionary biology or allied fields (e.g. WOCinEEB slack online community, created by Bala Chaudhary, wocineeb@gmail.com; or Halsey et al., 2020). These efforts are necessary because BIPOC are underrepresented in environmental fields worldwide (e.g. Taylor, 2015) despite demonstrating high environmental concern and having strong motivations such as achieving ecological and social well-being in their communities (Tania Schusler, Loyola University of Chicago, IL, USA). Science and equity are interdependent – research shows more diverse groups produce more novel ideas (Hofstra et al., 2020), therefore, scientific communities should be diverse at all levels (e.g. students, early-career researchers, faculty members). In addition, actions promoting DEI should primarily be carried out by people in power such as faculty members and leaders, and the onus should not be on graduate students or BIPOC themselves, although their contributions should be welcomed and valued. To value the scientific expertise and important perspectives of PEERs’ (Persons Excluded because of their Ethnicity or Race), departments must actively support them speaking about their science as well as their experiences navigating STEM and support them serving on both scientific and diversity committees. In order to increase DEI in STEM, one can create new programs that integrate science and DEI or create new funding opportunities that specifically require applicants to integrate science and DEI. Furthermore, organizations should be intentional about recruiting BIPOC students and faculty members instead of simply removing ‘roadblocks’ such as application fees. Similarly, they must be intentional about supporting the people they recruit such as taking steps to create communities of BIPOC, and hiring BIPOC in clusters to avoid feelings of isolation and exclusion in white-dominated spaces. Lastly, future events would be greatly improved if organizers: (1) have conversations about DEI early and throughout the process to ensure that the team has a shared knowledge and vision, and can act on that vision throughout the organizing process; (2) include PEERs co-organizers and speakers as this would help create synergies among ways of thinking (e.g. Hagan et al., 2020); and (3) encourage organizations to advertise, including scientific societies focused on representing PEERs in STEM (e.g. Society for Advancement of Chicanos/Hispanics & Native Americans in Science – SACNAS). Conclusions In a world of social distancing to slow the spread of a global pandemic, collaborative and critical scientific conversations can still happen via online meetings. Through two days of online synchronous presentations and discussion that leveraged sessions proposed within the ESA framework, Ecology Underground identified three critical areas of belowground ecology that need further research: (1) the use of trait-based approaches for linking plants, microbes, and ecosystem processes; (2) the identification of relevant spatial and temporal scales for studies in belowground ecology; and (3) the development of models that connect microscale dynamics to predict belowground processes globally. Advancement of these research areas will require strong global networks, cross-disciplinary collaboration, and a diversity of perspectives only achievable through a diverse community of ecologists. Creating su
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
-
Issues and Prospects of Belowground Ecology with Special Reference to Global Climate Change
Jinsheng He,Zhengquan Wang,Jingyun Fang
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/bf03184277
2004-01-01
Chinese Science Bulletin
Abstract:The theory of ecology is based on over 100 a of research and investigation, all centered on aboveground patterns and processes. However, as contemporary ecologists are increasingly acknowledging, belowground structures, functions, and processes are some of the most poorly understood areas in ecology. This lack of understanding of belowground ecological processes seriously restricts the advance of global change research. The interdisciplinary field of belowground ecology began to flourish in the 1990s, along with the expansion of global change research, and quickly gained momentum. Belowground ecology aims to investigate belowground structures, functions, and processes, as well as their relationships with corresponding aboveground features, emphasizing the responses of belowground systems under global change conditions. Key research areas include root ecology, belowground animals, and soil microorganisms. This review summarizes and analyzes the relationships between above- and belowground ecosystems, root ecology, root biogeography, belowground biodiversity, as well as research areas with particular challenges and progress. This commentary emphasizes certain theoretical issues concerning the responses of belowground processes to global change, and concludes that belowground ecology is a critical research priority in the 21st century.
-
Challenges in upscaling laboratory studies to ecosystems in soil microbiology research
Ji Chen,Yong Zhang,Yakov Kuzyakov,Dong Wang,Jørgen Eivind Olesen
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.16537
IF: 11.6
2022-11-30
Global Change Biology
Abstract:The rapid technological advancements for high‐throughput sequencing and omics analyses have enabled soil microbiology to enter into a big data era across the ever‐increasing temporal and spatial scales. However, there are significant dilemmas when bridging laboratory‐, field‐, and model‐based data sources for an advanced understanding of soil microbiology. We discussed the reasons for the dilemmas and proposed several suggestions for the future research priorities. These dilemmas should motivate interdisciplinary collaboration across experimental, observational, theoretic, and modeling research. Soil microbiology has entered into the big data era, but the challenges in bridging laboratory‐, field‐, and model‐based studies of ecosystem functions still remain. Indeed, the limitation of factors in laboratory experiments disregards interactions of a broad range of in situ environmental drivers leading to frequent contradictions between laboratory‐ and field‐based studies, which may consequently mislead model development and projections. Upscaling soil microbiology research from laboratory to ecosystems represents one of the grand challenges facing environmental scientists, but with great potential to inform policymakers toward climate‐smart and resource‐efficient ecosystems. The upscaling is not only a scale problem, but also requires disentangling functional relationships and processes on each level. We point to three potential reasons for the gaps between laboratory‐ and field‐based studies (i.e., spatiotemporal dynamics, sampling disturbances, and plant–soil–microbial feedbacks), and three key issues of caution when bridging observations and model predictions (i.e., across‐scale effect, complex‐process coupling, and multi‐factor regulation). Field‐based studies only cover a limited range of environmental variation that must be supplemented by laboratory and mesocosm manipulative studies when revealing the underlying mechanisms. The knowledge gaps in upscaling soil microbiology from laboratory to ecosystems should motivate interdisciplinary collaboration across experimental, observational, theoretic, and modeling research.
