Antiperistaltic Effect and Safety of L‐menthol Oral Solution on Gastric Mucosa for Upper Gastrointestinal Endoscopy in Chinese Patients: Phase III, Multicenter, Randomized, Double‐blind, Placebo‐controlled Study

Fandong Meng,Wenyan Li,Fachao Zhi,Zhaoshen Li,Zhanxiong Xue,Shuixiang He,Weifeng Chen,Yingxuan Chen,Xiangbin Xing,Chen Yao,Yongdong Wu,Shutian Zhang
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/den.13941
2021-01-01
Digestive Endoscopy
Abstract:Objective The topical antispasmodic agent l-menthol is commonly used for gastric peristalsis suppression during diagnostic upper gastrointestinal (GI) endoscopy. We evaluated the efficacy and safety of a single dose l-menthol solution in suppressing gastric peristalsis during upper GI endoscopy in Chinese patients. Methods In this phase III, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT03263910), 220 patients scheduled to undergo upper GI endoscopy at five Chinese referral centers received a single dose of either 160 mg of l-menthol (n = 109) or placebo (n = 111). Both treatments were sprayed endoscopically on the gastric mucosa. An independent committee evaluated the degree of gastric peristalsis (peristaltic score: grade 1-5). Results At baseline, the proportion of patients with grade 1 peristalsis (no peristalsis) did not differ between the groups. The proportion of patients with grade 1 peristalsis post-treatment was significantly higher in the l-menthol group (40.37%, 44/109) versus the placebo group (16.22%, 18/111; P < 0.001); the difference between the groups was 24.15% (95% confidence interval: 12.67%-35.63%; P < 0.001). In the l-menthol group, 61.47% of patients had grade 1 peristalsis after endoscopy versus 24.55% in the placebo group (P < 0.001). The ease of intragastric examination correlated significantly with the grade of peristalsis. The incidence of adverse events was comparable between the groups (P = 0.340). Conclusions During upper GI endoscopy, a single dose of l-menthol solution (160 mg) sprayed on the gastric mucosa significantly attenuated gastric peristalsis versus placebo, thereby improving the visual stability without any safety concerns.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?