Abstract:Objective: Type B aortic dissection (TBAD) complicated by malperfusion carries high morbidity and mortality. The present study was undertaken to compare the characteristics of malperfusion and uncomplicated cohorts and to evaluate the long-term differences in survival using a granular, national registry. Methods: Patients with TBAD entered into the thoracic endovascular aortic repair/complex endovascular aortic repair module of the Vascular Quality Initiative from 2010 to 2019 were included. The demographic, radiographic, operative, postoperative, in-hospital, and long-term reintervention data were compared between the malperfusion and uncomplicated TBAD groups using t tests and χ2 analysis, as appropriate. Overall survival was compared using Cox regression to generate survival curves. Results: Of the 2820 included patients, 2267 had uncomplicated TBAD and 553 had malperfusion. The patients with malperfusion were younger (age, 55.8 vs 61.2 years; P < .001), were more often male (79.7% vs 68.1%; P < .001), had a higher preoperative creatinine (1.8 vs 1.1 mg/dL; P < .001), had more often presented with an American Society of Anesthesiologists class of 4 or 5 (81.9% vs 58.4%; P < .001), and had more often presented with urgent status (77.4% vs 32.8%; P < .001). In contrast, the uncomplicated TBAD group had had more medical comorbidities, including coronary artery disease and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and a larger aortic diameter (4.0 cm vs 4.9 cm; P < .001). The malperfusion group more frequently had proximal zones of disease in zones 0 to 2 (38.6% vs 31.5%; P = .002) and distal zones of disease in zones 9 and above (78.7% vs 46.2%; P < .001), with a greater number of aortic zones traversed (7.7 vs 5.1; P < .001) and a greater frequency of dissection extension into branch vessels (61.8% vs 23.1%; P < .001). Patients with malperfusion also exhibited greater case complexity, with a greater need for branch vessel stenting and longer procedure times. The overall incidence of postoperative complications was greater in the malperfusion group (39.4% vs 17.1%; P < .001) and included a greater rate of spinal cord ischemia (6.3% vs 2.2%; P < .001), acute kidney injury (10.4% vs 0.9%; P < .001), and in-hospital mortality (11.6% vs 5.6%; P < .001). In-hospital reintervention was also greater for the malperfusion patients (14.5% vs 7.4%; P < .001), although the incidence of long-term reinterventions was similar between the two groups (8.7% vs 9.7%; P = .548). A proximal zone of disease in zone 0 to 2 was associated with decreased survival. In contrast, a distal zone of disease in 9 and above, in-hospital reintervention, and long-term follow-up were associated with increased survival. Despite these differences, long-term survival did not differ between the malperfusion and uncomplicated groups (P = .320.) CONCLUSIONS: Patients presenting with TBAD and malperfusion represent a unique cohort. Despite the greater need for branch vessel stenting and in-hospital reintervention, they had similar long-term reintervention rates and survival compared with those with uncomplicated TBAD. These data lend insight with regard to the observed differences between uncomplicated and malperfusion TBAD.

Morphologic Characteristics and Endovascular Management of Acute Type B Dissection Patients with Superior Mesenteric Artery Involvement.

Endovascular treatment of isolated abdominal aortic dissection and postoperative aortic remodeling.

Long-Term Aortic Remodeling after Thoracic Endovascular Aortic Repair of Acute, Subacute, and Chronic Type B Dissections.

Endovascular Treatment of Spontaneous Isolated Dissection of the Superior Mesenteric Artery

[Surgical Strategies and Efficacy Analysis for Aortic Dissection Complicating Intractable Mesenteric Artery Ischemia].

Systematic Review of the Management of Acute Type A Aortic Dissection with Mesenteric Malperfusion

Thrombotic Mesenteric Ischemia Due to Aortic Dissection

Initial Study of the Extended STABILISE Technique for Complete Remodeling in Aortic Dissection

Comparison of Superior Mesenteric Artery Remodeling and Clinical Outcomes between Conservative or Endovascular Treatment in Spontaneous Isolated Superior Mesenteric Artery Dissection

Morphology of True Lumen and Surgical Outcomes of Acute Type A Aortic Dissection Repair with Superior Mesenteric Artery Malperfusion

Intravascular Ultrasound-Assisted Endovascular Treatment of Mesenteric Malperfusion in a Multichannel Aortic Dissection With Full True Lumen Collapse

Relationship Between Morphological Remodeling and Angiographic Types of Spontaneous Isolated Superior Mesenteric Artery Dissection After Conservative Management: Determinant Affecting Serial Radiologic Courses

Risk factors and treatment outcomes for type B aortic dissection with malperfusion requiring adjunctive procedures after thoracic endovascular aortic repair

The Number of Preoperative Abdominal False Lumen–perfused Small Branches is Related to Abdominal Aortic Remodeling after Thoracic Endovascular Aortic Repair for Type B Aortic Dissection

Unique characteristics of the type B aortic dissection patients with malperfusion in the Vascular Quality Initiative

Endovascular Treatment of Isolated Dissection of the Superior Mesenteric Artery

Immediate and Middle Term Outcome of Symptomatic Spontaneous Isolated Dissection of the Superior Mesenteric Artery

Incidence, Predictors, and Implications of Secondary Aortic Intervention Following Thoracic Endovascular Aortic Repair for Type B Dissection

A comparative study on the transbrachial and transfemoral approaches for the treatment of superior mesenteric artery lesions

Acute Type B Aortic Dissection: Insights From a Single-Center Retrospective Experience Over 12 Years

Comparison of Reperfusion- and Central Repair-First Strategies for Acute Type a Dissection with Mesenteric Malperfusion: a Single-Center Retrospective Cohort Study.