environmental sciences,biodiversity conservation,ecology
-
Genomic fingerprints of the world's soil ecosystems
Emily B. Graham,Vanessa A. Garayburu-Caruso,Ruonan Wu,Jianqiu Zheng,Ryan McClure,Gerrad D. Jones
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1128/msystems.01112-23
2024-05-10
mSystems
Abstract:ABSTRACT Despite the explosion of soil metagenomic data, we lack a synthesized understanding of patterns in the distribution and functions of soil microorganisms. These patterns are critical to predictions of soil microbiome responses to climate change and resulting feedbacks that regulate greenhouse gas release from soils. To address this gap, we assay 1,512 manually curated soil metagenomes using complementary annotation databases, read-based taxonomy, and machine learning to extract multidimensional genomic fingerprints of global soil microbiomes. Our objective is to uncover novel biogeographical patterns of soil microbiomes across environmental factors and ecological biomes with high molecular resolution. We reveal shifts in the potential for (i) microbial nutrient acquisition across pH gradients; (ii) stress-, transport-, and redox-based processes across changes in soil bulk density; and (iii) greenhouse gas emissions across biomes. We also use an unsupervised approach to reveal a collection of soils with distinct genomic signatures, characterized by coordinated changes in soil organic carbon, nitrogen, and cation exchange capacity and in bulk density and clay content that may ultimately reflect soil environments with high microbial activity. Genomic fingerprints for these soils highlight the importance of resource scavenging, plant-microbe interactions, fungi, and heterotrophic metabolisms. Across all analyses, we observed phylogenetic coherence in soil microbiomes—more closely related microorganisms tended to move congruently in response to soil factors. Collectively, the genomic fingerprints uncovered here present a basis for global patterns in the microbial mechanisms underlying soil biogeochemistry and help beget tractable microbial reaction networks for incorporation into process-based models of soil carbon and nutrient cycling. IMPORTANCE We address a critical gap in our understanding of soil microorganisms and their functions, which have a profound impact on our environment. We analyzed 1,512 global soils with advanced analytics to create detailed genetic profiles (fingerprints) of soil microbiomes. Our work reveals novel patterns in how microorganisms are distributed across different soil environments. For instance, we discovered shifts in microbial potential to acquire nutrients in relation to soil acidity, as well as changes in stress responses and potential greenhouse gas emissions linked to soil structure. We also identified soils with putative high activity that had unique genomic characteristics surrounding resource acquisition, plant-microbe interactions, and fungal activity. Finally, we observed that closely related microorganisms tend to respond in similar ways to changes in their surroundings. Our work is a significant step toward comprehending the intricate world of soil microorganisms and its role in the global climate.
