Abstract:The maximum sensitivity function as the conventional robustness index is often used to test the robustness and cannot be used to tune the controller parameters directly. To reduce analytical difficulties in dealing with the maximum sensitivity function and improve the control performance of the proportional-integral-derivative controller, the relative delay margin as a good alternative is proposed to offer a simple robust analysis for the proportional-integral-derivative controller and the first-order plus dead-time systems. The relationship between the parameters of the proportional-integral-derivative controller and the new pair, e.g., the phase margin and the corresponding gain crossover frequency, is derived. Based on this work, the stability regions of the proportional-integral-derivative controller parameters, the proportional gain and the integral gain with a given derivative gain, are obtained in a simple way. The tuning of the proportional-integral-derivative controller with constraints on the relative delay margin is simplified into an optimal disturbance rejection problem and the tuning procedure is summarized. For convenience, the recommended parameters are also offered. Simulation results demonstrate that the proposed methodology has better tracking and disturbance rejection performance than other comparative design methodologies of the proportional-integral/proportional-integral-derivative controller. For example, the integrated absolute errors of the proposed proportional-integral-derivative controller for the tracking performance and disturbance rejection performance are less than 91.3% and 91.7% of the integrated absolute errors of other comparative controllers in Example 3, respectively. The proposed methodology shows great potential in industrial applications. Besides, the proposed method can be applied to the design of the proportional-integral-derivative controller with filtered derivative which is recommended for practical applications to weaken the adverse influence of the high-frequency measurement noise.

Delay Margin Achievable by PID Controllers

PID Passivity-Based Control of Port-Hamiltonian Systems.

Performance assessment of PID controller with time-variant disturbance dynamics

Classical Stability Margins by PID Control

A PID Controller with Desired Closed-Loop Time Response and Stability Margin

Maximization of Gain/Phase Margins by PID Control

PID CONTROL FOR INTEGRATOR AND DEAD TIME PROCESS

Discrete PID Control for Integrator Processes with Time Delay

Stabilization of lti time-delayed processes using analytical pid controllers

A new PID controller design with constraints on relative delay margin for first-order plus dead- time systems

Robust digital double PI control for a general process with time-varying time delay

Design PID Controllers for Desired Time-Domain or Frequency-Domain Response

PID Design of Unstable Process by Using Closed Loop Constraints

Delay Margin for Predictive PI Control System

Robust Digital PI Control for Uncertain Time‐delay Systems in Process Industry

Optimal Proportional–Integral–Derivative Control of Time-Delay Systems Using the Differential Quadrature Method

A New Pso-Pid Tuning Method for Time-Delay Processes

Performance assessment of PID controller based on two-layer structure

Robust PID controller design for positioning systems with hysteresis and time-varying delay

Stability of PID-Controlled Linear Time-Delay Feedback Systems

PID controller based on gain margin and phase margin