Abstract:No AccessEngineering NotesConstrained Control Allocation of a Quadrotor-Like Autonomous Underwater VehicleLiwei Kou, Shiming He, Yanjun Li and Ji XiangLiwei KouZhejiang University, 310027 Hangzhou, People’s Republic of China*Ph.D. Candidate, State Key Laboratory of Industrial Control Technology and College of Electrical Engineering; .Search for more papers by this author, Shiming HeZhejiang University, 310027 Hangzhou, People’s Republic of China†Ph.D. Candidate, State Key Laboratory of Industrial Control Technology and College of Electrical Engineering; .Search for more papers by this author, Yanjun LiZhejiang University City College, 310015 Hangzhou, People’s Republic of China‡Professor, School of Information and Electrical Engineering; (Corresponding Author).Search for more papers by this author and Ji XiangZhejiang University, 310027 Hangzhou, People’s Republic of China§Professor, State Key Laboratory of Industrial Control Technology and College of Electrical Engineering; .Search for more papers by this authorPublished Online:8 Jan 2021https://doi.org/10.2514/1.G005308SectionsRead Now ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload citationTrack citations ShareShare onFacebookTwitterLinked InRedditEmail About References [1] Huang B. and Yang Q., “Double-Loop Sliding Mode Controller with a Novel Switching Term for the Trajectory Tracking of Work-Class ROVs,” Ocean Engineering, Vol. 178, April 2019, pp. 80–94. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2019.02.043 Google Scholar[2] Tanakitkorn K., Wilson P. A., Turnock S. R. and Phillips A. B., “Sliding Mode Heading Control of an Overactuated, Hover-Capable Autonomous Underwater Vehicle with Experimental Verification,” Journal of Field Robotics, Vol. 35, No. 3, 2018, pp. 396–415. https://doi.org/10.1002/rob.21766 CrossrefGoogle Scholar[3] Nakajoh H., Osawa H., Miyazaki T., Hirata K., Sawa T. and Utsugi H., “Development of Work Class ROV Applied for Submarine Resource Exploration in JAMSTEC,” 2012 Oceans–Yeosu, Inst. of Electrical and Electronics Engineering, New York, May 2012, pp. 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1109/OCEANS-Yeosu.2012.6263437 Google Scholar[4] Casavola A. and Garone E., “Fault-Tolerant Adaptive Control Allocation Schemes for Overactuated Systems,” International Journal of Robust and Nonlinear Control, Vol. 20, No. 17, 2010, pp. 1958–1980. https://doi.org/10.1002/rnc.1561 CrossrefGoogle Scholar[5] Durham W. C., “Constrained Control Allocation,” Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, Vol. 16, No. 4, 1993, pp. 717–725. https://doi.org/10.2514/3.21072 LinkGoogle Scholar[6] Johansen T. A., Fossen T. I. and Tøndel P., “Efficient Optimal Constrained Control Allocation via Multiparametric Programming,” Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, Vol. 28, No. 3, 2005, pp. 506–515. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.10780 LinkGoogle Scholar[7] Wang J. and Longoria R. G., “Coordinated Vehicle Dynamics Control with Control Distribution,” 2006 American Control Conference, Inst. of Electrical and Electronics Engineering, New York, June 2006, pp. 5348–5353. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACC.2006.1657573 Google Scholar[8] Snell S. A., Enns D. F. and Garrard W. L., “Nonlinear Inversion Flight Control for a Supermaneuverable Aircraft,” Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, Vol. 15, No. 4, 1992, pp. 976–984. https://doi.org/10.2514/3.20932 LinkGoogle Scholar[9] Khan H. Z. I., Rajput J., Ahmed S., Sarmad M. and Sharjil M., “Robust Control of Overactuated Autonomous Underwater Vehicle,” 2018 15th International Bhurban Conference on Applied Sciences and Technology, Inst. of Electrical and Electronics Engineering, New York, Jan. 2018, pp. 269–275. https://doi.org/10.1109/IBCAST.2018.8312235 Google Scholar[10] Tohidi S. S., Khaki Sedigh A. and Buzorgnia D., “Fault Tolerant Control Design Using Adaptive Control Allocation Based on the Pseudo Inverse Along the Null Space,” International Journal of Robust and Nonlinear Control, Vol. 26, No. 16, 2016, pp. 3541–3557. https://doi.org/10.1002/rnc.3518 CrossrefGoogle Scholar[11] Ji S.