T1rho Shortening Effect of Fat in Liver Steatosis after Fat Suppression: Approximate Estimation in a Methionine and Choline-Deficient (MCD) Diet Rat Model.

Feng Zhao,Nan Zhou,Xiaoqi Wang,Ji-Li Wang,Wei-Xiang Zhong,Min Deng,Cun-Jing Zheng,Jian He,Sen-Xiang Yan,Yì Xiáng J Wáng

DOI: https://doi.org/10.21037/qims-20-1253

2021-01-01

Quantitative Imaging in Medicine and Surgery

Abstract:Quant Imaging Med Surg 2021;11(2):870-875 | http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/qims-20-1253 In our recent study using a rat model of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) induced with methionine and choline-deficient (MCD) diet, we demonstrated that collagen deposition in the liver strongly contribute to liver T1rho elongation, while fat deposition contributes to T1rho shortening (1,2). However, there were two questions remain unanswered. The first is that how the fat content’s contribution to T1rho shortening can be quantified. Secondly, since we estimated that 1% collagen area increase contributed to T1rho value increase of 1.35 ms, and this observation might have been damped by that fat deposition always co-existed with collagen deposition in this animal model, thus it remains undetermined that 1% collagen increase contributes to how much T1rho value elongation in the absence of liver steatosis. Hereby we try to address these two questions. Using last study’s data of each experimental rat’s collagen content (in percentage area measured with histology), MRI measured fat content (in percentage), and T1rho (in ms, millisecond), we ranked the results according to the collagen content and selected the 15 pairs where the collagen content difference within each pair was ≤0.03%. Since liver collagen content of experimental rats measured from 0.34– 6.46% (mean ± SD: 2.58%±1.54%), the within pair collagen content difference of these rats could be considered to be ‘zero’ (1). We took the assumption that, in our MCD model, inflammation’s contribution to T1rho per se was minimal, and was instead mediated via collagen deposition. Thus, leaving aside the issue of measurement imprecision, we can hypothesize that difference between each pair’s liver T1rho value was primarily due to the difference in liver fat content. Note we confirmed that liver fat content measured by MRI was almost the same as measured by histology (1). Figure 1A shows, when disregarding the amount of fat content difference, higher liver fat content is seen with longer liver T1rho value in 5 pairs while with shorter T1rho value in 10 pairs. The mean difference among the 15 pairs was −1.028 (95% confidence interval: −1.9499, −0.1061, P=0.031). The mean difference value of 10 pairs with T1rho shortening was three times of that of the 5 pairs with T1rho elongation (−1.874 vs. 0.664 ms). A mean of 8.72% higher fat content was associated with a mean of 1.03 ms T1rho shortening (data from Figure 1A). A linear regression suggests 10% fat increase contributed to 1.55 ms T1rho shortening (Figure 1B, Pearson r=−0.40). We hypothesize that higher Letter to the Editor