Analysis of Clinicopathologic Classification Features of Hydatidiform Mole Misdiagnosed As Missed Abortion Preoperatively

Yun-Hui Tang,Yi-Hua Sun,Jin Zhu,Xiao-Ying Yao
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4103/2096-2924.262393
2019-01-01
Reproductive and Developmental Medicine
Abstract:Objective: To analyze clinicopathologic classification features of the cases that were diagnosed as missed abortion preoperatively but turn out to be hydatidiform mole (HM) postoperatively. Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted on the patients who had a missed abortion in our hospital from 2017 to 2018. Clinical and pathological characteristics of different types of HMs were observed. Diagnostic value of karyotype in HM was discussed based on the karyotype analysis of villi chromosome. Results: A total of 278 (11.2%) HM patients were misdiagnosed as missed abortion. Naked-eye detection rate of HM was 26.61%, and sensitivity of transvaginal ultrasound on HM was 7.91%. One hundred and forty-seven (52.88%) HM cases could not be genotyped via pathological hematoxylin and eosin (HE) staining. 70 HM patients underwent P57 immunohistochemistry, which had guiding significance to the classification. In addition, the karyotype diagnosis of the tissues from 15 cases basically matched their P57 classifications. Conclusions: P57 should be listed as a routine test in hydatidiform pathological examination at the same time of HE staining, and what's more, P57 expression is consistent with genotyping, which should be recommended for the patients with HM if observed by naked eye.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?