-W., Bui V. P., Balachandran B. and Kim Y.-B., “Robust Control Allocation Design for Marine Vessel,” Ocean Engineering, Vol. 63, May 2013, pp. 105–111. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2013.02.004 CrossrefGoogle Scholar[12] Shen C., Shi Y. and Buckham B., “Trajectory Tracking Control of an Autonomous Underwater Vehicle Using Lyapunov-Based Model Predictive Control,” IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, Vol. 65, No. 7, 2018, pp. 5796–5805. https://doi.org/10.1109/TIE.2017.2779442 Google Scholar[13] Fossen T. I. and Johansen T. A., “A Survey of Control Allocation Methods for Ships and Underwater Vehicles,” 2006 14th Mediterranean Conference on Control and Automation, Inst. of Electrical and Electronics Engineering, New York, June 2006, pp. 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1109/MED.2006.328749 Google Scholar[14] Johansen T. A. and Fossen T. I., “Control Allocation—A Survey,” Automatica, Vol. 49, No. 5, 2013, pp. 1087–1103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.automatica.2013.01.035 CrossrefGoogle Scholar[15] Oppenheimer M. W., Doman D. B. and Bolender M. A., “Control Allocation for Over-Actuated Systems,” 2006 14th Mediterranean Conference on Control and Automation, Inst. of Electrical and Electronics Engineering, New York, June 2006, pp. 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1109/MED.2006.328750 Google Scholar[16] Zaccarian L., “Dynamic Allocation for Input Redundant Control Systems,” Automatica, Vol. 45, No. 6, 2009, pp. 1431–1438. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.automatica.2009.01.013 CrossrefGoogle Scholar[17] Härkegård O., “Dynamic Control Allocation Using Constrained Quadratic Programming,” Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, Vol. 27, No. 6, 2004, pp. 1028–1034. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.11607 LinkGoogle Scholar[18] Petersen J. A. M. and Bodson M., “Interior-Point Algorithms for Control Allocation,” Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, Vol. 28, No. 3, 2005, pp. 471–480. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.5937 LinkGoogle Scholar[19] Petersen J. A. M. and Bodson M., “Constrained Quadratic Programming Techniques for Control Allocation,” IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology, Vol. 14, No. 1, 2006, pp. 91–98. https://doi.org/10.1109/TCST.2005.860516 CrossrefGoogle Scholar[20] Petersen J. A. M. and Bodson M., “Fast Implementation of Direct Allocation with Extension to Coplanar Controls,” Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, Vol. 25, No. 3, 2002, pp. 464–473. https://doi.org/10.2514/2.4932 LinkGoogle Scholar[21] Naskar A. K., Patra S. and Sen S., “Reconfigurable Direct Allocation for Multiple Actuator Failures,” IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology, Vol. 23, No. 1, 2015, pp. 397–405. https://doi.org/10.1109/TCST.2014.2321665 CrossrefGoogle Scholar[22] Bian J., Xiang J. and Liang H., “A Quadrotor-Like Unmanned Underwater Vehicle,” Proceedings of the 28th IEEE Chinese Conference on Decision and Control, Inst. of Electrical and Electronics Engineering, New York, May 2016, pp. 6360–6365. https://doi.org/10.1109/CCDC.2016.7532143 Google Scholar[23] Durham W. C., “Attainable Moments for the Constrained Control Allocation Problem,” Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, Vol. 17, No. 6, 1994, pp. 1371–1373. https://doi.org/10.2514/3.21360 LinkGoogle Scholar[24] Durham W. C., “Constrained Control Allocation—Three-Moment Problem,” Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, Vol. 17, No. 2, 1994, pp. 330–336. https://doi.org/10.2514/3.21201 LinkGoogle Scholar[25] Xiang J., Zhong C. and Wei W., “General-Weighted Least-Norm Control for Redundant Manipulators,” IEEE Transactions on Robotics, Vol. 26, No. 4, 2010, pp. 660–669. https://doi.org/10.1109/TRO.2010.2050655 Google Scholar[26] Bian J. and Xiang J., “QUUV: A Quadrotor-Like Unmanned Underwater Vehicle with Thrusts Configured as X Shape,” Applied Ocean Research, Vol. 78, Sept. 2018, pp. 201–211. