Abstract:Objective: To investigate the effect of pelvic peritoneum reconstruction on the prognosis of patients underwent laparoscopic low anterior resection of rectal adenocarcinoma. Methods: This retrospective cohort study included 97 patients who underwent laparoscopic low anterior resection of rectal adenocarcinoma in General Surgery Department, the First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University from January 2017 to June 2021. According to the implementation of pelvic peritoneum reconstruction, the subjects were divided into study group (48 patients underwent pelvic peritoneum reconstruction after laparoscopic resection) and control group (49 patients not underwent pelvic peritoneum reconstruction). The two groups were compared in terms of Wexner score of anal function, anorectal manometry results, normal rate of defecation sensation, pelvic floor anatomical structure and postoperative complications. Five-year survival analysis was performed. Results: Patients in the study group and the control group were (61.25±10.38) years old and (59.47±11.40) years old (P>0.05). The proportions of male patients were 60.4% (29 cases) and 55.1% (27 cases) (P>0.05) in the study group and control group, respectively. At 3, 6 and 12 months after surgery, Wexner scores of anal function in the study group were lower than those in the control group [(14.29±2.07) vs (16.33±2.18), P<0.001; (9.57±2.34) vs (11.26±2.85), P=0.002; (5.41±1.36) vs (7.86±1.95), P<0.001, respectively]. The anal resting pressure and anal systolic pressure of the study group were higher than those of the control group [(56.29±7.31) mmHg vs (52.88±6.65) mmHg, P=0.018; (129.33±17.36) mmHg vs (110.45±15.22) mmHg, P<0.001, respectively] (1 mmHg=0.133 kPa). The rectal sensory volume, rectal maximum tolerance volume, and the length of anal high-pressure area in the study group were greater than those in the control group [(32.15±4.38) vs (29.76±4.29), P=0.008; (209.57±40.27) vs (184.39±37.56), P=0.002; (3.07±0.52) vs (2.80±0.49), P=0.010, respectively]. At 3 and 6 months after surgery, the normal rates of defecation sensation in the study group were 47.9% (23 cases) and 70.8% (34 cases), respectively, higher than those in the control group [26.5% (13 cases) and 51.0% (25 cases)] (P=0.029 and 0.046, respectively). The detection rate of intestinal tube accumulation in the study group was lower than that in the control group [12.5% (6 cases) vs 38.9% (19 cases)] (P=0.003). There was no significant difference in the total incidence of complications (anastomotic leakage, abdominal infection, intestinal obstruction, pendant pneumonia and urinary tract infection) between the two groups [18.8% (9 cases) vs 24.5% (12 cases)] (P=0.493). There was no significant difference in 5-year cumulative survival rate between the study group and the control group (71.6% vs 68.2%, P=0.309). Conclusion: Pelvic peritoneum reconstruction can improve postoperative anal function and reduce intestinal tube accumulation in patients underwent laparoscopic low anterior resection of rectal adenocarcinoma with high safety and feasibility.

Perineal Wound Complication Risk Factors and Effects on Survival after Abdominoperineal Resection of Rectal Cancer: a Single-Centre Retrospective Study

Risk factors for the perineal incision complications after abdominoperineal excision for rectal cancer

[Effect of pelvic peritoneum reconstruction on the prognosis of patients underwent laparoscopic low anterior resection of rectal adenocarcinoma]

[Comparative study of clinical efficacy between abdominoperineal resection and anterior resection procedure in patients with rectal cancer].

Abdominoperineal Excision Following Preoperative Radiotherapy for Rectal Cancer: Unfavorable Prognosis Even with Negative Circumferential Resection Margin.

Risk Factors of Symptomatic Anastomotic Leakage and Its Impacts on a Long-Term Survival after Laparoscopic Low Anterior Resection for Rectal Cancer: a Retrospective Single-Center Study.

Multivariance Analysis of Risk Factors for Anastomotic Leakage after Anterior Peritoneal Resection of Rectal Carcinoma

Clinical Evaluation of Laparoscopic Abdominoperineal Resection for Cancer of the Low Rectum

Comparison of outcomes of abdominoperineal resection vs low anterior resection in very-low rectal cancer

Laparoscopic Vs Open Abdominoperineal Resection in the Multimodality Management of Low Rectal Cancers.

State-of-the-art clinical management of perineal wounds after abdominoperineal resection for rectal cancer

Outcomes based on risk assessment of anastomotic leakage after rectal cancer surgery.

Excluding the ischiorectal fossa irradiation during neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy with intensity-modulated radiotherapy followed by abdominoperineal resection decreases perineal complications in patients with lower rectal cancer

Impact of incisional negative pressure wound therapy on perineal wound healing after abdominoperineal rectum extirpation

Oncological superiority of extralevator abdominoperineal resection over conventional abdominoperineal resection: a meta-analysis

[Technical Improvements and Results of Individual Cylindrical Abdominoperineal Resection for Locally Advanced Low Rectal Cancer].

Lone-Star retractor perineal exposure method for laparoscopic abdominal perineal resection of rectal cancer

Analysis of risk factors for the sigmoid stoma complications in patients after abdominoperineal resection surgery: An observational study

Comprehensive assessment of risk factors and pathogenic characteristics of wound infections following thoracoscopic radical resection for lung cancer

Risk factors for severe low anterior resection syndrome in patients with rectal cancer undergoing sphincter‑preserving resection: A systematic review and meta‑analysis

Primary closure versus vertical rectus abdominis myocutaneous (VRAM) flap closure of perineal wound following abdominoperineal resection—a systematic review and meta-analysis