Abstract:Agricultural straw and livestock wastewater were the main source of agricultural contaminant, how to reduce, reuse and recycle these wastes has become more and more important. Anaerobic digestion is an attractive technique for bio-waste treatment which can produce biogas and bio-fertilizer. Co-digested two and more wastes is beneficial for anaerobic digestion. By this way, we can not only get more biogas, but also reduce the investment of biogas plant. Two or more agricultural wastes were converted to biogas in one anaerobic bioreactor. Although much work has been done on anaerobic co-digestion of two or more bio-wastes, but most work was done with batch model and there was no report on anaerobic co-digestion of agricultural straw and livestock wastewater. In pig farming, swine wastewater is the main contaminant and is generated every day, so swine wastewater must be added to the anaerobic digester daily, which means that we must use semi-continuous feeding bioreactor in a pig farm biogas plant. In this study, the feasibility of straw-bed anaerobic bioreactor (SAB) was investigated. In the straw-bed bioreactor, baling straw was used as the stationary phase and swine wastewater was used as the mobile phase, and a wastewater advanced anaerobic bioreactor (USR) was connected to the posterior of the straw-bed bioreactor. The results showed that the straw-bed anaerobic digestion system (SADS) was feasible and there was no significant difference between co-digestion and mono-digestion of straw and swine wastewater. The total solid biogas yield of straw of SAB and mono-digestion were 394.96 and 382.11 mL/g, respectively. Compared to mono-digestion, the stability of daily biogas yield and average methane content of co-digestion was improved significantly. The average methane content of SADS, baling straw and swine wastewater digested alone were 57.40%, 47.32% and 60.37%, respectively. The volumetric biogas production was also improved significantly and the volumetric biogas production of treatment of baling straw and swine wastewater digested alone were 69.42% and 66.94% to that of SADS. After 35 days reaction, air permeability of baling straw was decreased which leading to more serious floating of baling straw and short flow of influent. After that, COD content of effluent increased sharply and then maintained at higher level. Meanwhile daily biogas yield of wastewater advanced anaerobic bioreactor increased sharply. Therefore, it is necessary to connect a wastewater advanced anaerobic bioreactor to the posterior of straw-bed bioreactor in order to deep purification of effluent of SAB. The above results indicated that co-digested baling straw and swine wastewater in straw-bed anaerobic digestion system is feasible and is beneficial for biogas production.

Improved environmental sustainability and bioenergy recovery through pig manure and food waste on-farm co-digestion in Ireland

Characteristics of Biogas Producing by Anaerobic Co-Digestion of Agricultural Straw and Swine Wastewater Based on Improved Straw-Bed Bioreactor

Environmental Sustainability Assessment of Pig Manure Mono- and Co-Digestion and Dynamic Land Application of the Digestate

Environmental Impact Analysis of Food Waste Anaerobic Digestion and Products Utilization Process

Environmental impact and optimization suggestions of pig manure and wastewater treatment systems from a life cycle perspective

Life cycle assessment of manure management and nutrient recycling from a Chinese pig farm

Environmental sustainability assessment of a new food waste anaerobic digestion and pyrolysis hybridization system

Agricultural wastes co-densification: A solution for seasonal feedstock storage and anaerobic digestion performance improvement

Reuse of Composted Food Waste from Rural China As Vermicomposting Substrate: Effects on Earthworms, Associated Microorganisms, and Economic Benefits

Closing the food waste loop: Analysis of the agronomic performance and potential of food waste disposal products

Life cycle assessment of integrated solid state anaerobic digestion and composting for on-farm organic residues treatment

Comparative environmental and economic life cycle assessment of dry and wet anaerobic digestion for treating food waste and biogas digestate

Pilot-scale anaerobic co-digestion of municipal biomass waste: Focusing on biogas production and GHG reduction

Opportunities for centralized regional mode of manure and sewage management in pig farming: The evidence from environmental and economic performance

Environmental and cost benefits of co-digesting food waste at wastewater treatment facilities

Solid Digestate Disposal Strategies to Reduce the Environmental Impact and Energy Consumption of Food Waste-Based Biogas Systems.

Metagenomic characterization of the enhanced performance of multicomponent synergistic thermophilic anaerobic co-digestion of food waste utilizing kitchen waste or garden waste as co-substrate

A life cycle assessment of an enterprise's low-carbon emissions model: The Xinjiang Shihezi pig farm faecal treatment biogas project as a case study

Comprehensive assessment of food waste treatment emission reduction in China: a life cycle perspective

Study on the Environmental Impact and Benefits of Incorporating Humus Composites in Anaerobic Co-Digestion Treatment

Biowaste management by hydrothermal carbonization and anaerobic co-digestion: Synergistic effects and comparative metagenomic analysis