Abstract:Culture is a human universal, yet it is a source of variation in human psychology, behaviour and development. Developmental researchers are now expanding the geographical scope of research to include populations beyond relatively wealthy Western communities. However, culture and context still play a secondary role in the theoretical grounding of developmental psychology research, far too often. In this paper, we highlight four false assumptions that are common in psychology, and that detract from the quality of both standard and cross-cultural research in development. These assumptions are: (i) the universality assumption , that empirical uniformity is evidence for universality, while any variation is evidence for culturally derived variation; (ii) the Western centrality assumption , that Western populations represent a normal and/or healthy standard against which development in all societies can be compared; (iii) the deficit assumption , that population-level differences in developmental timing or outcomes are necessarily due to something lacking among non-Western populations; and (iv) the equivalency assumption , that using identical research methods will necessarily produce equivalent and externally valid data, across disparate cultural contexts. For each assumption, we draw on cultural evolutionary theory to critique and replace the assumption with a theoretically grounded approach to culture in development. We support these suggestions with positive examples drawn from research in development. Finally, we conclude with a call for researchers to take reasonable steps towards more fully incorporating culture and context into studies of development, by expanding their participant pools in strategic ways. This will lead to a more inclusive and therefore more accurate description of human development. This article is part of the theme issue ‘Bridging cultural gaps: interdisciplinary studies in human cultural evolution’.

A joint future for cultural evolution and developmental psychology

Two Cognitive Transitions Underlying the Capacity for Cultural Evolution

Variation is the universal: making cultural evolution work in developmental psychology

Parallels and promising directions in the study of genetic, cultural, and moral evolution

Distilling the Essence of an Evolutionary Process and Implications for a Formal Description of Culture

Cultural evolutionary theory: How culture evolves and why it matters

A Computational Model of Two Cognitive Transitions Underlying Cultural Evolution

A cultural evolutionary theory that explains both gradual and punctuated change

Cultural Evolution Entails (Creativity Entails (Concept Combination Entails Quantum Structure))

Multilevel cultural evolution: From new theory to practical applications

Exploring the Psychological Basis for Transitions in the Archaeological Record

Cultural commons and cultural evolution

Group Coordination Catalyzes Individual and Cultural Intelligence

The Cultural Evolution of Socially Situated Cognition

The Cultural Evolution of Teaching

Culture and Evolvability: a Brief Archaeological Perspective

Mutual benefits of social learning and algorithmic mediation for cumulative culture

Shared intentions and the advance of cumulative culture in hunter-gatherers

An Agent-based Model of the Cognitive Mechanisms Underlying the Origins of Creative Cultural Evolution

The origins of human cumulative culture: from the foraging niche to collective intelligence

Cultural Evolution as Distributed Computation