Uniaxial Compressive Strength Estimation Based on the Primary Wave Velocity in Coal: Considering Scale Effect and Anisotropy

Honghua Song,Yixin Zhao,Nima Noraei Danesh,Yaodong Jiang,Yutao Li

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/15567036.2020.1834644

2020-01-01

Abstract:Coal mass strength estimation has attracted broad attentions for decades. Investigating the effect of scale and anisotropy on the Uniaxial Compressive Strength (UCS) estimation viaP-wave velocity is crucial in upscaling the lab-obtained correlation to coal mass strength evaluation. Microstructures were considered as the major impact factors for the scale difference and anisotropy of mechanical properties in coal. Thus, the microstructure correlated influence of specimen sizes and anisotropy angles on the UCS estimation based on the primary wave (P-wave) velocity were investigated here. Specimens with four diameters (25 mm to 75 mm) and six anisotropy angles (angles between bedding plane orientation and coring direction, 0 degrees to 90 degrees) were processed. Roles microstructures played for theP-wave propagation were explored by the X-ray computed tomography scanning andP-wave velocity tests. The UCS estimation viaP-wave velocity in coal were investigated by regression analysis, significances of scale and anisotropy effect on this correlation were quantitatively evaluated by an introduced one-way analysis of variance method.P-wave velocity for specimens with different diameters exhibits a U-shaped variation against anisotropy angles, it reduces at anisotropy angles 0 degrees similar to 45 degrees, while raises within that of 45 degrees similar to 90 degrees, the minimum, maximum, and second largest value were acquired, respectively, at the anisotropy angle 45 degrees, 90 degrees, and 0 degrees. This was considered caused by the complementary variation of angles between directions ofP-wave propagation and orientations of bedding plane and major cleats.P-wave velocity wakens in larger specimens, velocity reductions are significantly at the anisotropy angle of 45 degrees, while less obviously at 0 degrees and 90 degrees. While the anisotropy ofP-wave velocity strengthens as diameters gain. Specimen sizes and anisotropy angles were proved to affect the UCS estimation viaP-wave velocity by the one-way analysis of variance. Exponential correlation was verified more appropriate in the UCS estimation viaP-wave velocity in coal, specimens with diameter 38 mm and anisotropy angle 45 degrees were proved optimal for the UCS estimating byP-wave velocity in coal, since the correlation between them is stronger than other diameters and anisotropy angles. This research facilitates us in quickly and accurately strength estimating in anisotropy coal, meanwhile, it also provides references in extending the lab-obtained mechanical properties of coal/rock specimens to coal/rock mass.