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apor.2018.06.017 CrossrefGoogle Scholar[27] He S., Kou L., Li Y. and Xiang J., “Robust Orientation-Sensitive Trajectory Tracking of Underactuated Autonomous Underwater Vehicles,” IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics (advanced online publication). https://doi.org/10.1109/TIE.2020.3013790 Google Scholar[28] Kou L., Xiang J., Li Y. and Bian J., “Stability and Nonlinear Controllability Analysis of a Quadrotor-Like Autonomous Underwater Vehicle Considering Variety of Cases,” International Journal of Advanced Robotic Systems, Vol. 15, No. 6, 2018, Paper 172988141881940. https://doi.org/10.1177/1729881418819401 Google Scholar[29] Kirchengast M., Steinberger M. and Horn M., “A Fast Quadratic Program Solver for Constrained Control Allocation,” Proceedings of the 57th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control, Inst. of Electrical and Electronics Engineering, New York, Dec. 2018, pp. 4065–4071. https://doi.org/10.1109/CDC.2018.8619828 Google Scholar[30] Härkegård O., “Efficient Active Set Algorithms for Solving Constrained Least Squares Problems in Aircraft Control Allocation,” Proceedings of the 41st IEEE Conference on Decision and Control, Inst. of Electrical and Electronics Engineering, New York, Dec. 2002, pp. 1295–1300. https://doi.org/10.1109/CDC.2002.1184694 Google Scholar[31] Burken J. J., Lu P., Wu Z. and Bahm C., “Two Reconfigurable Flight-Control Design Methods: Robust Servomechanism and Control Allocation,” Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, Vol. 24, No. 3, 2001, pp. 482–493. https://doi.org/10.2514/2.4769 LinkGoogle Scholar[32] Härkegård O., “QCAT-Quadratic Programming Control Allocation Toolbox for Matlab,” 2004, http://research.harkegard.se/qcat/ [retrieved 31 Aug. 2020]. Google Scholar Previous article Next article FiguresReferencesRelatedDetailsCited byControl allocation based fault tolerant control of descriptor system with actuator saturationISA Transactions, Vol. 129Fault diagnosis and reconfigurable control for underwater vehiclesOcean Engineering, Vol. 239 What's Popular Volume 44, Number 3March 2021 CrossmarkInformationCopyright © 2020 by the American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Inc. All rights reserved. All requests for copying and permission to reprint should be submitted to CCC at www.copyright.com; employ the eISSN 1533-3884 to initiate your request. See also AIAA Rights and Permissions www.aiaa.org/randp. TopicsAircraft Operations and TechnologyAircraft Stability and ControlAircraftsFlight Control SurfacesInterdisciplinary TopicsQuadcopterUnmanned Aerial VehicleVehicle TechnologyWatercraft KeywordsAutonomous Underwater VehicleQuadrotorModel Predictive ControlMATLABYawReal Time Control SystemEnergy ConsumptionFuel ConsumptionComputingAcknowledgmentsThis work is supported by the Key R&D Program of Zhejiang Province (2019C02002), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (62073290), and the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (2018XZZX001-06). We gratefully thank the associate editor and anonymous reviewers, whose comments helped improve and clarify this work. Also, we would like to thank Arman Goudarzi for language editing.PDF Received7 April 2020Accepted17 November 2020Published online8 January 2021

