Spatial and temporal patterns of evolution of global trade networks during 1985-2015 and its enlightenment to China's geostrategy

汪胜兰,蒋小荣,杨永春

DOI: https://doi.org/10.11821/dlyj201803004

2018-01-01

Abstract:The paper,from the perspective of social network,explores the spatial patterns and evolutionary characteristics of the global trade network and focuses on the Chinese community ownership and their strategic implications by adopting social network indexes,including centrality,community classification and structure entropy.The results show that:(1) The structure of global trade network evolved towards complexity,specifically shifted from "one super state and more powerful countries" towards"multi-polarization".The collective rise of developing countries has weakened the monopoly position of traditional European and American countries in the network,leading to increasing complexity of the network structure.(2) Community evolution of the global trade network has experienced the dominant stage of the developed countries,the budding stage of the Asian region,the separated stage of the Asian Community and the fourth stages of "ripartite confrontation".During the evolution,China has gradually moved from being dominated to the center of the stage.(3) The diversification of trade market is a common characteristic of foreign trade countries.In the process of global market segmentation,China,the United States,and Germany gradually formed a relationship of "dislocation competition",and their core interests are concentrated around the surrounding areas.(4) The areas of Asia-Pacific Region,Middle East,Africa and Latin America have become the play field of China to compete other powers for local trade markets.Currently,the Asia-Pacific market is the preferred market for China's global trade,and China should extend the market to the Middle East,Africa and Latin America through "Silk Road Economic Belt and 21st Century Maritime Silk Road",In this way,economic advantage can be transformed into global strategic influence.Meanwhile,direct conflicts and confrontations with the core interests of the United States should be avoided.