Quantitative CT analysis of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis and correlation with lung function study
Hongmei Zhang,Xinyi Li,Xiaoyue Zhang,Yu Yuan,Chenglei Zhao,Jinling Zhang
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12890-024-03254-9
2024-09-05
Abstract:Background: Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis (IPF) is a progressive fibrotic lung disease. However, the field of quantitative CT scan analysis in conjunction with pulmonary function test for IPF patients remains relatively understudied. In this study, we evaluated the diagnostic value of features derived high-resolution computed tomography (HRCT) for patients with IPF and correlated them with pulmonary function tests. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed the chest HRCT images and pulmonary function test results of 52 patients with IPF during the same period (1 week) and selected 52 healthy individuals, matched for sex, age, and body mass index (BMI) and with normal chest HRCT as controls. HRCT scans were performed using a Philips 256-row Brilliance iCT scanner with standardized parameters. Lung function tests were performed using a Jaeger volumetric tracer for forced vital capacity (FVC), total lung capacity (TLC), forced expiratory volume in first second (FEV1), FEV1/FVC, carbon monoxide diffusing capacity (DLCO), and maximum ventilation volume (MVV) metrics. CT quantitative analysis, including tissue segmentation and threshold-based quantification of lung abnormalities, was performed using 3D-Slicer software to calculate the percentage of normal lung areas (NL%), percentage of ground-glass opacity areas (GGO%), percentage of fibrotic area (F%) and abnormal lesion area percentage (AA%). Semi-quantitative analyses were performed by two experienced radiologists to assess disease progression. The aortic-to-sternal distance (ASD) was measured on axial images as a standardized parameter. Spearman or Pearson correlation analysis and multivariate stepwise linear regression were used to analyze the relationship between the data in each group, and the ROC curve was used to determine the optimal quantitative CT metrics for identifying IPF and controls. Results: ROC curve analysis showed that F% distinguished the IPF patient group from the control group with the largest area under the curve (AUC) of 0.962 (95% confidence interval: 0.85-0.96). Additionally, with F% = 4.05% as the threshold, the Youden's J statistic was 0.827, with a sensitivity of 92.3% and a specificity of 90.4%. The ASD was significantly lower in the late stage of progression than in the early stage (t = 5.691, P < 0.001), with a mean reduction of 2.45% per month. Quantitative CT indices correlated with all pulmonary function parameters except FEV1/FVC, with the highest correlation coefficients observed for F% and TLC%, FEV1%, FVC%, MVV% (r = - 0.571, - 0.520, - 0.521, - 0.555, respectively, all P-values < 0.001), and GGO% was significantly correlated with DLCO% (r = - 0.600, P < 0.001). Multiple stepwise linear regression analysis showed that F% was the best predictor of TLC%, FEV1%, FVC%, and MVV% (R2 = 0.301, 0.301, 0.300, and 0.302, respectively, all P-values < 0.001), and GGO% was the best predictor of DLCO% (R2 = 0.360, P < 0.001). Conclusions: Quantitative CT analysis can be used to diagnose IPF and assess lung function impairment. A decrease in the ASD may indicate disease progression.