Abstract:Empirical legal studies can benefit from the research findings of cultural psychology to understand the fundamental principles of law. Research findings in cultural psychology have shown that Eastern Asian cultures and North American cultures differ significantly in value orientations, moral judgments and cognitive styles. East Asian values emphasize collectivism and North American values emphasize individualism. East Asians moral reasons are centered on the principles of duties and responsibilities whereas North American moral reasons are centered on the principles of autonomy and justice. East Asian cognitive styles tend to be more holistic, focusing on context, backgrounds and relations and the North American cognitive styles tend to be more analytic, focusing on objects, categories and dispositions. Such cultural differences have profound implications in legal understanding and legal practices, as laws are human machinery and are subject to the influence of human values, moralities and cognition. Mounting evidence in cross-cultural legal studies has shown East and West differences in causation inquiry, responsibility judgments, contract formation and mediation practices. Research indicates that East Asian causal reasoning is less likely to make the fundamental attribution error as North Americans do. East Asians’ responsibility judgments, compared with North Americans’, involve more contextual information (such as moral judgments) than the law actually warrants. East Asians’ contract formation may be more based on relational obligations than the North Americans’, which are rule based. The compensation judgments by East Asians appear to be based on the consequence whereas judgments made by North Americans seem to be based on intention judgments. East Asians also prefer mediation in conflict resolutions while North Americans prefer litigation in conflict resolutions. We argue that these differences could influence people’s understanding, construction and use of laws in fundamental ways. As the law attempts to further understand people, and as theorists continue to evaluate how human life and law influence each others, scholars in both psychology and law must challenge themselves to reflect on the law’s substantive and procedural standards being applied in different cultural groups.. We hope our paper can generate enough interests among Chinese psychologists and legal scholars to start the journey towards finding solutions that both considers cultural psychology’s empirical findings and effectuates our legal ideals. The cross-culture empirical legal studies hence not only provide a new paradigm for legal scholarship but also provide theoretical guidance for advancing Chinese legal studies in global stages as well as in resolving international legal disputes between people from China and other countries.

On the Ethic and Technology in the Construction of Individual Personality in Civil Law

The Formation, Development and Vicissitude of the Technology of Distinguishing the Person in Nature and the Person in Law:Concurrently on Capacity for Rights in the Civil Code of Germany

The Construction of Judicial Person' Double-layer Theory of Rights Capacity and Its Meaning in Corporation Law

Personality Rights in China’s New Civil Code: A Response to Increasing Awareness of Rights in an Era of Evolving Technology

Personality in Roman Law:Qualifications of Legal Subject or Rights Subject

Personality Right in Constitutional Law

The Theory of the Interactive Relationship Between the Fundamental Constitutional Rights and Civil Rights:From the Perspective of the Right of Personality

The Concept of “general Personality Right” Should Not Be Adopted in Our Future Civil Code

Identity and Personality in Private Law——From the Perspective of Modern Private Law

From Personality Interest to the Element of Personality——Definition to the Objects of the Personality Right Legal Relationship

On Equality of Personality and Differences of Status in Private Law

On the General Part of Civil Code and its Legislation Pattern

Studies on the Capacity for Civil Conduct of Natural Person——From the Perspective of Classification and Legal Effect of Civil Conduct

Constructing Legal Order in an Intelligent Society

The Institution of Legal Person and Constructing the System of the Part of Personal Right of the Civil Law

Chinese Legal Culture: From Tradition to Modernity

Construction of Status System in Private law

Tempo-spatial Construction in Human-Law-society Triangle from the Perspective of Cognitive Semiotics

A Historical Perspective on the Unification of Private Law and the Future of the Civil Code

New Technologies and the Impact on Personality Rights in Brazil

Challenge and Contribution of Cultural Psychology to Empirical Legal Studies