Abstract:During the COVID-19 pandemic, while the world economy suffered the worst crisis since the Great Depression, the response of stock markets has raised concerns. Several economists (including some Nobel laureates) have seen these reactions as evidence that stock markets are not fully efficient, while others have emphasized the difficulty of assessing the dramatic flow of information about the pandemic and its economic consequences. In this paper, we assess how stock markets have integrated public information about the COVID-19, the subsequent lockdowns and the policy reactions. Although the COVID-19 shock has been global, not all countries have been impacted in the same way, and they have not reacted in the same way. We take advantage of this strong heterogeneity. We consider a panel of 74 countries with daily information about the health and economic crisis, from January to April 2020. Stock market reaction can be summarized as follows. 1) Stock markets initially ignored the pandemic (until Feb. 21), before reacted strongly to the growing number of infected people (Feb. 23 to Mar. 20), while volatility surged and concerns about the pandemic arose; following the intervention of central banks (Mar. 23 to Apr. 30), however, shareholders no longer seemed troubled by news of the health crisis, and prices rebound all around the world. 2) Country-specific characteristics appear to have had no influence on stock market response. 3) Investors were sensitive to the number of COVID-19 cases in neighbouring but mostly wealthy countries. 4) Credit facilities and government guarantees, lower policy interest rates, and lockdown measures mitigated the decline in domestic stock prices. Overall, these results suggest that stock markets have been less sensitive to each country’ macroeconomic fundamentals prior the crisis, than to their short-term reaction during the crisis. However, our selected variables explain only a small part of the stock market variations, so it is hard to deny that the link between stock price movements and fundamentals have been anything other than loose.

The Response of the Stock Market to the Announcement of Global Pandemic

Stock market reaction to the COVID-19 pandemic: an event study

How does China’s stock market react to the announcement of the COVID-19 pandemic lockdown?

COVID-19 pandemic and stock market reaction: empirical insights from 15 Asian countries

Surface characterization of Ti and Y-TZP following non-thermal plasma exposure.

Pandemic or panic? A firm-level study on the psychological and industrial impacts of COVID-19 on the Chinese stock market

Analysing the impacts of unscheduled news events on stock market contagion during the epidemic

COVID-19: stock market reactions to the shock and the stimulus

Information-based or resource-based systems may mediate Cycas-herbivore interactions

Government Fighting Pandemic, Stock Market Return, and COVID-19 Virus Outbreak

Coronavirus and the Chinese Stock Market: Pandemic Versus Financial Crisis

COVID-19 and financial market response in China: Micro evidence and possible mechanisms

The Stock Market Is not the Economy? Insights from the COVID-19 Crisis

The Impact of the Coronavirus Disease 2019 Pandemic on Investor Sentiment-Evidence From A-Share Listed Companies in China

Immune or at-risk? Stock markets and the significance of the COVID-19 pandemic

COVID-19, various government interventions and stock market performance

COVID-19 Sentiment and the Chinese Stock Market: Evidence from the Official News Media and Sina Weibo

COVID–19’s Impact on Stock Prices Across Different Sectors—An Event Study Based on the Chinese Stock Market

The Impact of the COVID-19 on Economic Sustainability—A Case Study of Fluctuation in Stock Prices for China and South Korea

Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on China's Stock Market Volatility, During and After the Outbreak: Evidence From an ARDL Approach

International stock market risk contagion during the COVID-19 pandemic