Role of Forest Succession on Carbon Sequestration of Forest Ecosystems in Lower Subtropical China
方运霆,莫江明,彭少麟,李德军
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3321/j.issn:1000-0933.2003.09.001
2003-01-01
Acta Ecologica Sinica
Abstract:There is the potential to reduce carbon sources and increase carbon sinks from management of the world's forests. Carbon emissions from forests can be reduced by protecting and conserving the carbon pools in existing forests. Carbon sinks can be created by expanding carbon storage capacities through increasing the area and/or carbon density of native forests, plantations and agroforests. With the implement of Natural Forest Protection Program and Forest Reservation Project in the near future, it can be predicted that Chinese forest ecosystems will act as a huge carbon sink. However, there is little information available about carbon sequestration on forest ecosystems, especially on forest ecosystems of subtropical China. This research was conducted in Dinghushan Biosphere Reserve (DHSBR), which is located in lower subtropical China. There are mainly three types of forest, including Pine Forest (PF), Pine and Broadleaf Mixed Forest (PBMF), and Monsoon Evergreen Broadleaf Forest (MEBF), which represent three stages of a series of forest succession. The carbon storage and its distribution pattern in these forest ecosystems were studied, and the potential, rate and allocation of carbon sequestrated by forest ecosystems based on this study were also discussed in this paper. Results showed as follows:(1) The mean carbon concentrations of vegetation decreased with the development of PF ecosystem. Carbon concentrations for plant organs except for leaves were generally 20 percent higher in PF than those in MEBF. Both PF and MEBF, carbon concentrations were significantly higher in tree layer than those in other layers comparing with different layers, and generally highest in root or branches comparing with different organs.(2) Biomass of trees in the studied forests increased with development of forest succession, and was estimated to be: 1435t/hm2 (PF), 2701t/hm2 (PBMF) and 4078t/hm2 (MEBF). This biomass was mostly distributed in the component of stem and bark. The percentages of different organs accounted for tree biomass were: 570% stem and bark, 209% root, 193% branch, 28% leaves, respectively Biomass of understory plant was 423~1410t/hm2, decreasing with development of forest succession. Similar to biomass of understory, standing stock of litters on the forest floor decreased with development of forest succession, ranging from 392 to 1091t/hm2. (3) Soil bulk density was 086~154g/cm3, and increased generally with depths (107g/cm3, 125 g/cm3, 130g/cm3 and 130g/cm3 for 0~10cm, 10~20cm, 20~40cm and 40~60cm soil depth, respectively) in all forests. Soil bulk density in all levels of soil depths in PF were similar to those in PBMF, however, in both forests they were higher than those in MEBF. Soil carbon concentrations in all forests decreased with soil depths (223%, 113%, 071% and 049% for 0~10cm, 10~20cm, 20~40cm and 40~60cm soil depth, respectively) and exhibited in the following order: MEBF PBMF PF. (4) The total carbon storage of three forest ecosystems was estimated to be: 1358t/hm2 (PF), 2151t/hm2 (PBMF) and 2597t/hm2 (MEBF), of which 676 percent was contributed by vegetation, 302 percent by soil, and only 22 percent by standing litters on the floor. Comparing with other similar forests, the carbon storage in vegetation was relatively higher in the studied forests, the carbon storage in soils, however, was relatively lower in the studied forests. The ratio of vegetation carbon to soil carbon in these forests was very high (224), comparing with the average value for Global forest and Chinese forest (046 and 036, respectively). In addition, the proportion of carbon storage in the upper 20cm soil to that in the whole soil in the studied forests was also higher, comparing with the average value for Global forest and Chinese forest.(5) The carbon sequestration increased significantly with development of forest succession in lower subtropical China. Carbon storage would increase by 58 percent