Abstract:Baseflow is a major transport pathway for non-point source (NPS) pollutants. Watershed water quality (WWQ) models calibrated by low-quality data may produce misleading predictions of baseflow NPS pollutant loads, resulting in poor management decisions. We evaluated how models of the baseflow nitrate loads in the Huron River basin, southwest of Lake Erie, were affected by uncertainty in the calibration data. Based on a five-year time series of daily streamflow, nitrate concentration, and specific conductance, two sets of "observed" baseflow nitrate load data that include uncertainty were estimated using various tracer-based and non-tracer-based hydrograph separation methods, in conjunction with assumptions regarding baseflow nitrate concentrations. We calibrated the Soil and Water Assessment Tool plus (SWAT+) model with the two "observed" data sets and used the Generalized Likelihood Uncertainty Estimation (GLUE) approach to quantify parameter and predictive uncertainties. The results showed that baseflow accounted for 26 %-34 % of the mean annual total streamflow (11.8 m3/s) and 8 %-37 % of the mean annual total nitrate load (14.3 kg·ha-1·year-1) in the Huron River basin. The baseflow and nitrate load estimates from the non-tracer-based methods resembled those from the tracer-based method but had greater uncertainty. The posterior parameter distributions, as well as the weighted means and 90 % prediction intervals of the simulated baseflow nitrate loads, exhibited minimal variation when different calibration data sets for SWAT+ and different threshold likelihood values for GLUE were used. Our analysis emphasizes the necessity of calibrating WWQ models with baseflow pollutant loads/concentrations when addressing water quality issues related to baseflow. It also demonstrates the feasibility of utilizing multiple non-tracer-based hydrograph separation methods to estimate baseflow NPS pollutant loads. These non-tracer-based methods offer a simplicity and broader applicability compared to tracer-based methods. This study has provided insights into how calibration data uncertainty impacts the modeling of NPS pollution in baseflow and highlights the practical value of non-tracer-based hydrograph separation methods.

Addressing the Uncertainty in Modeling Watershed Nonpoint Source Pollution

Coupling Watershed Environmental Model with Optimizing Method to Provide Least Cost Alternatives in Environmental Planning and Management

Decision-making in Water Management under Uncertainty

Uncertainty Analysis in Statistical Modeling of Extreme Hydrological Events

[Uncertainty Analysis of Water Environmental Capacity in the Nonpoint Source Polluted River].

An Inversed Bayesian Modeling Approach for Estimating Nitrogen Export Coefficients and Uncertainty Assessment in an Agricultural Watershed in Eastern China

Uncertainty and Risk in Water Quality Modelling and Management

Uncertainty assessment for watershed water quality modeling: A Probabilistic Collocation Method based approach

Integrated modelling under uncertainty in watershed-level assessment and management

Application of Probabilistic Collocation Method in the Uncertainty Analysis for Watershed Non-point Source Pollution Modeling

Uncertainty assessment in watershed-scale water quality modeling and management: 1. Framework and application of generalized likelihood uncertainty estimation (GLUE) approach

Risk-Based Water Quality Management in River System

Water quality simulation modeling and uncertainty analysis for risk assessment and decision making

Uncertainty analysis of watershed pollution loads: Application to Tangxun Lake

Markov Chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) Uncertainty Analysis for Watershed Water Quality Modeling and Management

A Real-Time, Dynamic Early-Warning Model Based on Uncertainty Analysis and Risk Assessment for Sudden Water Pollution Accidents

Possibilistic Stochastic Water Management Model for Agricultural Nonpoint Source Pollution

Stochastic Watershed Water Quality Simulation for TMDL Development – A Case Study in the Newport Bay Watershed1

Review on Uncertainty Analysis Methods for Non-point Sources Pollution

How uncertainty in calibration data affects the modeling of non-point source pollutant loads in baseflow

Uncertainty in critical source area predictions from watershed-scale hydrologic models