Abstract:C ONFIGURATIONS with a highly flexible delta wing are considered for the next generation of unmanned air vehicles (UAV). Delta wing flowfield is dominated by vortical structures at high angle of attack, the most prominent is called leading-edge vortex. Ye and Zhao [1] used a nonlinear lifting line method to compute the aerodynamic loads of the delta wing at high angle of attack. With the development of computer technology, computational fluid dynamics (CFD) technique has been used in the simulation of delta wing-induced vortical flow. The study [2] shows that the Reynolds number affects primary vortex slightly, and so Euler codes can be employed to simulate the vortex and aerodynamic loads; the shortness is that it cannot simulate the secondary vortex caused by the effect of viscosity. The CFD and computational structural dynamics (CSD) direct coupling method has been used in aeroelastic analysis of deltawing.Gordnier et al. [3,4] coupled Euler/ Navier–Stokes codes and nonlinear plant element to study the buffet problem of the flexible delta wing at high angle of attack. The CFD and CSD direct coupling method [5–7] has also been used in the nonlinear flutter simulation of delta wing at small angle of attack (<5 deg). The limitation of the direct aeroelastic simulation method is the high cost of the computational time. To solve the contradiction between computational efficiency and computational quality, many researchers turn to CFD-based unsteady aerodynamic reduced-order modeling (ROM) to improve the aeroelastic computational efficiency in the last decade. Dowell and Hall [8], Lucia et al. [9], and Zhang and Ye [10] present some overviews of ROM and its applications on nonlinear aeroelastic research. There are two kinds of methods for ROMof unsteady aerodynamic loads at the present time. The one is the proper orthogonal decomposition (POD) based reduced-order modeling method, the other is aerodynamic modeling based on structural modes by using identification technology. The second method is used in this work. Zhang [11] compared the efficiency between the ROM-based method and the CFD direct simulation method. Efficiency can be improved by 1 2 orders with accuracy still retained by ROM-based method. Zhang used CFDbased ROM to perform aeroservoelastic analysis [12] and transonic flutter suppression by active control [13].

Efficient Prediction of Transonic Flutter Boundaries for Varying Mach Number and Angle of Attack Via LSTM Network

Deep Neural Network for Unsteady Aerodynamic and Aeroelastic Modeling Across Multiple Mach Numbers

Stall Flutter Prediction Based on Multi-Layer GRU Neural Network

Unsteady aerodynamic reduced-order modeling based on machine learning across multiple airfoils

Unsteady and nonlinear aerodynamic prediction of airfoil undergoing large-amplitude pitching oscillation based on gated recurrent unit network

Nonlinear Aeroelastic Prediction in Transonic Buffeting Flow by Deep Neural Network

Efficient Nonlinear Reduced-Order Model for Computational Fluid Dynamics-Based Aeroelastic Analysis

An Accuracy-Enhanced Transonic Flow Prediction Method Fusing Deep Learning and a Reduced-Order Model

A Novel Long Short-Term Memory Neural-Network-based Self-Excited Force Model of Limit Cycle Oscillations of Nonlinear Flutter for Various Aerodynamic Configurations

Efficient multi-fidelity reduced-order modeling for nonlinear flutter prediction

High Efficient Numerical Method for Limit Cycle Flutter Analysis Based on Nonlinear Aerodynamic Reduced Order Model Reduced Order Model

Nonlinear Unsteady Aerodynamic Forces Prediction and Aeroelastic Analysis of Wind-Induced Bridge Response at Multiple Wind Speeds: A Deep Learning-Based Reduced-Order Model

Reduced-Order-Model-Based Flutter Analysis at High Angle of Attack

Application of Deep Learning Models to Predict Panel Flutter in Aerospace Structures

Efficient Method For Limit Cycle Flutter Analysis By Nonlinear Aerodynamic Reduced-Order Models

Reduced order aerodynamics for delta wing pitching oscillations

Efficient reduced-order modeling of unsteady aerodynamics robust to flight parameter variations

Nonlinear Manifold Learning and Model Reduction for Transonic Flows

Steady-State Transonic Flowfield Prediction via Deep-Learning Framework

A robust data-driven model for flapping aerodynamics under different hovering kinematics

Transonic aeroelastic analysis basing on reduced order aerodynamic models