Abstract:The joint analysis of two datasets [Formula: see text] and [Formula: see text] that describe the same phenomena (e.g. the cellular state), but measure disjoint sets of variables (e.g. mRNA vs. protein levels) is currently challenging. Traditional methods typically analyze single interaction patterns such as variance or covariance. However, problem-tailored external knowledge may contain multiple different information about the interaction between the measured variables. We introduce MIASA, a holistic framework for the joint analysis of multiple different variables. It consists of assembling multiple different information such as similarity vs. association, expressed in terms of interaction-scores or distances, for subsequent clustering/classification. In addition, our framework includes a novel qualitative Euclidean embedding method (qEE-Transition) which enables using Euclidean-distance/vector-based clustering/classification methods on datasets that have a non-Euclidean-based interaction structure. As an alternative to conventional optimization-based multidimensional scaling methods which are prone to uncertainties, our qEE-Transition generates a new vector representation for each element of the dataset union [Formula: see text] in a common Euclidean space while strictly preserving the original ordering of the assembled interaction-distances. To demonstrate our work, we applied the framework to three types of simulated datasets: samples from families of distributions, samples from correlated random variables, and time-courses of statistical moments for three different types of stochastic two-gene interaction models. We then compared different clustering methods with vs. without the qEE-Transition. For all examples, we found that the qEE-Transition followed by Ward clustering had superior performance compared to non-agglomerative clustering methods but had a varied performance against ultrametric-based agglomerative methods. We also tested the qEE-Transition followed by supervised and unsupervised machine learning methods and found promising results, however, more work is needed for optimal parametrization of these methods. As a future perspective, our framework points to the importance of more developments and validation of distance-distribution models aiming to capture multiple-complex interactions between different variables.

Multivariate Independence Set Search via Progressive Addition for Conditional Markov Acyclic Networks

MPC: Multi-view Probabilistic Clustering

A Novel Approach to Fully Representing the Diversity in Conditional Dependencies for Learning Bayesian Network Classifier

Learning Bayesian Network Structures Using Weakest Mutual-Information-first Strategy

A Vine-Copula Based Adaptive Mcmc Sampler for Efficient Inference of Dynamical Systems

Analysis of Markov Boundary Induction in Bayesian Networks: A New View from Matroid Theory

Efficient Markov Network Structure Discovery Using Independence Tests

Highly Multivariate High-dimensionality Spatial Stochastic Processes-A Mixed Conditional Approach

Nonparametric Independence Screening in Sparse Ultra-High-Dimensional Additive Models

Learning non-parametric Markov networks with mutual information

Exploiting the Implicit Independence Assumption for Learning Directed Graphical Models.

Structure Learning of Bayesian Network Based on Adaptive Thresholding

Multidataset Independent Subspace Analysis with Application to Multimodal Fusion

Multivariate dependence and genetic networks inference

Mutual-information-inspired heuristics for constraint-based causal structure learning

Multi-Input data ASsembly for joint Analysis (MIASA): A framework for the joint analysis of disjoint sets of variables

Bayesian Nonparametric Modelling of Conditional Multidimensional Dependence Structures

Bayesian Structure Learning in Multi-layered Genomic Networks

Kernel-based joint independence tests for multivariate stationary and non-stationary time series

Inferring network structure in non-normal and mixed discrete-continuous genomic data

Testing Conditional Independence in Psychometric Networks: An Analysis of Three Bayesian Methods