A review on removal of mercury from flue gas utilizing existing air pollutant control devices (APCDs)

Ying Li,Jianglong Yu,Yangxian Liu,Renkun Huang,Zhihua Wang,Yongchun Zhao
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2021.128132
IF: 13.6
2022-04-01
Journal of Hazardous Materials
Abstract:Mercury is a highly toxic heavy metal pollutant. It is of great significance to develop cost-effective mercury pollution control technologies of coal-fired flue gas. Among various mercury from flue gas removal methods, the application of existing air pollution control devices (APCDs) to remove mercury from flue gas is one of the most valuable methods because it doesn't need to install additional mercury removal equipment, reducing the cost of mercury removal. This review summarizes the recent progress of mercury from flue gas removal by APCDs (e.g., SCR denitration device, WFGD system and dust removal device). SCR denitration device can achieve partial removal of mercury in flue gas through combined with WFGD system, but easy inactivation and poor sulfur/water/heavy metals resistance of SCR catalyzers are still the main problems. WFGD systems can remove most of Hg<sup>2+</sup> (80%-95%), but have low treatment ability for Hg<sup>0</sup>. Various oxidants can effectively oxidize Hg<sup>0</sup> into Hg<sup>2+</sup>. However, traditional oxidants have high prices and secondary pollution due to the formation of by-products. Fabric filters (FFs), electrostatic precipitators (ESPs) and hybrid fabric filters (HFs) can all control the emission of mercury in the flue gas to a certain extent, especially can effectively remove most of Hg<sup>P</sup> and part of Hg<sup>2+</sup>, but has low removal capacity for Hg<sup>0</sup>. Compared with ESP, FF has better capture efficiency for Hg<sup>2+</sup> and Hg<sup>0</sup>, and a combination of ESP and FF, that is HF, can effectively improve the mercury removal capacity.
environmental sciences,engineering, environmental
What problem does this paper attempt to address?