microbiology
-
Key Edaphic Properties Largely Explain Temporal and Geographic Variation in Soil Microbial Communities across Four Biomes
Kathryn M Docherty,Hannah M Borton,Noelle Espinosa,Martha Gebhardt,Juliana Gil-Loaiza,Jessica L M Gutknecht,Patrick W Maes,Brendon M Mott,John Jacob Parnell,Gayle Purdy,Pedro A P Rodrigues,Lee F Stanish,Olivia N Walser,Rachel E Gallery
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0135352
IF: 3.7
2015-11-04
PLoS ONE
Abstract:Soil microbial communities play a critical role in nutrient transformation and storage in all ecosystems. Quantifying the seasonal and long-term temporal extent of genetic and functional variation of soil microorganisms in response to biotic and abiotic changes within and across ecosystems will inform our understanding of the effect of climate change on these processes. We examined spatial and seasonal variation in microbial communities based on 16S rRNA gene sequencing and phospholipid fatty acid (PLFA) composition across four biomes: a tropical broadleaf forest (Hawaii), taiga (Alaska), semiarid grassland-shrubland (Utah), and a subtropical coniferous forest (Florida). In this study, we used a team-based instructional approach leveraging the iPlant Collaborative to examine publicly available National Ecological Observatory Network (NEON) 16S gene and PLFA measurements that quantify microbial diversity, composition, and growth. Both profiling techniques revealed that microbial communities grouped strongly by ecosystem and were predominately influenced by three edaphic factors: pH, soil water content, and cation exchange capacity. Temporal variability of microbial communities differed by profiling technique; 16S-based community measurements showed significant temporal variability only in the subtropical coniferous forest communities, specifically through changes within subgroups of Acidobacteria. Conversely, PLFA-based community measurements showed seasonal shifts in taiga and tropical broadleaf forest systems. These differences may be due to the premise that 16S-based measurements are predominantly influenced by large shifts in the abiotic soil environment, while PLFA-based analyses reflect the metabolically active fraction of the microbial community, which is more sensitive to local disturbances and biotic interactions. To address the technical issue of the response of soil microbial communities to sample storage temperature, we compared 16S-based community structure in soils stored at -80°C and -20°C and found no significant differences in community composition based on storage temperature. Free, open access datasets and data sharing platforms are powerful tools for integrating research and teaching in undergraduate and graduate student classrooms. They are a valuable resource for fostering interdisciplinary collaborations, testing ecological theory, model development and validation, and generating novel hypotheses. Training in data analysis and interpretation of large datasets in university classrooms through project-based learning improves the learning experience for students and enables their use of these significant resources throughout their careers.
-
The underestimated global importance of plant belowground coarse organs in open biomes for ecosystem functioning and conservation
Gianluigi Ottaviani,Jitka Klimešová,Tristan Charles-Dominique,Mathieu Millan,Timothy Harris,Fernando A.O. Silveira
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pecon.2024.01.008
IF: 5.652
2024-02-07
Perspectives in Ecology and Conservation
Abstract:Highlights • Open biomes cover ∼60% of land worldwide, and are associated with many biodiversity hotspots. • There, plants typically allocate most biomass belowground, yet functional roles of belowground coarse organs are overlooked. • Perenniality and decomposability of belowground coarse organs can differ greatly from that of fine roots. • We call for the inclusion of belowground coarse organs and their functions, especially in carbon cycling research. • Such inclusive approach can refine mitigation policies and our view on the functioning and conservation of open biomes. Open biomes such as grasslands, savannas, shrublands are associated with many global biodiversity hotspots, and cover ∼60% of land globally. Yet, extensive and increasing anthropogenic activities threaten their functioning and biodiversity. Here, we argue that, in open biomes, researchers and stakeholders (e.g., policy-makers, practitioners) should more comprehensively acknowledge that more than half of a plant's biomass is typically located belowground. Not only fine roots but different belowground coarse organs of plants (e.g., thick roots, rhizomes) play key ecosystem functions that have been largely neglected in basic and applied ecology. By more accurately accounting for the distribution of these organs along ecological gradients, their biomass turnover and decomposition rate, we would improve estimates of carbon cycling (core in climate change mitigation policies) as well as ameliorating conservation efforts focused on open biomes worldwide. Graphical abstract Download : Download high-res image (261KB) Download : Download full-size image
biodiversity conservation
-
Increasing the spatial and temporal impact of ecological research: A roadmap for integrating a novel terrestrial process into an Earth system model
Emily Kyker‐Snowman,Danica L. Lombardozzi,Gordon B. Bonan,Susan J. Cheng,Jeffrey S. Dukes,Serita D. Frey,Elin M. Jacobs,Risa McNellis,Joshua M. Rady,Nicholas G. Smith,R. Quinn Thomas,William R. Wieder,A. Stuart Grandy
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.15894
IF: 11.6
2021-10-14
Global Change Biology
Abstract:Terrestrial ecosystems regulate Earth's climate through water, energy, and biogeochemical transformations. Despite a key role in regulating the Earth system, terrestrial ecology has historically been underrepresented in the Earth system models (ESMs) that are used to understand and project global environmental change. Ecology and Earth system modeling must be integrated for scientists to fully comprehend the role of ecological systems in driving and responding to global change. Ecological insights can improve ESM realism and reduce process uncertainty, while ESMs offer ecologists an opportunity to broadly test ecological theory and increase the impact of their work by scaling concepts through time and space. Despite this mutualism, meaningfully integrating the two remains a persistent challenge, in part because of logistical obstacles in translating processes into mathematical formulas and identifying ways to integrate new theories and code into large, complex model structures. To help overcome this interdisciplinary challenge, we present a framework consisting of a series of interconnected stages for integrating a new ecological process or insight into an ESM. First, we highlight the multiple ways that ecological observations and modeling iteratively strengthen one another, dispelling the illusion that the ecologist's role ends with initial provision of data. Second, we show that many valuable insights, products, and theoretical developments are produced through sustained interdisciplinary collaborations between empiricists and modelers, regardless of eventual inclusion of a process in an ESM. Finally, we provide concrete actions and resources to facilitate learning and collaboration at every stage of data-model integration. This framework will create synergies that will transform our understanding of ecology within the Earth system, ultimately improving our understanding of global environmental change and broadening the impact of ecological research.
