Individualized Adaptive Radiotherapy Versus Standard Radiotherapy with Chemotherapy for Patients with Locally Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Multicenter Randomized Phase III Clinical Trial CRTOG1601

S. Yuan,Q. Yu,S. Wang,Y. Xu,H. Ge,J. Wang,S. Zhang,W. Chen,J. Li,Q. Song,W. Gu,J. Yan,X. Li,H. Zhang,D. Huang,B. Wang,C. Ai,L. Zhao,Y. Song,J. Yu
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2020.07.2286
2020-01-01
Abstract:With the idea that proper dose-escalation radiotherapy would improve overall survival without increasing the probability of normal tissue complications, a trial was performed to compare overall survival after standard-dose versus individualized dose escalation based on FDG PET/CT and adaptive radiotherapy with chemotherapy for patients with inoperable stage III non-small-cell lung cancer(NSCLC). In this multicenter open-label randomized phase 3 trial in China, we enrolled patients (aged ≥18 years) with unresectable stage III NSCLC and randomly assigned (1:1) patients to receive either standard dose (60Gy/30fractions) or individualized adaptive dose escalation (≧66 Gy/30fractions) radiotherapy with concurrent and consolidation chemotherapy. In individualized group, the patients underwent CT and PET-based treatment planning at baseline and had CT resimulation and PET-CT in the original position after 18-20 fractions to tumor was delivered. A dose escalation ranged from 22-32Gy were delivered in 10 fractions in the second round to the adaptive target recontoured from the mid-treatment PET/CT with a regular normal tissue complication probability. Pemetrexed plus cisplatin was delivered for adenocarcinoma patients and docetaxel plus cisplatin was delivered for squamous cell carcinoma patients as concurrent and consolidation. The OS, PFS, ORR and adverse events were observed and assessed. From March 2014 to December 2018, 243 patients with inoperable stage III NSCLC were enrolled and 226 of them were included in statistical analysis who accomplished concurrent chemoradiotherapy, 2 cycles consolidation chemotherapy and at least 1 follow-up visit. than Compared to standard group, individualized group got significantly better OS (44.6 months vs 28.0 months, P = 0.001) and PFS (15.1 months vs. 11.6 months, P = 0.001) and similar objective response rates (73.33% vs. 65.29%, P = 0.192). Patients in both groups were well tolerated and no severe adverse events were significantly different. This randomized phase III multicenter trial demonstrated that individualized dose escalation to the adaptive target based on mid-treatment PET scans and IMRT achieved significantly better overall survival and progression free survival than standard 60Gy while got similar normal tissue complication probability in patients with locally advanced NSCLC.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?