Abstract:Due to the complexity of software systems, defects are inevitable. Understanding the types of defects could help developers to adopt measures in current and future software releases. In practice, developers often categorize defects into various types. One common categorization is based on fault triggers of defects. Fault trigger is a set of conditions which activate a defect (i.e., Fault) and propagate the defect into a failure. In general, there are two types of defect based fault triggering conditions, Bohrbug and Mandelbug. Bohrbug refers to a bug which can be easily isolated, and its activation and error propagation is simple. Mandelbug refers to a bug whose activation and/or error propagation is complex (e.g., A time lag between the fault activation and the failure occurrence). With these category labels, developers can better perform post-mortem analysis to identify common characteristic of the defects, and design specific fault-tolerance mechanisms. However, in most software systems, these category labels are often unavailable. To address this problem, in this paper, we propose a text mining solution which categorize defects into fault trigger categories by analyzing the natural-language description of bug reports. A previous study shows that Mandelbug is more complex and needs more time to be fixed. Thus, to better identify Mandelbugs, we propose a novel Fuzzy Set based Feature Selection algorithm named USES, which selects the features (i.e., Terms) which have high ability to distinguish Mandelbugs from Bohrbugs. USES first caches a set of terms based on their fuzzy affinity scores to Bohrbug or Mandelbug. Next, it iterates many times, and in each iteration, it selects a subset of terms, and builds a classifier on these terms. USES selects the classifier and the terms which could achieve the best performance on a training data. We evaluate our solution on 4 datasets including Linux, Mysql, Apache HTTPD, and AXIS containing a total of 809 bug reports. We show that USES with naive Bayes multinomial achieves the best performance, it achieves Mandelbug F-measure scores of 0.298 - 0.615. We also compare USES with other baseline approaches. The results show that USES on average improves Mandelbug F-measure scores of the best performing baseline by 12.3%.

Research on Defect Priority Classification of Crowdsourcing Testing for Mobile Applications

Classifying Crowdsourced Mobile Test Reports with Image Features: an Empirical Study

Redefining Crowdsourced Test Report Prioritization: An Innovative Approach with Large Language Model

Mobile crowdsourced test report prioritization based on text and image understanding

Optimizing Prioritization of Crowdsourced Test Reports of Web Applications through Image-to-Text Conversion

Collective Personalized Change Classification with Multiobjective Search

Prioritize Crowdsourced Test Reports via Deep Screenshot Understanding

Clustering Crowdsourced Test Reports of Mobile Applications Using Image Understanding

Automatic Defect Categorization Based on Fault Triggering Conditions

Test Report Prioritization To Assist Crowdsourced Testing

Multi-objective Test Report Prioritization Using Image Understanding

Crowdsourced Test Case Generation for Android Applications Via Static Program Analysis

Prioritization of Crowdsourced Testing Reports

Estimate the Precision of Defects Based on Reports Duplication in Crowdsourced Testing

A Systemic Framework for Crowdsourced Test Report Quality Assessment

Successes, Challenges, and Rethinking – an Industrial Investigation on Crowdsourced Mobile Application Testing

Mobile App Crowdsourced Test Report Consistency Detection via Deep Image-and-Text Fusion Understanding

Combined Classifier for Cross-Project Defect Prediction: an Extended Empirical Study.

Automated quality assessment for crowdsourced test reports of mobile applications

Fuzzy Clustering of Crowdsourced Test Reports for Apps.

STIFA: Crowdsourced Mobile Testing Report Selection Based on Text and Image Fusion Analysis