environmental sciences,biodiversity conservation,ecology
-
Decoupled Responses of Plants and Soil Biota to Global Change Across the World’s Land Ecosystems
Qingshui Yu,Chenqi He,Mark A Anthony,Bernhard Schmid,Arthur Gessler,Chen Yang,Danhua Zhang,Xiaofeng Ni,Yuhao Feng,Jiangling Zhu,Biao Zhu,Shaopeng Wang,Chengjun Ji,Zhiyao Tang,Jin Wu,Pete Smith,Lingli Liu,Mai-He Li,Marcus Schaub,Jingyun Fang
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-024-54304-z
IF: 16.6
2024-01-01
Nature Communications
Abstract:Understanding the concurrent responses of aboveground and belowground biota compartments to global changes is crucial for the maintenance of ecosystem functions and biodiversity conservation. We conduct a comprehensive analysis synthesizing data from 13,209 single observations and 3223 pairwise observations from 1166 publications across the world terrestrial ecosystems to examine the responses of plants and soil organisms and their synchronization. We find that global change factors (GCFs) generally promote plant biomass but decreased plant species diversity. In comparison, the responses of belowground soil biota to GCFs are more variable and harder to predict. The analysis of the paired aboveground and belowground observations demonstrate that responses of plants and soil organisms to GCFs are decoupled among diverse groups of soil organisms for different biomes. Our study highlights the importance of integrative research on the aboveground-belowground system for improving predictions regarding the consequences of global environmental change.
-
Zones of influence for soil organic matter dynamics: A conceptual framework for data and models
Claudia Cagnarini,Eleanor Blyth,Bridget A Emmett,Chris D Evans,Robert I Griffiths,Aidan Keith,Laurence Jones,Inma Lebron,Niall P McNamara,Jeremy Puissant,Sabine Reinsch,David A Robinson,Edwin C Rowe,Amy R C Thomas,Simon M Smart,Jeanette Whitaker,Bernard J Cosby
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.14787
Abstract:Soil organic matter (SOM) is an indicator of sustainable land management as stated in the global indicator framework of the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals (SDG Indicator 15.3.1). Improved forecasting of future changes in SOM is needed to support the development of more sustainable land management under a changing climate. Current models fail to reproduce historical trends in SOM both within and during transition between ecosystems. More realistic spatio-temporal SOM dynamics require inclusion of the recent paradigm shift from SOM recalcitrance as an 'intrinsic property' to SOM persistence as an 'ecosystem interaction'. We present a soil profile, or pedon-explicit, ecosystem-scale framework for data and models of SOM distribution and dynamics which can better represent land use transitions. Ecosystem-scale drivers are integrated with pedon-scale processes in two zones of influence. In the upper vegetation zone, SOM is affected primarily by plant inputs (above- and belowground), climate, microbial activity and physical aggregation and is prone to destabilization. In the lower mineral matrix zone, SOM inputs from the vegetation zone are controlled primarily by mineral phase and chemical interactions, resulting in more favourable conditions for SOM persistence. Vegetation zone boundary conditions vary spatially at landscape scales (vegetation cover) and temporally at decadal scales (climate). Mineral matrix zone boundary conditions vary spatially at landscape scales (geology, topography) but change only slowly. The thicknesses of the two zones and their transport connectivity are dynamic and affected by plant cover, land use practices, climate and feedbacks from current SOM stock in each layer. Using this framework, we identify several areas where greater knowledge is needed to advance the emerging paradigm of SOM dynamics-improved representation of plant-derived carbon inputs, contributions of soil biota to SOM storage and effect of dynamic soil structure on SOM storage-and how this can be combined with robust and efficient soil monitoring.
-
Toward a global platform for linking soil biodiversity data
Kelly S. Ramirez,Markus Döring,Nico Eisenhauer,Ciro Gardi,Josh Ladau,Jonathan W. Leff,Guillaume Lentendu,Zoë Lindo,Matthias C. Rillig,David Russell,Stefan Scheu,Mark G. St. John,Franciska T. de Vries,Tesfaye Wubet,Wim H. van der Putten,Diana H. Wall
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fevo.2015.00091
IF: 3
2015-07-30
Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution
Abstract:Soil biodiversity is immense, with an estimated 10–100 million organisms belonging to over 5000 taxa in a handful of soil. In spite of the importance of soil biodiversity for ecosystem functions and services, information on soil species, from taxonomy to biogeographical patterns, is incomplete and there is no infrastructure to connect pre-existing or future data. Here, we propose a global platform to allow for greater access to soil biodiversity information by linking databases and repositories through a single open portal. The proposed platform would for the first time, link data on soil organisms from different global sites and biomes, and will be inclusive of all data types, from molecular sequences to morphology measurements and other supporting information. Access to soil biodiversity species records and information will be instrumental to progressing scientific research and education. Further, as demonstrated by previous biodiversity synthesis efforts, data availability is key for adapting to, and creating mitigation plans in response to global changes. With the rapid influx of soil biodiversity data, now is the time to take the first steps forward in establishing a global soil biodiversity information platform.
