Comparing FOLFOXIRI Plus Bevacizumab with Doublet Chemotherapy Plus Anti-Egfr Antibody: A Systemic Review and Network Meta-Analysis.
Jianwei Zhang,Jianxia Li,Xiaoyu Xie,Yue Cai,Zehua Wu,Huabin Hu,Miaomiao Ding,Yanhong Deng
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2020.38.4_suppl.97
IF: 45.3
2020-01-01
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Abstract:97 Background: FOLFOXIRI plus bevacizumab (Triplet+Bev) improved survival benefit when comparing with doublet chemotherapy plus Bev (doublet+Bev) as initial treatment in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). Several trials also compared the efficacy of doublet plus EGFR antibody (doublet+EGFRi) with doublet+Bev. However, little is known about triplet+Bev comparing with doublet +EGFRi in mCRC. Methods: We did a systematic review and network meta-analysis with a systematic literature search on PubMed, EMbase, Web of Science, and international oncology conferences. We included phase 2 and 3 randomized controlled trials investigating FOLFOXIRI+Bev versus doublet+Bev or doublet+EGFRi versus doublet+Bev as first-line treatments in mCRC. A Bayesian network meta-analysis was done to compare hazard ratios (HRs) for PFS and OS in overall population, Ras wild type population, left or right side patients, left or right-side Ras wild-type population. And to compare relative risk (RR) for objective response rates. Results: Eight trials involving 3980 patients were included. In direct comparison, Triplet+Bev was superior to doublet+EGFRi both in OS (HR 0.83 0.72-0.97), PFS (HR 0.73, 0.65-0.83)and ORR (RR 1.5, 1.2-2.0). Doublet+EGFRi was beneficial in OS (HR 1.2, 1.1-1.5) and ORR (RR 0.74, 0.52-0.97) than doublet+Bev, but not PFS. In indirect comparison, Triplet+Bev showed no difference to doublet+EGFRi in OS (HR 1.0, 0.84-1.4) and ORR (RR 1.1, 0.73-1.6) in all population, and improved PFS (HR 0.71, 0.60-0.86). In left side RAS wild-type subgroup, Triplet+Bev showed similar efficacy in OS (HR 1.2, 0.6-2.5), PFS (HR 1.6, 0.59-4.3), and ORR (RR 0.63, 0.22-15). But in Right-side subgroup, Triplet+Bev was beneficial both in OS (HR 0.41, 0.18-0.93) and PFS (HR 0.55, 0.34-0.92). In right-side RAS wild-type subgroup, Triplet+Bev also showed trend of longer OS (HR 0.37, 0.12-1.1) and PFS (HR 0.43, 0.18-1.1) than doublet+EGFRi. Conclusions: In left-side RAS wild-type mCRC, FOLFOXIRI+Bev showed similar efficacy to doublet+EGFRi. While in right-side subgroup or right-side RAS wild-type population, Triplet+Bev is preferable as initial treatment for mCRC, in the meanwhile, in cautious of AE.