Abstract:No AccessEngineering NoteNonsingular Sliding-Mode Control for Field-of-View Constrained Impact Time GuidanceXiaotian Chen and Jinzhi WangXiaotian ChenState Key Laboratory for Turbulence and Complex Systems, Peking University, 100871 Beijing, People’s Republic of China*Ph.D. Candidate, Department of Mechanics and Engineering Science, College of Engineering; .Search for more papers by this author and Jinzhi WangState Key Laboratory for Turbulence and Complex Systems, Peking University, 100871 Beijing, People’s Republic of China†Professor, Department of Mechanics and Engineering Science, College of Engineering; (Corresponding Author).Search for more papers by this authorPublished Online:2 Jan 2018https://doi.org/10.2514/1.G003146SectionsRead Now ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload citationTrack citations ShareShare onFacebookTwitterLinked InRedditEmail About References [1] Jeon I.-S., Lee J.-I. and Tahk M.-J., “Impact-Time-Control Guidance Law for Anti-Ship Missiles,” IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology, Vol. 14, No. 2, 2006, pp. 260–266. doi:https://doi.org/10.1109/TCST.2005.863655 IETTE2 1063-6536 CrossrefGoogle Scholar[2] Jeon I.-S., Lee J.-I. and Tahk M.-J., “Impact-Time-Control Guidance with Generalized Proportional Navigation Based on Nonlinear Formulation,” Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, Vol. 39, No. 8, 2016, pp. 1887–1892. doi:https://doi.org/10.2514/1.G001681 JGCODS 0731-5090 LinkGoogle Scholar[3] Jeon I.-S., Lee J.-I. and Tahk M.-J., “Homing Guidance Law for Cooperative Attack of Multiple Missiles,” Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, Vol. 33, No. 1, 2010, pp. 275–280. doi:https://doi.org/10.2514/1.40136 JGCODS 0731-5090 LinkGoogle Scholar[4] Kim T.-H., Lee C.-H., Jeon I.-S. and Tahk M.-J., “Augmented Polynomial Guidance with Impact Time and Angle Constraints,” IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems, Vol. 49, No. 4, 2013, pp. 2806–2817. doi:https://doi.org/10.1109/TAES.2013.6621856 IEARAX 0018-9251 CrossrefGoogle Scholar[5] Kim M., Jung B., Han B., Lee S. and Kim Y., “Lyapunov-Based Impact Time Control Guidance Laws Against Stationary Targets,” IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems, Vol. 51, No. 2, 2015, pp. 1111–1122. doi:https://doi.org/10.1109/TAES.2014.130717 IEARAX 0018-9251 CrossrefGoogle Scholar[6] Kumar S. R. and Ghose D., “Sliding Mode Control Based Guidance Law with Impact Time Constraints,” American Control Conference (ACC), 2013, IEEE Publ., Piscataway, NJ, 2013, pp. 5760–5765. doi:https://doi.org/10.1109/ACC.2013.6580740 CrossrefGoogle Scholar[7] Kumar S. R. and Ghose D., “Impact Time Guidance for Large Heading Errors Using Sliding Mode Control,” IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems, Vol. 51, No. 4, 2015, pp. 3123–3138. doi:https://doi.org/10.1109/TAES.2015.140137 IEARAX 0018-9251 CrossrefGoogle Scholar[8] Cho D., Kim H. J. and Tahk M.-J., “Nonsingular Sliding Mode Guidance for Impact Time Control,” Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, Vol. 39, No. 1, 2015, pp. 61–68. doi:https://doi.org/10.2514/1.G001167 JGCODS 0731-5090 LinkGoogle Scholar[9] Cho N. and Kim Y., “Modified Pure Proportional Navigation Guidance Law for Impact Time Control,” Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, Vol. 39, No. 4, 2016, pp. 852–872. doi:https://doi.org/10.2514/1.G001618 JGCODS 0731-5090 LinkGoogle Scholar[10] Saleem A. and Ratnoo A., “Lyapunov-Based Guidance Law for Impact Time Control and Simultaneous Arrival,” Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, Vol. 39, No. 1, 2015, pp. 164–173. doi:https://doi.org/10.2514/1.G001349 JGCODS 0731-5090 LinkGoogle Scholar[11] Harl N. and Balakrishnan S., “Impact Time and Angle Guidance with Sliding Mode Control,” IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology, Vol. 20, No. 6, 2012, pp. 1436–1449. doi:https://doi.org/10.1109/TCST.2011.2169795 IETTE2 1063-6536 CrossrefGoogle Scholar[12] Erer K. S. and Tekin R., “Impact Time and Angle Control Based on Constrained Optimal Solutions,” Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, Vol. 39, No. 10, 2016, pp. 2448–2454. doi:https://doi.org/10.2514/1.G000414 JGCODS 0731-5090 LinkGoogle Scholar[13] Tekin R., Erer K. S. and Holzapfel F., “Control of Impact Time with Increased Robustness via Feedback Linearization,” Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, Vol. 39, No. 7, 2016, pp. 1682–1689. doi:https://doi.org/10.2514/1.G001719 JGCODS 0731-5090 LinkGoogle Scholar[14] Tekin R., Erer K. S. and Holzapfel F., “Polynomial Shaping of the Look Angle for Impact-Time Control,” Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, Vol. 40, No. 10, 2017, pp. 2668–2673. doi:https://doi.org/10.2514/1.G002751 JGCODS 0731-5090 LinkGoogle Scholar[15] Zhang Y., Wang X. and Wu H., “Impact Time Control Guidance Law with Field of View Constraint,” Aerospace Science and Technology, Vol. 39, Dec. 2014, pp. 361–369. