Abstract:Abstract Increasingly, the economy of industrialised countries moves away from being based on a multiplicity of independent innovators to one characterised by cross-licensing and the pooling of intellectual property (IP) rights. Competition law is accorded a more limited role. Refusals to license or restrictive licence terms are tolerated. This paradigm emphasises the innovation at the expense of the dissemination rationale of IP and competition law. The pressure on developing countries is to follow suit. However, this approach jeopardises overcoming the technology dependence of these states. Yet, the political consensus underlying the Agreement on Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights (TRIPS) was that, in exchange for IP rights protection, a transfer and dissemination of technology benefiting the global South would occur. This has not taken place so far. Taking this promise seriously requires according an enhanced, more social role to competition law. Articles 8(2), 31 and 40 of TRIPS – the TRIPS competition rules – could be interpreted in a way to accomplish this. This article argues in favour of a “prodevelopment” approach to IP-related competition law. This could be viewed as a demand of the rule of law at the international level. On the one hand, treaties such as TRIPS are to be interpreted in good faith. On the other, public interest and human rights considerations justify, as it were, require, such an approach. Articles 7 and 8 of TRIPS can play a crucial role in this regard. They reflect such public interest considerations as “object and purpose” of TRIPS. They also provide a link to international human rights law (IHRL). IHRL protects a (group) right to development, confirming “policy space” for World Trade Organization (WTO) members and the freedom to opt for a competition law model that facilitates dissemination. The International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights (ICESCR) further protects various economic, social and cultural rights, including the right to enjoy the benefits of scientific progress and its applications (REBSPA). These rights may be said to give rise to “transfer and dissemination of technology” as a human right. Duties under the right to development and “territorial” and “extraterritorial” human rights obligations (ETOs) under the ICESCR support an understanding of competition law which is pro development, which takes account of local access and welfare needs. The article concludes with a set of 10 consolidated considerations for a “prodevelopment” IP-related competition law.

Intellectual Right v. Human Right: The International Protection of Intellectual Property in the Post-TRIPs Ages

Unveiling Human Rights Protection in China from the Perspective of Criminal Procedure Law

Civil Right Socialization for the Legislation Value Tropism of Intellectual Property

TRIPS and Developing Countries

The International Protection of Intellectual Property Rights and the Challenges China is Confronted With

From TRIPS to FTAs and Back: Re-Conceptualising the Role of a Multilateral IP Framework in a TRIPS-Plus World

The Analysis of the Legal Construction of the Right on Genetic Resources

Intellectual Property Tools in Safeguarding Intangible Cultural Heritage: A Chinese Perspective

Reductionist Intellectual Property Protection and Expansionist (and “Prodevelopment”) Competition Rules as a Human Rights Imperative? Enhancing Technology Transfer to the Global South

Integrating China's Intellectual Property Policies and Development Strategies

Torts and intellectual property in Industry 4.0: a comparative study of Chinese and American jurisprudence

The Limits to Law: How Intellectual Properties Are Used and Protected in Chinese Industries

Key Issues and Benchmark of China's Intellectual Property Rights Protection under TRIPS Agreement

Economic and Legal Aspects of Intellectual Property Protection Abroad

Information,Intellectual Property and China's Strategy of Intellectual Property

Current Situation and Future Development of Intellectual Property Protection in China

Intellectual Property Law in the Digital Economy Era: New Challenges and Countermeasures

The research on the legal protection of High Technology intellectual property

Discussion on the intellectual property risk and management of international cooperative scientific research from the perspective of human genetic resources protection

International Developments against Intellectual Monopoly and Its Implications for China

Intellectual property rights (IPR): An overview