Abstract:We propose a model-free omnibus statistical procedure to check whether the direction of changes in an economic variable is predictable using the history of its past changes. A class of separate inference procedures are also given to gauge possible sources of directional predictability. They can reveal information about whether the direction of future changes is predictable using the direction, level, volatility, skewness, and kurtosis of past changes. An important feature of the proposed procedures is that they check many lags simultaneously, which is particularly suitable for detecting the alternatives whose directional dependence is small at each lag but it carries over a long distributional lag. At the same time, the tests naturally discount higher order lags, which is consistent with the conventional wisdom that financial markets are more influenced by the recent past events than by the remote past events. We apply the proposed procedures to four daily U.S. stock price indices. We find overwhelming evidence that the directions of excess stock returns are predictable using past excess stock returns, and the evidence is stronger for the directional predictability of large excess stock returns. In particular, the direction and level of past excess stock returns can be used to predict the direction of future excess stock returns with any threshold, and the volatility, skewness and kurtosis of past excess stock returns can be used to predict the direction of future excess stock returns with nonzero thresholds (i.e., large returns). The well-known strong volatility clustering together with weak serial dependence in mean cannot completely explain all documented directional predictability for stock returns. To exploit the economic significance of the documented directional predictability for stock returns, we consider a class of autologit models for directional forecasts and find that they have significant out-of-sample directional predictive power. Some trading strategies based on these models and their combinations can earn significant out-of-sample extra risk-adjusted returns over the buy-and-hold trading strategy.

The Skewness of Oil Price Returns and Equity Premium Predictability

Oil price increases and the predictability of equity premium

Can the Skewness of Oil Returns Affect Stock Returns? Evidence from China’s A-Share Markets

Forecasting the Oil Prices: What is the Role of Skewness Risk?

Does realized skewness predict the cross-section of Chinese stock returns?

The World Predictive Power of US Equity Market Skewness Risk

Stock Return Predictability in China: Power of Oil Price Trend

Realized skewness and the short-term predictability for aggregate stock market volatility

Oil and the Short-Term Predictability of Stock Return Volatility

Market Skewness and Stock Return Predictability: New Evidence from China

It's Not That Important: the Negligible Effect of Oil Market Uncertainty

Can Investors Attention on Oil Markets Predict Stock Returns?

Stock market return predictability revisited: Evidence from a new index constructing the oil market

The Asymmetric Relationship Between Returns and Implied Higher Moments: Evidence from the Crude Oil Market

Intraday Momentum and Return Predictability: Evidence from the Crude Oil Market

Oil volatility risk and stock market volatility predictability: Evidence from G7 countries

Forecasting excess stock returns with crude oil market data

Can oil prices help predict US stock market returns? Evidence using a dynamic model averaging (DMA) approach

Are the Directions of Stock Price Changes Predictable ? Statistical Theory and Evidence

Forecasting equity returns with oil prices: addressing model choice uncertainty

Oil implied volatility and expected stock returns along the worldwide supply chain