Abstract:Background: Monoamniotic twin pregnancies are formed when a single egg is fertilised and the resulting inner cell mass splits to form twins sharing the same amniotic sac. This condition is rare and affects about one in 10,000 pregnancies overall. Monoamniotic twin pregnancies are susceptible to complications including cord entanglement, increased congenital anomalies, intrauterine growth restriction, twin-to-twin transfusion syndrome and increased perinatal mortality. All twin pregnancies also carry additional maternal risks including pre-eclampsia, anaemia, antepartum haemorrhage, postpartum haemorrhage and operative delivery.The optimal timing for the delivery of monoamniotic twins is not known. The options include 'planned early delivery' between 32 and 34 weeks, or alternatively awaiting spontaneous labour at least up until the usual time of planned delivery for other monochorionic twins (approximately 36 to 38 weeks' gestation), unless there is a specific indication for earlier delivery. Objectives: To assess whether routine early delivery in monoamniotic twin pregnancies improves fetal, neonatal or maternal outcomes compared with 'expectant management'. Expectant management means awaiting spontaneous labour at least up until the usual time of planned delivery for other monochorionic twins (approximately 36 to 38 weeks' gestation in many centres), unless a specific indication for delivery occurs in the meantime, e.g. for non-reassuring antenatal testing. Search methods: We searched the Cochrane Pregnancy and Childbirth Group's Trials Register (31 March 2015). Selection criteria: Published and unpublished randomised controlled trials (including cluster-randomised trials) comparing outcomes for women and infants who were randomised to planned early delivery of a monoamniotic twin pregnancy with outcomes for women and infants who were randomised to either planned term delivery or expectant management. However, we did not identify any trials for inclusion in this review.Quasi-randomised controlled trials, trials published in abstract form only, and trials using a cross-over design are not eligible for inclusion in this review. Data collection and analysis: No trials were identified by the search strategy. Main results: No trials were identified by the search strategy. Authors' conclusions: Monoamniotic twins are rare, and there is insufficient randomised controlled evidence on which to draw strong conclusions about the best management. In their absence, we can refer to historical case series and expert consensus. Management plans should take into consideration the availability of high-quality neonatal care if early delivery is chosen. Women and their families should be involved in the decision making about these high-risk pregnancies.Ongoing, multicentre audits of maternal and perinatal outcomes for monoamniotic twins are needed in order to inform families and clinicians about up-to-date perinatal outcomes with contemporary obstetric practice. Research should consider the social and economic implications of planned interventions, as well as the perinatal outcomes.

Optimal Delivery Timing for Twin Pregnancies: A Population-Based Retrospective Cohort Study

Is Cesarean Delivery Preferable in Twin Pregnancies at >=36 Weeks Gestation?

Perinatal Outcomes and Risk Factors for Preterm Birth in Twin Pregnancies in a Chinese Population: A Multi-center Retrospective Study

Temporal Trends and Adverse Perinatal Outcomes of Twin Pregnancies at Differing Gestational Ages: an Observational Study from China Between 2012–2020

Risk Factors for Twin Pregnancy in Women Undergoing Double Cleavage Embryo Transfer

A Multicentered and Retrospective Study on the Timing for Delivery in Twin Pregnancies

Effect of vaginal delivery and cesarean section on twin pregnancy outcomes and pregnancy associated risk factors

Obstetric Outcomes for Twins from Different Conception Methods - A Multicenter Cross-Sectional Study from China.

Mode of delivery and neonatal outcomes in preterm twins less than 32 weeks of gestation or birthweight under 1500 g: a systematic review and meta-analyses

fDefining intertwin birth weight discordance and optimal delivery time in dichorionic twins: a retrospective cohort study

Neonatal respiratory complications in twins at 36–38 weeks of gestation

Timing of delivery in women with diabetes: A population-based study

Delayed Interval Delivery and Infant Survival: a Population-Based Study

Neonatal outcomes according to actual delivery mode after planned vaginal delivery in women with a twin pregnancy

Evaluating 2 year outcome in twins < or = 30 weeks gestation at birth: a regional perinatal unit's experience

Outcomes of Twin Neonates and Association with Chorionicity and Modes of Conception

Optimal Timing for Elective Caesarean Delivery in a Chinese Population: a Large Hospital-Based Retrospective Cohort Study in Shanghai

Delayed interval delivery of preterm multiples: experience from a large specialized twin center

Optimal management strategies for promoting gestational extension in dichorionic diamniotic twin pregnancies

Exploring the Optimal Intertwin Delivery Interval for Vaginal Delivery

Planned early delivery versus expectant management for monoamniotic twins