Cost-Effectiveness and Health Impacts of Different Influenza Vaccination Strategies for Children in China
Yilin Gong,Xuelin Yao,Jin Peng,Yue Ma,Yu Fang,Kangkang Yan,Minghuan Jiang
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2023.01.028
IF: 6.604
2023-04-10
American Journal of Preventive Medicine
Abstract:Introduction We aimed to evaluate the economic and health impacts of 3 influenza vaccines available in China, including trivalent inactivated vaccine, quadrivalent inactivated vaccine, and live attenuated influenza vaccine, for children aged 6 months to 18 years. Methods Two decision-analytic models were developed to simulate 4 vaccination strategies. Outcomes included total costs from a societal perspective in 2021, quality-adjusted life-year loss, numbers of outpatient and inpatient cases, and deaths avoided using each strategy. Deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were performed to examine the uncertainty of model inputs. Results For children aged 6 months to 3 years, trivalent inactivated vaccine saved 32,948.5/quality-adjusted life-year (willingness-to-pay threshold= 1.28 billion more costly but gained an additional 13,560 quality-adjusted life-years; its incremental cost-effectiveness ratio was $123,983.8/quality-adjusted life-year. Live attenuated influenza vaccine would be cost-effective if its vaccine effectiveness was >0.79. Probabilistic sensitivity analysis revealed that quadrivalent inactivated vaccine, trivalent inactivated vaccine, live attenuated influenza vaccine, and no vaccination were cost-effective in 55.94%, 33.09%, 10.97%, and 0% of 10,000 Monte Carlo simulations. Conclusions Trivalent inactivated vaccine was cost-effective compared with no vaccination in children aged 6 months to 18 years. Of the 3 vaccination strategies for children aged 3–18 months, quadrivalent inactivated vaccine appears to be the most cost-effective.
medicine, general & internal,public, environmental & occupational health