A comparative study of the two weather processes with cold and snowing in southern China in 2008 and 2016

HU Yuling,ZHAO Zhongjun,KANG Caiyan,KANG Yanzhen,WANG Shigong,SHANG Kezheng
DOI: https://doi.org/10.7522/j.issn.1000-0240.2017.0131
2017-01-01
Abstract:In this paper, a comparative study of two weather processes with cold and snowing in southern China occurred over the period from 10th January to 2nd February, 2008 and from 20th January to 25th January, 2016 was performed by using 2. 5° × 2. 5° NCEP/NCAR monthly average data, 1° × 1° FNL reanalysis data and Janu-ary West Pacific subtropical ridge line and western ridge point circulation indexes from 1951 through 2016 from the National Climate Center, from the truth (precipitation, temperature and disasters), circulation conditions, energy, water vapor conditions and dynamic conditions. The following conclusions can be drawn:(1) The first event was featured as having precipitation of large areas, the process lasted long and caused heavy disaster; the second event was characterized as having precipitation of small areas, the process lasted short and caused light disaster. However, the intensity of cold air of the first event was much stronger than that of the second event. (2) The Asia-Europe circulation background of the first event was north ridge and south trough. However, in the second event the circulation pattern in low and middle latitudes was the same phase, featuring as a ridge from Siberia to Iran and a low vortex controlling China and Mongolia. (3) The temperature difference between 20 and 30 N in the middle and lower of troposphere in the second event was stronger than that in the first event. ( 4 ) The water vapor transport from south to north extended to 34° N and reached 300 hPa in the first event, but it extended to 28° N and reached 400 hPa in the second event. (5) In the first event, the water vapor at the heights of 5000 m, 3000 m and 1500 m came from the southwesterly path, but in the second event the water vapor at the same heights came from the northwesterly path. (6) The vertical movement of the whole layer was small in the first event but it was extended upward to 200 hPa; in contrast, it was strong in the second event but it was extended upward to 500 hPa.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?