ecology
-
Genomic fingerprints of the world’s soil ecosystems
Emily B. Graham,Vanessa A. Garayburu-Caruso,Ruonan Wu,Jianqiu Zheng,Ryan McClure,Gerrad Jones
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1101/2023.11.02.563126
2024-03-09
Abstract:Despite the explosion of soil metagenomic data, we lack a synthesized understanding of patterns in the distribution and functions of soil microorganisms. These patterns are critical to predictions of soil microbiome responses to climate change and resulting feedbacks that regulate greenhouse gas release from soils. To address this gap, we assay 1512 manually-curated soil metagenomes using complementary annotation databases, read-based taxonomy, and machine learning to extract multidimensional genomic fingerprints of global soil microbiomes. Our objective is to uncover novel biogeographical patterns of soil microbiomes across environmental factors and ecological biomes with high molecular resolution. We reveal shifts in the potential for ( ) microbial nutrient acquisition across pH gradients; ( ) stress, transport, and redox-based processes across changes in soil bulk density; and ( ) greenhouse gas emissions across biomes. We also use an unsupervised approach to reveal a collection of soils with distinct genomic signatures, characterized by coordinated changes in soil organic carbon, nitrogen, and cation exchange capacity and in bulk density and clay content that may ultimately reflect soil environments with high microbial activity. Genomic fingerprints for these soils highlight the importance of resource scavenging, plant-microbe interactions, fungi, and heterotrophic metabolisms. Across all analyses, we observed phylogenetic coherence in soil microbiomes –– more closely related microorganisms tended to move congruently in response to soil factors. Collectively, the genomic fingerprints uncovered here present a basis for global patterns in the microbial mechanisms underlying soil biogeochemistry and help beget tractable microbial reaction networks for incorporation into process-based models of soil carbon and nutrient cycling.
Ecology
-
Frontiers in root ecology: recent advances and future challenges
Amandine Erktan,M. Luke McCormack,Catherine Roumet
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-018-3618-5
IF: 4.993
2018-03-01
Plant and Soil
Abstract:BackgroundRoots play a pivotal role in defining plant ecological success and mediating terrestrial ecosystem functioning. However, roots are difficult to study as they are hidden in the soil matrix and express a plurality of forms and functions: nutrient acquisition, anchorage, nutrient and water transport.ScopeIn this special issue, we gather 20 articles from emerging topics in root ecology. We specifically focus on five frontiers that are essential to better capture plant, soil and ecosystem processes: (1) root structure and soil resource acquisition; (2) root dynamics; (3) root-root interactions; (4) root-microbe interactions and (5) the effects of roots on soil properties. For each of these sections we provide an overview of our current knowledge, highlight the contributions of this special issue, and pinpoint key remaining challenges for future work.ConclusionsRoot resource acquisition, root dynamics, root-root and root-microbes interaction and the relative importance of root vs. soil properties on soil aggregation were shown to vary among biomes, soil and climate conditions. Such variability gives a complex but realistic picture of root functioning in real ecosystems and lays an important foundation for future work identify broad patterns of root functioning.
plant sciences,soil science,agronomy
-
New insights to be gained from a Virtual Ecosystem
Robert M. Ewers,Jacob Cook,Olivia Daniel,David Orme,Vivienne Groner,Jaideep Joshi,Anna Rallings,Taran Rallings,Priyanga Amarasekare
DOI: https://doi.org/10.32942/x26w5b
IF: 3.1
2024-09-17
Ecological Modelling
Abstract:The myriad interactions among individual plants, animals, microbes and their abiotic environment generate emergent phenomena that will determine the future of life on Earth. Here, we argue that holistic ecosystem models – incorporating key biological domains and feedbacks between biotic and abiotic processes – capable of predicting emergent phenomena are required if we are to understand the functioning of complex, terrestrial ecosystems in a rapidly changing planet. We argue that holistic ecosystem models will provide a framework for integrating the many approaches used to study ecosystems, including biodiversity science, population and community ecology, soil science, biogeochemistry, hydrology and climatology. Holistic models will provide new insights into the nature and importance of feedbacks that cut across scales of space and time, and that connect ecosystem domains such as microbes and animals or above and below ground. They will allow us to critically examine the origins and maintenance of ecosystem stability, resilience and sustainability through the lens of systems theory, and provide a much-needed boost for conservation and the management of natural environments. We outline our approach to developing a holistic ecosystem model – the Virtual Ecosystem – and argue that while the construction of such complex models is obviously ambitious, it is both feasible and necessary.