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ast.2014.10.002 CrossrefGoogle Scholar[16] Kim H.-G. and Kim H. J., “Impact Time Control Guidance Considering Seeker’s Field-of-View Limits,” 2016 IEEE 55th Conference on Decision and Control (CDC), IEEE Publ., Piscataway, NJ, 2016, pp. 4160–4165. doi:https://doi.org/10.1109/CDC.2016.7798900 CrossrefGoogle Scholar[17] Zhang Y., Wang X. and Wu H., “Impact Time Control Guidance with Field-of-View Constraint Accounting for Uncertain System Lag,” Journal of Aerospace Engineering, Vol. 230, No. 3, 2016, pp. 515–529. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0954410015594401 Google Scholar[18] Jeon I. S. and Lee J. I., “Impact-Time-Control Guidance Law with Constraints on Seeker Look Angle,” IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems, Vol. 53, No. 5, Oct 2017, pp. 2621–2627. doi:https://doi.org/10.1109/TAES.2017.2698837 IEARAX 0018-9251 CrossrefGoogle Scholar[19] Feng Y., Yu X. and Han F., “On Nonsingular Terminal Sliding-Mode Control of Nonlinear Systems,” Automatica, Vol. 49, No. 6, 2013, pp. 1715–1722. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.automatica.2013.01.051 ATCAA9 0005-1098 CrossrefGoogle Scholar Previous article Next article FiguresReferencesRelatedDetailsCited byVarying-Gain Proportional Navigation Guidance for Precise Impact Time ControlWei Dong , Chunyan Wang, Jianan Wang and Ming Xin 13 November 2022 | Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, Vol. 46, No. 3Impact time control guidance against maneuvering targets based on a nonlinear virtual relative modelChinese Journal of Aeronautics, Vol. 14Lyapunov-Based Impact Time Control Guidance Law with Performance Prediction20 March 2023 | Aerospace, Vol. 10, No. 3Consensus-Based Finite-Time Cooperative Guidance with Field-of-View Constraint22 June 2022 | International Journal of Aeronautical and Space Sciences, Vol. 23, No. 5Nonlinear Optimal Guidance for Intercepting Stationary Targets with Impact-Time ConstraintsKun Wang , Zheng Chen , Han Wang, Jun Li and Xueming Shao30 May 2022 | Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, Vol. 45, No. 9Deep reinforcement learning-based impact time control guidance law with constraints on the field-of-viewAerospace Science and Technology, Vol. 128Terminal sliding mode guidance design under impact angle and time constraints in three-dimensional spaceCooperative Circular Guidance with Nonuniform Field-of-View ConstraintsYadong Chen, Daqing Guo, Jianan Wang , Jiayuan Shan and Ming Xin 31 March 2022 | Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, Vol. 45, No. 8Unified Method for Field-of-View-Limited Homing GuidanceWei Dong , Chunyan Wang, Jianan Wang , Hungsun Son and Ming Xin 17 April 2022 | Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, Vol. 45, No. 8Three-dimensional field of view and impact angle constrained guidance with terminal speed maximizationAerospace Science and Technology, Vol. 126Three-Dimensional Nonsingular Impact Time Guidance With Limited Field-of-ViewIEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology, Vol. 30, No. 4Fixed-Time Circular Impact-Time Guidance with Look Angle Constraint5 July 2022 | Aerospace, Vol. 9, No. 7Sliding mode–based simultaneous control of impact angle and impact time5 July 2021 | Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part G: Journal of Aerospace Engineering, Vol. 236, No. 7Fixed-Time Terminal Angle-Constrained Cooperative Guidance Law Against Maneuvering TargetIEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems, Vol. 58, No. 2Composite Guidance for Impact Time Control Under Physical ConstraintsIEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems, Vol. 58, No. 2Cooperative guidance laws against highly maneuvering target with impact time and angle15 June 2021 | Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part G: Journal of Aerospace Engineering, Vol. 236, No. 5A hybrid proportional navigation based two-stage impact time control guidance lawJournal of Systems Engineering and Electronics, Vol. 33, No. 2Three-Dimensional Impact Time Control Guidance Considering Field-of-View Constraint and Velocity Variation9 April 2022 | Aerospace, Vol. 9, No. 4Adjustable impact-time-control guidance law against non-maneuvering target under limited field of view17 May 2021 | Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part G: Journal of Aerospace Engineering, Vol. 236, No. 2Distributed Cooperative Guidance of Multi-missile with Unreliable Communications18 March 2022Three Dimensional Nonlinear Guidance Law for Exact Impact Time ControlIEEE Access, Vol. 10Three-Dimensional