Abstract:A number of real-world problems involve optimization of multiple conflicting criteria assessed using expensive evaluations. In practice, such expensive multi/many-objective optimization problems (EMOPs) need to be solved using small number of design evaluations. Surrogate-assisted evolutionary algorithms (SAEAs) are commonly used to solve EMOPs and broadly follow either a generational or a steady-state form, both having their characteristic advantages. The generational forms involve evaluation of multiple solutions in each generation, and are more suitable for scenarios where the parallelization of the evaluations is possible. The steady-state forms evaluate one solution at a time, therefore incorporating the additional information more frequently, but are more suited to non-parallelizable scenarios. Although it is possible to run the generational algorithms in a steady-state manner through certain parameter settings, we show in this study that such settings have a negative impact on their search performance. This leads to an inference that existing methods are not able to seamlessly switch between generational and steady-state forms based on the application at hand. In this study, we address this gap by extending a recently proposed steady-state framework (SASSEA) to a generalized form (GSAEA) which can be run in both steady-state or generational form by simply prescribing the number of true evaluations per generation. Numerical experiments are conducted using low evaluation budgets on a range of MOPs with up to 7 objectives and diverse types of Pareto-optimal fronts. The results indicate that the proposed framework shows competitive or better performance relative to the state-of-the-art methods, both in generational and steady-state setting.

A review of surrogate-assisted evolutionary algorithms for expensive optimization problems

Surrogate-assisted Evolutionary Algorithms for Expensive Combinatorial Optimization: a Survey

A composite surrogate-assisted evolutionary algorithm for expensive many-objective optimization

Un-evaluated Solutions May Be Valuable in Expensive Optimization

A Multiple Surrogate Assisted Decomposition-Based Evolutionary Algorithm for Expensive Multi/Many-Objective Optimization

Surrogate-Assisted Evolutionary Algorithms with Adaptive Constraint Evaluation

Surrogate Assisted Evolutionary Algorithm for Medium Scale Expensive Multi-Objective Optimisation Problems

Expensive Optimization Via Surrogate-Assisted and Model-Free Evolutionary Optimization.

Voronoi-based Efficient Surrogate-assisted Evolutionary Algorithm for Very Expensive Problems

A bagging-based surrogate-assisted evolutionary algorithm for expensive multi-objective optimization

A General Framework of Surrogate-Assisted Evolutionary Algorithms for Solving Computationally Expensive Constrained Optimization Problems

A Surrogate-Assisted Clustering-Based Evolutionary Algorithm for Expensive Optimization.

A Novel Evolutionary Sampling Assisted Optimization Method for High-Dimensional Expensive Problems

Enhancing SAEAs with Unevaluated Solutions: A Case Study of Relation Model for Expensive Optimization

A Surrogate-Assisted Evolutionary Algorithm for Expensive Dynamic Multimodal Optimzation

Experience-Based Evolutionary Algorithms for Expensive Optimization

A Hierarchical Surrogate Assisted Optimization Algorithm Using Teaching-Learning-based Optimization and Differential Evolution for High-Dimensional Expensive Problems

Surrogate Models in Evolutionary Single-Objective Optimization: A New Taxonomy and Experimental Study

Accelerating Surrogate Assisted Evolutionary Algorithms for Expensive Multi-Objective Optimization Via Explainable Machine Learning

A Hybrid Surrogate-Assisted Evolutionary Algorithm for Computationally Expensive Many-Objective Optimization.

An Ensemble Surrogate-based Framework for Expensive Multiobjective Evolutionary Optimization