Abstract:Advance selling can lock in consumers and cannibalize discount-sensitive consumers from the regular selling stage, which has become a common strategy for manufacturer-led dual-channel supply chains. Consumers order or purchase goods in two stages including advance selling and regular selling, based on their offline and online market segmentations. This study employs a Stackelberg game approach to characterize centralized and decentralized models considering market segmentation and price discounts. We find that the manufacturer can obtain maximum equilibrium profit in advance selling by indirectly and purposefully guiding lock-in consumers in regular selling to purchase goods through the offline market, and subsequently can avoid minimum equilibrium profit in regular selling by directly and purposefully guiding lock-in consumers in regular selling to purchase goods through the offline market. However, the retailer can obtain the maximum equilibrium profits in both stages. Furthermore, for exogenous price discounts, the manufacturer and retailer formulate pricing strategies that adhere to existing market rules. For endogenous price discounts, pursuing a low price-discount strategy should be avoided. Cooperation between both players can always generate more profits under regular selling, but not under advance selling. A two-part tariff contract is proposed to achieve cooperation. The results show that by adjusting a lump-sum fee, players can smoothly implement the two-part tariff contract. Three extensions demonstrate that cannibalizing discount-sensitive consumers does not always result in higher profits for the manufacturer or retailer.

BARGAINING IN A MULTI-ECHELON SUPPLY CHAIN WITH POWER STRUCTURE: KS SOLUTION VS. NASH SOLUTION

Complexity of a Dynamic Hybrid Supply Chain Game Model with a Service Factor

Quality and Pricing Decisions in a Two-Echelon Supply Chain with Nash Bargaining Fairness Concerns

Pricing Decisions in a Dual Channels System with Different Power Structures

Effects of product substitutability and power relationships on performance in triadic supply chains

Research on Nash Equilibrium of Dual-Channel Supply Chain Based on Wholesale Price Discrimination and Sales Efforts

Low carbon joint strategy and coordination for a dyadic supply chain with Nash bargaining fairness

The Price of Fairness with the Extended Perles–Maschler Solution

A Comparison of a Simple Procurement Auction and Generalized Nash Bargaining

Cooperative advertising and coordination in a supply chain: the role of Nash bargaining fairness concerns

Research on Supply Chain Buyback Contracts Based on Bargaining Game

Optimal integration and bargaining decisions in asymmetric competing supply chains under virtual bargaining

Wholesale or drop-shipping: Contract choices of the online retailer and the manufacturer in a dual-channel supply chain

The effect of customer value and power structure on retail supply chain product choice and pricing decisions

Equilibrium Contract Selection Strategy in Chain-To-Chain Competition with Demand Uncertainty

Optimal pricing policies for differentiated brands under different supply chain power structures

Bargaining In A Push Supply Chain System Under Partial Cross Ownership

Decisions and Coordination of E-Commerce Supply Chain Considering Product Quality and Marketing Efforts under Different Power Structures

Advertising and power structures in competing supply chains

Game-theoretic analysis of a two-stage dual-channel supply chain coordination in the presence of market segmentation and price discounts

Studying the Complexity of Multichannel Supply Chain with Different Power Structures Under Carbon Subsidy Policy