Prescribed-Time Pinning Group Cooperative Guidance LawInternational Journal of Aerospace Engineering, Vol. 2021Time-Constrained Individual Homing Guidance against Stationary TargetsThree-Dimensional Nonsingular Cooperative Guidance Law with Different Field-of-View ConstraintsWei Dong , Chunyan Wang, Jianan Wang and Ming Xin 6 September 2021 | Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, Vol. 44, No. 11Studies on Multi-Constraints Cooperative Guidance Method Based on Distributed MPC for Multi-Missiles17 November 2021 | Applied Sciences, Vol. 11, No. 22Look-Angle-Constrained Control of Arrival Time with Exact Knowledge of Time-to-GoNamhoon Cho and Seokwon Lee 26 May 2021 | Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, Vol. 44, No. 10Field-of-View Constrained Impact Time Guidance Against Stationary TargetsIEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems, Vol. 57, No. 5Field-of-View Constrained Impact Time Control Guidance via Time-Varying Sliding Mode Control6 September 2021 | Aerospace, Vol. 8, No. 9Optimal three-dimensional impact time guidance with seeker’s field-of-view constraintChinese Journal of Aeronautics, Vol. 34, No. 2Terminal Time-Constrained Nonlinear Interception Strategies Against Maneuvering TargetsShashi Ranjan Kumar and Dwaipayan Mukherjee2 September 2020 | Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, Vol. 44, No. 1Two-phase guidance law for impact time control under physical constraintsChinese Journal of Aeronautics, Vol. 33, No. 11Consensus Based Cooperative Guidance with a LeaderImpact-Time-Control Guidance Strategy with a Composite Structure Considering the Seeker’s Field-of-View ConstraintSeokwon Lee, Namhoon Cho and Youdan Kim27 April 2020 | Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, Vol. 43, No. 8Deviated Pursuit based Cooperative Simultaneous Interception against Moving TargetsFinite-Time Impact Time Guidance using Deviated Pursuit against Maneuvering TargetsNonlinear Impact Time Guidance with Constrained Field-of-ViewA Guidance Strategy for Strapdown Seeker considering Minimum Field-of-View Angle ConstraintInternational Journal of Aerospace Engineering, Vol. 2020Optimal Error Dynamics in Missile Guidance14 May 2020Nonsingular PNG-Based Impact Time Control Guidance with Lower Dependence on Time-to-Go EstimateInternational Journal of Aerospace Engineering, Vol. 2019Deviated Pursuit Based Interception at A Priori Fixed TimeShashi Ranjan Kumar and Dwaipayan Mukherjee21 April 2019 | Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, Vol. 42, No. 9Circular Impact-Time GuidanceRonny Tsalik and Tal Shima29 May 2019 | Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, Vol. 42, No. 8Fixed Final Time Field of View and Impact Angle Constrained GuidanceAnalytical Impact Time Guidance Law with Reduced Filed-of-View LimitImpact Time Control Guidance with Finite-Time Convergence Based on Pure Proportional NavigationCapturability of Guidance Laws for Interception of Nonmaneuvering Target with Field-of-View LimitSeokwon Lee, Sungjun Ann, Namhoon Cho and Youdan Kim20 December 2018 | Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, Vol. 42, No. 4Three-Dimensional Optimal Impact Time Guidance for Antiship MissilesShaoming He and Defu Lin26 November 2018 | Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, Vol. 42, No. 4Impact Time Control Guidance Law for Guided Projectile Considering Time-Varying VelocitySliding-Mode Impact Time Guidance Law Design for Various Target MotionsQinglei Hu, Tuo Han and Ming Xin17 July 2018 | Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, Vol. 42, No. 1Adaptive Polynomial Guidance With Impact Angle Constraint Under Varying VelocityIEEE Access, Vol. 7 What's Popular Volume 41, Number 5May 2018 CrossmarkInformationCopyright © 2017 by the American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Inc. All rights reserved. All requests for copying and permission to reprint should be submitted to CCC at www.copyright.com; employ the ISSN 0731-5090 (print) or 1533-3884 (online) to initiate your request. See also AIAA Rights and Permissions www.aiaa.org/randp. TopicsAvionicsControl TheoryFeedback ControlGuidance, Navigation, and Control SystemsMilitary ScienceMilitary TechnologyMissile Guidance and ControlMissile Remote Control GuidanceMissile Systems, Dynamics and TechnologyNavigational GuidanceOptimal Control TheoryWeapon Systems KeywordsTerminal Sliding ModeControl GuidanceAutopilotUnmanned Aerial VehicleFlight Path AngleAngle of AttackProportional NavigationClose In Weapon SystemsFeedback LinearizationNumerical AlgorithmsAcknowledgmentThis work is supported by the National Nature Science Foundation of China under grants 61473003 and 61633001.PDF Received28 June 2017Accepted4 December 2017Published online2 January 2018