ecology
-
Decoupled responses of plants and soil biota to global change across the world's land ecosystems
Qingshui Yu,Chenqi He,Mark A. Anthony,Bernhard Schmid,Arthur Gessler,Chen Yang,Danhua Zhang,Xiaofeng Ni,Yuhao Feng,Jiangling Zhu,Biao Zhu,Shaopeng Wang,Chengjun Ji,Zhiyao Tang,Jin Wu,Pete Smith,Lingli Liu,Mai-He Li,Marcus Schaub,Jingyun Fang
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-024-54304-z
IF: 16.6
2024-11-29
Nature Communications
Abstract:Understanding the concurrent responses of aboveground and belowground biota compartments to global changes is crucial for the maintenance of ecosystem functions and biodiversity conservation. We conduct a comprehensive analysis synthesizing data from 13,209 single observations and 3223 pairwise observations from 1166 publications across the world terrestrial ecosystems to examine the responses of plants and soil organisms and their synchronization. We find that global change factors (GCFs) generally promote plant biomass but decreased plant species diversity. In comparison, the responses of belowground soil biota to GCFs are more variable and harder to predict. The analysis of the paired aboveground and belowground observations demonstrate that responses of plants and soil organisms to GCFs are decoupled among diverse groups of soil organisms for different biomes. Our study highlights the importance of integrative research on the aboveground-belowground system for improving predictions regarding the consequences of global environmental change.
multidisciplinary sciences
-
Functional Molecular Ecological Networks
Jizhong Zhou,Ye Deng,Feng Luo,Zhili He,Qichao Tu,Xiaoyang Zhi
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1128/mbio.00169-10
2013-01-01
Abstract:ABSTRACT Biodiversity and its responses to environmental changes are central issues in ecology and for society. Almost all microbial biodiversity research focuses on “species” richness and abundance but not on their interactions. Although a network approach is powerful in describing ecological interactions among species, defining the network structure in a microbial community is a great challenge. Also, although the stimulating effects of elevated CO2 (eCO2) on plant growth and primary productivity are well established, its influences on belowground microbial communities, especially microbial interactions, are poorly understood. Here, a random matrix theory (RMT)-based conceptual framework for identifying functional molecular ecological networks was developed with the high-throughput functional gene array hybridization data of soil microbial communities in a long-term grassland FACE (free air, CO2 enrichment) experiment. Our results indicate that RMT is powerful in identifying functional molecular ecological networks in microbial communities. Both functional molecular ecological networks under eCO2 and ambient CO2 (aCO2) possessed the general characteristics of complex systems such as scale free, small world, modular, and hierarchical. However, the topological structures of the functional molecular ecological networks are distinctly different between eCO2 and aCO2, at the levels of the entire communities, individual functional gene categories/groups, and functional genes/sequences, suggesting that eCO2 dramatically altered the network interactions among different microbial functional genes/populations. Such a shift in network structure is also significantly correlated with soil geochemical variables. In short, elucidating network interactions in microbial communities and their responses to environmental changes is fundamentally important for research in microbial ecology, systems microbiology, and global change. IMPORTANCE Microorganisms are the foundation of the Earth's biosphere and play integral and unique roles in various ecosystem processes and functions. In an ecosystem, various microorganisms interact with each other to form complicated networks. Elucidating network interactions and their responses to environmental changes is difficult due to the lack of appropriate experimental data and an appropriate theoretical framework. This study provides a conceptual framework to construct interaction networks in microbial communities based on high-throughput functional gene array hybridization data. It also first documents that elevated carbon dioxide in the atmosphere dramatically alters the network interactions in soil microbial communities, which could have important implications in assessing the responses of ecosystems to climate change. The conceptual framework developed allows microbiologists to address research questions unapproachable previously by focusing on network interactions beyond the listing of, e.g., the number and abundance of species. Thus, this study could represent transformative research and a paradigm shift in microbial ecology.
