Modulation Effect of CHK-1/-2 Inhibitor on Preclinical Head and Neck Cancer in Vivo Tumor Response to Proton and X-ray Radiation Therapy

L. Wang,J. Cao,Z. Liu,E. Lin,X. Lu,Y. Li,M. Chen,M. Kerr,X. Wang,B. Jiang,F. Poenisch,M. Yang,A. S. Gautam,R. Y. Wu,X. Zhang,J. Swain,N. Sahoo,X. R. Zhu,S. J. Frank
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2020.07.1744
2020-01-01
Abstract:The second-generation Checkpoint kinase 1/2 inhibitor prexasertib is in phase II clinical trials for cancer treatment. The effects and optimized combination schedules of prexasertib with x-ray radiotherapy (XRT) versus proton radiotherapy (PRT) in human head and neck cancers (HNSCC) are unclear. We investigated these unknowns in HNSCC tumor xenografts of differing human papillomavirus (HPV) status. HNSCC tumor xenografts HN5 (HPV-) and UMSCC-47 (HPV+) were used. Treatments were initiated when tumors growing in the hind leg of nude mice reached 8 mm in average diameter. Fractionated XRT or PRT (2 Gy per fraction) was delivered once daily, 5 days a week, for a total dose of 30 Gy. Prexasertib was given by subcutaneous injection once daily (4 mg/kg, 1 h before radiation), 5 days a week. Mice received (i) no treatment, (ii) prexasertib, (iii) XRT, (iv) PRT, (v) prexasertib in combination with radiation. For the combination treatment, prexasertib was given concurrently with radiation, or induction for 1 week followed by concurrent with radiation. Mice were euthanized when the tumors reached 12.0 mm in average diameter. The endpoint was overall survival time (OS) of mice (defined as the number of days from treatment initiation to mice euthanasia). The OS of mice exposed to radiation versus radiation plus prexasertib was compared by a Kaplan-Meier analysis. The OS of untreated tumors was 22.7 ± 5.2 days for the HPV- HN5, and was 26.1 ± 1.6 days for the HPV+ UMSCC-47. Prexasertib alone extended the OS to 35.0 ± 3.3 days in HN5 xenografts, but had no effect on the OS in UMSCC-47 xenografts. Additional prexasertib extended the OS of radiation in both HN5 (from 71.5 ± 18.1 days to 101.2 ± 14.0 days for XRT; from 99.1 ± 14.2 days to 110.7 ± 12.4 days for PRT) and UMSCC-47 (from 27.0 ± 2.9 days to 62.00 ± 19.7 days for XRT; from 82.3 ± 20.6 days to 104.7 ± 15.5 days for PRT) xenografts. The potency of combination treatment was greater in concurrent than induction plus concurrent in the UMSCC-47 xenografts exposed to XRT; while it was greater in induction plus concurrent than concurrent in the HN5 xenografts exposed to XRT, and in the UMSCC-47 xenografts exposed to PRT. Maximum OS was observed when prexasertib was given concurrently with PRT in the HN5 xenografts (110.7 ± 12.4 days), and when induction plus concurrent prexasertib was given with PRT in the UMSCC-47 xenografts (104.7 ± 15.5 days). In conclusion, prexasertib strongly enhanced the effect of PRT and XRT on tested HPV- (HN5) and HPV+ (UMSCC-47) HNSCC tumor xenografts. The best OS were observed when concurrently combined with PRT in HN5 xenografts and induction plus concurrently combined with PRT in UMSCC-47 xenografts. These data may help to inform the design of future clinical trials in optimizing the selection of radiation modalities in combination with systematic treatment.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?