Quantized Fault-Tolerant Control for Attitude Stabilization with Fixed-Time Disturbance Observer

Adaptive Momentum Distribution Jitter Control for Microsatellite

Adaptive Control for Quadrotors with Uncertain and Faulty Actuators

Constrained Control Allocation of a Quadrotor-Like Autonomous Underwater Vehicle

Large Field-of-View Infrared Horizon Sensor Attitude Correction for Earth's Oblateness

Adaptive Backstepping Sliding Mode Fault Tolerant Control for Satellite Attitude under Actuator Faults

Adaptive Fault-Tolerant Attitude Tracking Control for Flexible Spacecraft with Guaranteed Performance Bounds

Adaptive fault-tolerant attitude tracking control for spacecraft with input quantization

Adaptive Fixed-Time Nonsingular Terminal Sliding Mode Attitude Tracking Control for Spacecraft with Actuator Saturations and Faults

Fixed-time fuzzy disturbance observer–based adaptive integral sliding-mode spacecraft attitude control under time-varying output constraints

Event-triggered fault-tolerant attitude tracking control for spacecraft with fixed-time controller and disturbance observer under input constraints

Fault-Tolerant Attitude Control for Rigid Spacecraft Without Angular Velocity Measurements

Robust Adaptive Attitude Control for Non-Rigid Spacecraft with Quantized Control Input.

A novel learning observer-based fault-tolerant attitude control for rigid spacecraft

Fixed-Time Disturbance Observer-Based Attitude Prescribed Performance Predictive Control for Flexible Spacecraft

Fault-tolerant attitude control for liquid-filled flexible spacecraft without angular velocity measurements based on disturbance observer

Youla Parameterization Fault-Tolerant Controller Design for Aircraft

Fault Tolerant Attitude Control for Flexible Satellite with Uncertainties and Actuator Saturation

Approximation-free Attitude Fault-tolerant Tracking Control of Rigid Spacecraft with Global Stability and Appointed Accuracy

Nonsingular Sliding-Mode Control for Field-of-View Constrained Impact Time Guidance

Adaptive fuzzy backstepping control for attitude stabilization of flexible spacecraft with signal quantization and actuator faults