-
A continental strategy for the National Ecological Observatory Network
D. Schimel,W. Hargrove,M. Keller,F. Hoffman
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1890/1540-9295(2008)6[282:ACSFTN]2.0.CO;2
2008-06-01
Abstract:O ne of the great realizations of the past half-century in both biological and Earth sciences is that, throughout geologic time, life has been shaping the Earth's surface and regulating the chemistry of its oceans and atmosphere (eg Berkner and Marshall 1964). In the present Anthropocene Era (Crutzen and Steffen 2003; Ruddiman 2003), humanity is directly shaping the bios-phere and physical environment, triggering potentially devastating and currently unpredictable consequences (Doney and Schimel 2007). While subtle interactions between the Earth's orbit, ocean circulation, and the biosphere have dominated climate feedbacks for eons, now human perturbations to the cycles of CO 2 , other trace gases, and aerosols regulate the pace of climate change. Accompanying the biogeochemical perturbations are the vast changes resulting from biodiversity loss and a profound rearrangement of the biosphere due to species movements and invasions. Scientists and managers of biological resources require a stronger basis for forecasting the consequences of such changes. In this Special Issue of Frontiers, the scientific community confronts the challenge of research and environmental management in a human-dominated, increasingly connected world (Peters et al. p 229). Carbon dioxide, a key driver of climate change produced by a host of local and small-scale processes (eg clearing of forests, extraction and use of fossil fuels), affects the global energy balance (Marshall et al. p 273). Invasive species, though small from a large-scale perspective, nonetheless modify the continental biosphere (Crowl et al. p 238). Aquatic systems are tightly coupled to both terrestrial systems and the marine environment (Hopkinson et al. p 255). Flowing water not only intrinsically creates a highly connected system, but acts a transducer of climate, land-use, and invasive species effects, spreading their impacts from terrestrial and upstream centers of action downstream and into distant systems (Williamson et al. p 247). Human activities such as urbanization create new connections; materials, organisms, and energy flow into cities from globally distributed sources and waste products are exported back into the environment (Grimm et al. p 264). All of the papers in this issue of Frontiers conclude that a new approach to studying the biosphere is required in the present era. In response to this challenge, with the support of the National Science Foundation (NSF), ecologists in the US are planning a National Ecological Observatory Network (NEON). The conceptual design of this network (Field et al. 2006) gives rise to several general questions: (1) How will the ecosystems …
Geology,Environmental Science
-
Embracing the unknown: disentangling the complexities of the soil microbiome
Noah Fierer
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nrmicro.2017.87
IF: 88.1
2017-08-21
Nature Reviews Microbiology
Abstract:Key PointsSoils can contain large amounts of microbial biomass, including fungi, protists, viruses, bacteria and archaea. Most of these taxa currently remain undescribed, and have physiological and ecological attributes that are unknown.Soil microbial communities are highly diverse, in part because soil environmental conditions are so heterogeneous. In a single soil there is a wide range of distinct microbial habitats that contain unique microbial assemblages.Spatial variability in the structure of soil microbial communities is typically larger than the temporal variability. The composition of soil bacterial communities and the abundances of specific taxa are often predictable from soil and site characteristics, including soil pH, climate and organic carbon availability.Plants can clearly have important direct or indirect effects on soil microbial communities and vice versa. However, the effects of plant species on microbial taxa are often difficult to predict a priori owing, in part, to plant associations with soil microorganisms being highly context-dependent.Linking specific soil microbial processes to specific microbial taxa remains difficult. One way to tackle this problem is to use genomic data to group microbial taxa according to shared similar life-history strategies and functional attributes.Given recent methodological and conceptual advances, the field is poised to rapidly advance our understanding of the soil microbiome. Promising future research directions include cultivation-based analyses of soil microbial taxa, studies of soil viruses and investigations into the importance of horizontal gene transfer in shaping the soil microbiome.
microbiology
-
A Belowground Perspective on the Nexus Between Biodiversity Change, Climate Change, and Human Well‐being
Nico Eisenhauer,Karin Frank,Alexandra Weigelt,Bartosz Bartkowski,Rémy Beugnon,Katja Liebal,Miguel Mahecha,Martin Quaas,Djamil Al‐Halbouni,Ana Bastos,Friedrich J. Bohn,Mariana Madruga deBrito,Joachim Denzler,Hannes Feilhauer,Rico Fischer,Immo Fritsche,Claudia Guimaraes‐Steinicke,Martin Hänsel,Daniel B. M. Haun,Hartmut Herrmann,Andreas Huth,Heike Kalesse‐Los,Michael Koetter,Nina Kolleck,Melanie Krause,Marlene Kretschmer,Pedro J. Leitão,Torsten Masson,Karin Mora,Birgit Müller,Jian Peng,Mira L. Pöhlker,Leonie Ratzke,Markus Reichstein,Solveig Richter,Nadja Rüger,Beatriz Sánchez‐Parra,Maha Shadaydeh,Sebastian Sippel,Ina Tegen,Daniela Thrän,Josefine Umlauft,Manfred Wendisch,Kevin Wolf,Christian Wirth,Hannes Zacher,Sönke Zaehle,Johannes Quaas
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/sae2.12108
2024-01-01
Journal of Sustainable Agriculture and Environment
Abstract:Abstract Soil is central to the complex interplay among biodiversity, climate, and society. This paper examines the interconnectedness of soil biodiversity, climate change, and societal impacts, emphasizing the urgent need for integrated solutions. Human‐induced biodiversity loss and climate change intensify environmental degradation, threatening human well‐being. Soils, rich in biodiversity and vital for ecosystem function regulation, are highly vulnerable to these pressures, affecting nutrient cycling, soil fertility, and resilience. Soil also crucially regulates climate, influencing energy, water cycles, and carbon storage. Yet, climate change poses significant challenges to soil health and carbon dynamics, amplifying global warming. Integrated approaches are essential, including sustainable land management, policy interventions, technological innovations, and societal engagement. Practices like agroforestry and organic farming improve soil health and mitigate climate impacts. Effective policies and governance are crucial for promoting sustainable practices and soil conservation. Recent technologies aid in monitoring soil biodiversity and implementing sustainable land management. Societal engagement, through education and collective action, is vital for environmental stewardship. By prioritizing interdisciplinary research and addressing key frontiers, scientists can advance understanding of the soil biodiversity–climate change–society nexus, informing strategies for environmental sustainability and social equity.
-
GRASSROOTS ECOLOGY: PLANT–MICROBE–SOIL INTERACTIONS AS DRIVERS OF PLANT COMMUNITY STRUCTURE AND DYNAMICS
Heather L. Reynolds,Alissa Packer,James D. Bever,Keith Clay
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1890/02-0298
IF: 4.8
2003-09-01
Ecology
Abstract:A growing body of research on plant–microbe interactions in soil is contributing to the development of a new, microbially based perspective on plant community ecology. Soil‐dwelling microorganisms are diverse, and interactions with plants vary with respect to specificity, environmental heterogeneity, and fitness impact. Two microbial processes that may exert key influences on plant community structure and dynamics are microbial mediation of niche differentiation in resource use and feedback dynamics between the plant and soil community. The niche differentiation hypothesis is based on observations that soil nutrients occur in different chemical forms, that different enzymes are required for plant access to these nutrients, and that soil microorganisms are a major source of these enzymes. We predict that plant nutrient partitioning arises from differential associations of plant species with microbes able to access different nutrient pools. Feedback dynamics result from changes in the soil community generated by the specificity of response in plant–microbe interactions. We suggest that positive feedback between plants and soil microbes plays a central role in early successional communities, while negative feedback contributes both to species replacements and to diversification in later successional communities. We further suggest that plant–microbe interactions in the soil are an important organizing force for large‐scale spatial gradients in species richness. The relative balance of positive feedback (a homogenizing force) and negative feedback (a diversifying force) may contribute to observed latitudinal (and altitudinal) diversity patterns. Empirical tests of these ideas are needed, but a microbially based perspective for plant ecology promises to contribute to our understanding of long‐standing issues in ecology, and to reveal new areas of future research.
ecology
-
The global soil community and its influence on biogeochemistry
T. W. Crowther,J. van den Hoogen,J. Wan,M. A. Mayes,A. D. Keiser,L. Mo,C. Averill,D. S. Maynard
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aav0550
IF: 56.9
2019-08-23
Science
Abstract:Microbes' role in soil decomposition Soils harbor a rich diversity of invertebrate and microbial life, which drives biogeochemical processes from local to global scales. Relating the biodiversity patterns of soil ecological communities to soil biogeochemistry remains an important challenge for ecologists and earth system modelers. Crowther et al. review the state of science relating soil organisms to biogeochemical processes, focusing particularly on the importance of microbial community variation on decomposition and turnover of soil organic matter. Although there is variation in soil communities across the globe, ecologists are beginning to identify general patterns that may contribute to predicting biogeochemical dynamics under future climate change. Science , this issue p. eaav0550
multidisciplinary sciences
-
The Deep Soil Organic Carbon Response to Global Change
Caitlin Hicks Pries,Rebecca Ryals,Biao Zhu,Kyungjin Min,Alexia Cooper,Sarah Goldsmith,Jennifer Pett-Ridge,Margaret Torn,Asmeret Asefaw Berhe
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-ecolsys-102320-085332
2023-08-22
Abstract:Over 70% of soil organic carbon (SOC) is stored at a depth greater than 20 cm belowground. A portion of this deep SOC actively cycles on annual to decadal timescales and is sensitive to global change. However, deep SOC responses to global change likely differ from surface SOC responses because biotic controls on SOC cycling become weaker as mineral controls predominate with depth. Here, we synthesize the current information on deep SOC responses to the global change drivers of warming, shifting precipitation, elevated CO 2 , and land use and land cover change. Most deep SOC responses can only be hypothesized because few global change studies measure deep soils, and even fewer global change experiments manipulate deep soils. We call on scientists to incorporate deep soils into their manipulations, measurements, and models so that the response of deep SOC can be accounted for in projections of nature-based climate solutions and terrestrial feedbacks to climate change. Expected final online publication date for the Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics, Volume 54 is November 2023. Please see http://www.annualreviews.org/page/journal/pubdates for revised estimates.
ecology,evolutionary biology